Literature DB >> 35232298

Emergency department use by persons with MS: A population-based descriptive study with a focus on infection-related visits.

Jonas Graf1, Huah Shin Ng1, Feng Zhu1, Yinshan Zhao1, José Ma Wijnands1, Charity Evans2, John D Fisk3, Ruth Ann Marrie4, Helen Tremlett1.   

Abstract

We described emergency department (ED) visits (all visits and infection-related) by persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) in British Columbia, Canada (1 April 2012 to 31 December 2017). We identified 15,350 MS cases using health administrative data; 73.4% were women, averaging 51.4 years at study entry. Over 4.9 years of follow-up (mean), 56.0% of MS cases visited an ED (mean = 0.6 visits/person/year; total = 37,072 visits). A diagnosis was documented for 25,698 (69.3%) ED visits, and 18.4% (4725/25,698) were infection-related. Inpatient admissions were reported for 20.4% (5238/25,698) of all and 29.2% (1380/4725) of infection-related ED visits. Findings suggest that the ED plays a substantial role in MS healthcare and infection management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; emergency department; healthcare utilization; population-based data

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35232298      PMCID: PMC9442277          DOI: 10.1177/13524585221078497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   5.855


Introduction

Emergency department (ED) presentations represent an important aspect of health care utilization in the general population.[1,2] Compared to the general population, persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently access the healthcare system, with infections contributing to this higher healthcare use. For example, persons with MS had 41% more infection-related physician claims (adjusted rate ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 1.36–1.47) versus a sex-, age-, and region-matched non-MS population. However, relatively little is known about ED utilization by persons with MS.[4-6] Here, we described overall and infection-related ED use in an MS population.

Methods

We performed a descriptive, population-based study in British Columbia (BC), Canada, using linked health administrative data (via Population Data BC ), including Medical Service Plan Billing Information (providing physician claims); the Discharge Abstract Database (providing hospital admissions/discharges); PharmaNet (for prescriptions filled at outpatient/community pharmacies); Census Geodata (providing socioeconomic status estimates); Registration and Premium Billing files (providing BC residency status via the mandatory healthcare plan registration days); Vital Statistics (capturing death dates); and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System dataset (providing ED-related visit dates and Diagnosis Shortlist codes, including infections; Supplementary Table 1) starting 1 April 2012). All MS cases were identified with a validated algorithm. Study entry date was the later of the first MS/demyelinating disease-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9/10) code, or first disease-modifying drug (DMD) prescription filled, or 1 April 2012 (start of the ED date). All included persons were ⩾18 years old and BC residents for ⩾1 year pre-study entry; follow-up ended at the earliest of death, emigration, or 31 December 2017. Comorbidities were measured using a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index during the 1-year pre-study entry.[16-18] MS cases ever filling a DMD prescription during follow-up were described.

Results

We identified 15,350 MS cases (11,270 (73.4%) women; Table 1), of whom 86.5% (13,274/15,350) entered the study in 2012/2013, as per data availability. At study entry, the mean age was 51.4 years (standard deviation (SD) =13.8), and 26.5% (4072/15,350) had ⩾1 comorbidity. During the mean 4.9 (SD = 1.6) years of follow-up, 56.0% (8603/15,350) of MS cases visited an ED, totaling 37,072 visits; 15,350 MS cases averaged 0.6 (SD = 1.6) visits/person/year. MS cases visiting an ED at least once during follow-up (n = 8603) with (vs without) comorbidity at study entry were older (mean age = 56.5 (SD = 14.3) vs 49.5 (SD = 13.7) years) and averaged more ED visits/person/year (1.3 (SD = 2.4) vs 0.9 (SD = 1.9)). More than a quarter of MS cases had ⩾3 ED visits (4064/15,350; 26.5); of these 1383 (34.0%) of 4064 had ⩾1 comorbidity at study entry. Most ED visits by MS cases did not require an ambulance (26,359/37,072; 71.1%); 28.8% required a ground ambulance (10,691/37,072) and >95% were of semi-urgent or higher priority (35,468/37,072).
Table 1.

Characteristics of the multiple sclerosis study population in British Columbia, Canada (2012–2017).

Characteristics at the index dateTotal, n = 15,350
Sex, n (%)
 Women11,270 (73.4)
 Men4080 (26.6)
Age at study entry in years
 Mean (SD)51.4 (13.8)
Age group at study entry, n (%)
 <30 years1017 (6.6)
 30–39 years2137 (13.9)
 40–49 years3495 (22.8)
 50–59 years4339 (28.3)
 ⩾60 years4362 (28.4)
Calendar year at study entry, a n (%)
 2012–201313,274 (86.5)
 2014–20151203 (7.8)
 2016–2017873 (5.7)
Socioeconomic status, b n (%)
 1 (lowest income quintile)2903 (18.9)
 22905 (18.9)
 33048 (19.9)
 43302 (21.5)
 5 (highest income quintile)3043 (19.8)
 Unavailable149 (1.0)
Comorbidity score, c n (%)
 011,278 (73.5)
 12497 (16.3)
 2990 (6.4)
 ⩾3585 (3.8)
Characteristics over the study follow-up
Follow-up a time in years
 Mean (SD)4.9 (1.6)
Filled ⩾1 DMD prescription at any time during follow-up, d n (%)3079 (20.3)
 • First-generation DMD—any 2190/3079 (71.1)
 • Second generation DMD—any 1716/3079 (55.7)
Visits to the ED, no. of persons with MS (%)
 Never6747 (43.9)
 Once only2849 (18.6)
 Twice only1690 (11.0)
 ⩾3 times e 4064 (26.5)
Total number of ED visits37,072
Mode of transportation, n (%) e
 No ambulance26,359 (71.1)
 Ground ambulance only10,691 (28.8)
 Air ambulance only15 (<0.1)
 Combination of air and ground ambulance7 (<0.1)
Characteristics over the study follow-up
Triage level received, n (%) e
 Resuscitation294 (0.8)
 Emergent6145 (16.6)
 Urgent18,689 (50.4)
 Semi-urgent10,340 (27.9)
 Non-urgent1378 (3.7)
 Unknown226 (0.6)

