| Literature DB >> 35233016 |
Aram Rezaei1, Yasaman Mohammadi2, Ali Ramazani2, Huajun Zheng3.
Abstract
The idea of applying ultrasound (US) as a green activation method in chemical transformations, especially in catalytic alcohol oxidations, technically and ecologically appeals to chemists. In the present work, as an attempt to fulfill the idea of designing an eco-friendly system to oxidize alcoholic substrates into corresponding aldehydes, we developed multifunctional tungstate-decorated CQD base catalyst, A-CQDs/W, and examined its sonooxidation performance in presence of H2O2 as a green oxidant in aqua media. By comparing the catalyst performance in oxidize benzyl alcohol as a testing model to benzaldehyde (BeOH) prior and after US irradiation-trace vs 93%- the key role of ultrasonic irradiation in achieving high yield is completely appreciated. Exceptional thermal and compression condition that is created as a result of acoustic waves is in charge of unparalleled yield results in this type of activation method. The immense degree of reagent interaction in this method, ensures the maximum yield in notably low time, which in turn leads to decrease in the number of unreacted reagents and by-products. Meanwhile, the need for using toxic organic solvents and hazardous oxidants, auxiliaries and phase transfer catalyst (PTC) is completely obviated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35233016 PMCID: PMC8888602 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06874-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparative table of reported methods for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol.
| Catalyst | Condition | Conversion (%) | Selectivity (%) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Imidazolium]3[PO4(W(O)(O2)2)4]3− | Catalyst (0.05 mmol), [bmim][BF4], H2O2: BeOH (2:1), 90 °C, 8h | – | 78 | [ |
| 2 | PW/DAIL/MIL-101(Cr) | Catalyst (6 μmol), TBHP: BeOH (4.5:1), CHCl3,100 °C, 6h | 95 | 99 | [ |
| 3 | WO4=@PMO-IL | Catalyst (1.5 mol%), H2O2: BeOH (5:1), MeCN: H2O (1:1),(50 mmol), 90 °C, 12 h | 75 | 100 | [ |
| 4 | CoFeO4 (Ultrasound) | Catalyst (1 mol%), H2O2: BeOH (1:1), H2O, 70 °C, 15 min | 16.7 | 1.6 | [ |
| 5 | FeCl3/HNO3 (Ultrasound) | Catalyst (0.5 mmol), BeOH (1 mmol), acetone, r.t., 10 min | – | 94 | [ |
| 6 | CuSO4.5H2O (Ultrasound) | Catalyst:KMnO4 (1:1, 2.2 g), BeOH (1 mmol), CH2Cl2, 30 min | 73 | > 97 | [ |
| 7 | GO (Ultrasound) | Catalyst (200 wt%), BeOH (1 mmol), toluene, 80 °C, 2h | – | 98 | [ |
| 8 | A-CQDs/W (Ultrasound) | Catalyst (1 mol%), H2O2: BeOH (3:1), r.t., 3 min | 98 | 93 | This work |
Figure 1Schematic procedure for the synthesis of the A-CQDs/W catalyst.
Figure 2(a) FT-IR Spectra of A-CQDs (blue graph) and A-CQDs/W (pink graph), (b) XRD pattern of A-CQDs (blue graph) and A-CQDs/W (pink graph).
Figure 3(a) UV–vis spectrum of A-CQDs (blue graph) and A-CQDs/W (pink graph), (b) TGA plot of A-CQDs (blue graph) and A-CQDs/W (pink graph).
Figure 4PL graphs of A-CQDs/W (a) Ex = 310–350 nm, (b) Ex = 350–390 nm.
Figure 5TEM images of A-CQDs/W, (a) 100 nm resolution, (b) 200 nm resolution.
Figure 6FESEM images of A-CQDs/W, (a) 100 nm resolution, (b) 200 nm resolution. Elemental mapping of A-CQDs/W, (c) Carbon, (d) Oxygen, (e) Nitrogen, (f) Tungsten.
