Rasmus Kastoft1, Kristoffer Barfod2, Jesper Bencke3, Merete B Speedtsberg3, Sanja Bay Hansen4, Jeannette Ø Penny2,5. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. Rasmus-kastoft@dadlnet.dk. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. 3. Laboratory of Human Movement Analysis, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager, Hvidovre, Denmark. 4. Department of Radiology, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate Achilles tendon length after non-surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (aATR), and to evaluate indirect effects of possible persistent elongation on kinematics. METHODS: The study was performed as a cross-sectional study based on a population of patients from an RCT regarding non-operative treatment of aATR. Thirty-seven patients out of the 56 in the original RCT participated with at a follow up of 4-5 years after aATR. Primary outcome was Achilles tendon elongation. Additional outcomes were Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), calf circumference, passive ankle plantar and dorsiflexion and loading pattern. Foot pressure mapping was performed to measure plantar loading distribution pattern; medial and lateral forefoot peak pressure, heel peak pressure, medial versus lateral loading pattern and timing of heel lift during roll over process. The healthy leg was used as a control. RESULTS: The injured Achilles tendon was significantly elongated by 1.7 (SD 1.6) cm compared to the non-injured leg. A slight delay of 2.6% (SD 6.0) was measured in heel lift in the injured side compared to the non-injured leg. We found no significant difference in forefoot peak pressure, medial and lateral peak pressure as well as heel peak pressure, and no correlation was found between Achilles tendon length and pressure measurements. Finally, dorsiflexion was 1.9°(SD1.28) larger, ATRA 8.1°(SD6.7) larger, and calf circumference 1.6 cm (SD1.1) lower on the injured leg. CONCLUSION: The Achilles tendon was 1.7 cm elongated 4.5 years after the initial injury and significant changes in ATRA, calf circumference and passive dorsiflexion was present. Except for a slight delay in heel lift-off, kinematics during walking was symmetrical between injured and healthy leg, even with an elongated tendon on the injured leg. The clinical relevance of the Achilles tendon elongation is uncertain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT02760784.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate Achilles tendon length after non-surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (aATR), and to evaluate indirect effects of possible persistent elongation on kinematics. METHODS: The study was performed as a cross-sectional study based on a population of patients from an RCT regarding non-operative treatment of aATR. Thirty-seven patients out of the 56 in the original RCT participated with at a follow up of 4-5 years after aATR. Primary outcome was Achilles tendon elongation. Additional outcomes were Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), calf circumference, passive ankle plantar and dorsiflexion and loading pattern. Foot pressure mapping was performed to measure plantar loading distribution pattern; medial and lateral forefoot peak pressure, heel peak pressure, medial versus lateral loading pattern and timing of heel lift during roll over process. The healthy leg was used as a control. RESULTS: The injured Achilles tendon was significantly elongated by 1.7 (SD 1.6) cm compared to the non-injured leg. A slight delay of 2.6% (SD 6.0) was measured in heel lift in the injured side compared to the non-injured leg. We found no significant difference in forefoot peak pressure, medial and lateral peak pressure as well as heel peak pressure, and no correlation was found between Achilles tendon length and pressure measurements. Finally, dorsiflexion was 1.9°(SD1.28) larger, ATRA 8.1°(SD6.7) larger, and calf circumference 1.6 cm (SD1.1) lower on the injured leg. CONCLUSION: The Achilles tendon was 1.7 cm elongated 4.5 years after the initial injury and significant changes in ATRA, calf circumference and passive dorsiflexion was present. Except for a slight delay in heel lift-off, kinematics during walking was symmetrical between injured and healthy leg, even with an elongated tendon on the injured leg. The clinical relevance of the Achilles tendon elongation is uncertain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT02760784.
Authors: Michael R Carmont; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Annelie Brorsson; Nicklas Olsson; Nicola Maffulli; Jon Karlsson Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol Date: 2015-02-20
Authors: Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; Ioana R Marian; Susan J Dutton; Sarah E Lamb; Benjamin Ollivere; Mandy Maredza; Stavros Petrou; Rebecca S Kearney Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Brandon J Erickson; Randy Mascarenhas; Bryan M Saltzman; David Walton; Simon Lee; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2015-04-17