| Literature DB >> 35232483 |
Rong Liu1, Yuxing Chen2, Hao Liu2, Xihui Huang3, Fang Zhou4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC) is classified as a class C notifiable infectious disease in China and poses a great threat to public health. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological trends and hotspots of AHC in mainland China. Sociodemographic factors that could contribute to early warning of AHC were further explored.Entities:
Keywords: Acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis; Disease hotspots; Sociodemographic factors; Trends
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35232483 PMCID: PMC8889670 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-022-01758-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Fig. 1The incidence and space–time cluster of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis in mainland China, 2004–2018
Incidence and trends of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis by 31 surveillance provinces/municipalities/regions in mainland China, 2004–2018
| Region | Number of cases | Average annual incidence (/100,000) | AAPC | Trends | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004–2018 | 2004–2009 | 2010–2018 | ||||
| Guangxi | 150,716 | 20.91 | 6.45 | 30.55 | 8.49 (− 3.45 to 21.91) | Stable |
| Hainan | 23,477 | 17.68 | 4.00 | 26.8 | 31.80 (9.54–58.58)* | |
| Guangdong | 143,833 | 9.84 | 7.21 | 11.6 | 1.67 (− 12.17 to 17.69) | Stable |
| Chongqing | 30,686 | 7.04 | 4.06 | 9.03 | 3.32 (− 6.58 to 14.27) | Stable |
| Hubei | 54,810 | 6.34 | 2.03 | 9.22 | 19.95 (4.06 to 38.28)* | |
| Zhejiang | 49,228 | 6.32 | 4.55 | 7.50 | − 4.47 (− 16.76 to 9.65) | Stable |
| Anhui | 31,888 | 3.48 | 0.54 | 5.45 | 24.58 (12.48 to 37.98)* | |
| Yunnan | 23,438 | 3.36 | 1.85 | 4.37 | 26.12 (7.77 to 47.60)* | |
| Sichuan | 40,429 | 3.29 | 2.77 | 3.64 | − 7.13 (− 17.59 to 4.67) | Stable |
| Hunan | 29,099 | 2.97 | 1.26 | 4.11 | 10.69 (− 2.02 to 25.06) | Stable |
| Shaanxi | 15,943 | 2.82 | 0.64 | 4.28 | 11.77 (− 8.72 to 36.87) | Stable |
| Guizhou | 13,599 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.63 | 8.46 (0.56 to 16.99)* | |
| Jiangxi | 16,009 | 2.39 | 0.62 | 3.56 | 15.29 (2.78 to 29.32)* | |
| Beijing | 4882 | 1.99 | 4.07 | 0.61 | − 24.17 (− 26.46 to − 21.81)* | |
| Fujian | 10,815 | 1.96 | 0.69 | 2.81 | 8.04 (− 5.53 to 23.55) | Stable |
| Hebei | 20,985 | 1.93 | 1.12 | 2.48 | 13.05 (10.02 to 16.16)* | |
| Ningxia | 1799 | 1.89 | 1.52 | 2.14 | 3.59 (− 0.98 to 8.38) | Stable |
| Henan | 20,589 | 1.45 | 0.43 | 2.13 | 19.31 (12.96 to 26.02)* | |
| Gansu | 5087 | 1.31 | 0.35 | 1.94 | 22.75 (16.77 to 29.04)* | |
| Qinghai | 894 | 1.04 | 0.64 | 1.3 | 11.42 (7.48 to 15.51)* | |
| Tibet | 434 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.42 (− 19.07 to 27.10) | Stable |
| Shanghai | 2396 | 0.86 | 1.12 | 0.69 | − 22.84 (− 29.81 to − 15.17)* | |
| Jiangsu | 9398 | 0.8 | 0.48 | 1.02 | 7.97 (− 6.48 to 24.65) | Stable |
| Shanxi | 4066 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.95 | 3.75 (− 4.90 to 13.18) | Stable |
| Tianjin | 1190 | 0.71 | 1.32 | 0.30 | − 23.49 (− 26.5 to − 20.35)* | |
| Shandong | 8695 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.87 | 18.59 (9.63 to 28.29)* | |
| Inner Mongolia | 1976 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.62 | 12.39 (2.3 to 23.47)* | |
| Xinjiang | 1111 | 0.36 | 0.64 | 0.17 | − 15.15 (− 18.08 to − 12.12)* | |
| Jilin | 1300 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.42 | − 3.27 (− 20.67 to 17.94) | Stable |
| Liaoning | 1264 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 4.92 (− 1.42 to 11.67) | Stable |
| Heilongjiang | 604 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.15 (− 8.10 to 9.15) | Stable |
| Mainland China | 720,640 | 3.58 | 1.82 | 4.75 | 8.04 (− 5.53 to 23.55) | Stable |
*P < 0.05
Fig. 2Trends in incidence of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis in mainland China, 2004–2018 (red font*: statistically significant trends; APC: annual percentage change; AAPC: average annual percentage change)
Fig. 3The seasonality and age group distribution of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis in mainland China, 2004–2018
The log− linear model for the association between sociodemographic factors and incidence of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis
| Variables | Coefficient | Standard error | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 0.1654 | 0.0248 | < 0.001** |
| Birth rate | 18.513 | 4.5161 | < 0.001** |
| Population ages 0–14 (% of total population) | 0.0760 | 0.0376 | 0.044* |
| Urban population (% of total population) | 0.0755 | 0.0119 | < 0.001** |
| Population density | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.704 |
| Log passenger traffic | 0.1244 | 0.0267 | < 0.001** |
| Gross domestic product per capital | − 0.0004 | 0.0000 | < 0.001** |
| Health workers (per 1000 people) | − 0.0219 | 0.0594 | 0.106 |
**P < 0.001; *P < 0.05