Figure 7(a) 1H-NMR graph of A-CQDs, (b) 13C-NMR and (c) DEPT-135 NMR graph of A-CQDs.
The impacts of different reaction conditions on the sonooxidation of benzyl alcohol by A-CQDs/W.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Catalyst | Mol (%) | Time (min) | H2O2/Substrate (mmol/mmol) | Power (%) | Yield (%)a | Conversion (%)a |
| 1 | Na2WO4 | 1 | 5 | 3/1 | 80 | Trace | Trace |
| 2 | A-CQDs | 10 mg | 5 | 3/1 | 80 | 13 | 16 |
| 3 | A-CQDs/W | 0.5 | 3 | 3/1 | 80 | 77 | 81 |
| 4 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 3 | 3/1 | 80 | 93 | 98 |
| 5 | A-CQDs/W | 1.5 | 3 | 3/1 | 80 | 90 | 97 |
| 6 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 3 | 3/1 | 70 | 75 | 80 |
| 7 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 3 | 3/1 | 60 | 51 | 55 |
| 8 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 3 | 0 | 80 | Trace | Trace |
| 9 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 3 | 2/1 | 80 | 79 | 87 |
| 10 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 3 | 4/1 | 80 | 67 | 71 |
| 11 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 1 | 3/1 | 80 | 66 | 72 |
| 12 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 5 | 3/1 | 80 | 86 | 70 |
| 13 | A-CQDs/W | 1 | 7 | 3/1 | 80 | 71 | 78 |
aConversions and yields were calculated based on initial mmol of benzyl alcohol, (Isolated Yields).
The impacts of different additives on the sonooxidation of benzyl alcohol by A-CQDs/W.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Additive | Yield (%) | Conversion (%) |
| 1 | KCl | 92 | 95 |
| 2 | KOH | 71 | 74 |
| 3 | Na2CO3 | 77 | 80 |
| 4 | NaHCO3 | 80 | 83 |
| 5 | H2SO4 | 94 | 96 |
| 6 | NaHSO4 | 89 | 92 |
Optimal condition: Catalyst (1 mol%), Time (3 min), H2O2/Substrate (3 mmol/1 mmol), Power (80%). Conversions and yields were calculated based on initial mmol of benzyl alcohol, (Isolated Yields).
Figure 9Schematic mechanism related to sonocatalitic oxidation of alcohol substrates into corresponding aldehydes.
The impacts of different solvents on the sonooxidation of benzyl alcohol by A-CQDs/W.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Solvent | Yield (%) | Conversion (%) |
| 1 | H2O | 93 | 95 |
| 2 | EtOH | 73 | 76 |
| 3 | DMF | 71 | 74 |
| 4 | DMSO | 80 | 85 |
| 5 | Acetonitrile | 79 | 81 |
| 6 | H2O/Acetonitrile | 89 | 93 |
| 7 | H2O/DMF | 85 | 88 |
Optimal condition: Catalyst (1 mol%), Time (3 min), H2O2/Substrate (3 mmol/1 mmol), Power (80%). Conversions and yields were calculated based on initial mmol of benzyl alcohol, (Isolated Yields).
Sonooxidation of alcohols to corresponding aldehydes in the presence of A-CQDs/W catalyst.
| Entry | Substrate | Product | Yield (%) | Conversion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
| 89 | 94 |
| 2 |
|
| 91 | 93 |
| 3 |
|
| 95 | 98 |
| 4 |
|
| 84 | 87 |
| 5 |
|
| 88 | 92 |
Optimal condition: Catalyst (1 mol%), Time (3 min), H2O2/Substrate (3 mmol/1 mmol), Power (80%). Conversions and yields were calculated based on initial mmol of benzyl alcohol, (Isolated Yields).
Figure 8The reusability of A-CQDs/W in oxidation of benzyl alcohol.