DMD: disease-modifying drugs; N/A: not applicable; SD: standard deviation; ED: emergency department.

Follow-up was from study entry to end. As per data availability, the earliest possible study entry was 1 April 2012.

Socioeconomic status is represented by neighborhood income quintiles, based on the closest available measurement to the study entry date.

Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (modified to exclude hemiplegia/paraplegia to avoid misclassifying MS complications) during the 1-year period prior to the study entry date.[17,18] The proportion of persons with MS scoring 1 or more on the Comorbidity Index is consistent with prior work conducted in similar cohorts. The most common comorbid conditions (present at study entry) which were identified using the Index were “chronic pulmonary disease” (present in 1102/15,350; 7.2% of the study cohort), “diabetes mellitus without chronic complications” (1011; 6.6%), and “cerebrovascular disease” (629; 4.1%).

Captured as prescriptions filled; some people were exposed to >1 DMD during follow-up; hence, the sum of cases filling first- and second-generation DMD prescriptions exceeded the sum of cases ever filling a DMD prescription; first-generation DMDs included beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate, and second-generation DMDs included natalizumab, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, and ocrelizumab. Pre-study entry (1 January 1996 to 31 March 2012) 19.5% (2991/15,350) of MS cases had ever filled a DMD prescription.

The denominator used to estimate the following proportions was the total number of ED visits captured during follow-up (n = 37,072); some people had more than one ED visit during follow-up; hence, the sums of ED visits exceed the total number of persons with at least one ED visit.

Characteristics of the multiple sclerosis study population in British Columbia, Canada (2012–2017). DMD: disease-modifying drugs; N/A: not applicable; SD: standard deviation; ED: emergency department. Follow-up was from study entry to end. As per data availability, the earliest possible study entry was 1 April 2012. Socioeconomic status is represented by neighborhood income quintiles, based on the closest available measurement to the study entry date. Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (modified to exclude hemiplegia/paraplegia to avoid misclassifying MS complications) during the 1-year period prior to the study entry date.[17,18] The proportion of persons with MS scoring 1 or more on the Comorbidity Index is consistent with prior work conducted in similar cohorts. The most common comorbid conditions (present at study entry) which were identified using the Index were “chronic pulmonary disease” (present in 1102/15,350; 7.2% of the study cohort), “diabetes mellitus without chronic complications” (1011; 6.6%), and “cerebrovascular disease” (629; 4.1%). Captured as prescriptions filled; some people were exposed to >1 DMD during follow-up; hence, the sum of cases filling first- and second-generation DMD prescriptions exceeded the sum of cases ever filling a DMD prescription; first-generation DMDs included beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate, and second-generation DMDs included natalizumab, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, and ocrelizumab. Pre-study entry (1 January 1996 to 31 March 2012) 19.5% (2991/15,350) of MS cases had ever filled a DMD prescription. The denominator used to estimate the following proportions was the total number of ED visits captured during follow-up (n = 37,072); some people had more than one ED visit during follow-up; hence, the sums of ED visits exceed the total number of persons with at least one ED visit.

ED visits with a known diagnosis

Diagnostic codes were reported for 69.3% (25,698/37,072) of ED visits (summarized in Supplementary Table 2). These visits were made by 74.2% (6384/8603) of MS ED users. Of these, the most frequent primary diagnoses were “abdominal pain/colic” (1279/25,698 visits; 5.0%), “urinary tract infection” (1277 visits; 5.0%), and “MS” (1225 visits; 4.8%). When combined, 18.4% (4725/25,698) of ED visits were infection-related with 32.2% (2056/6384) of MS participants having at least one such visit. Nearly one-third (1380/4725; 29.2%) of infection-related ED visits led to hospitalization, while 20.4% (5238/25,698) of all ED visits made by 27.9% (2404/8603) of cases did so (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

DMD users versus non-users

Persons who filled ⩾1 DMD prescription(s) during follow-up (“DMD users”) were younger at study entry date than non-users (mean age = 41.9 (SD = 11.1) vs 53.8 (SD = 13.3) years). However, the proportions accessing an ED at least once were generally similar (1806/3079, 58.0% of DMD users and 6797/12,271, 55.6% of non-user), as was the study follow-up time (4.8 years (SD = 1.6) for DMD users vs 4.9 (SD = 1.6) for non-users).

Socioeconomic status

There were no clear patterns across the socioeconomic quintiles at study entry for the MS cases: ever/never filling a DMD prescription during follow-up, ever/never being hospitalized subsequent to an ED visit, or for the five most common ED diagnoses (data not shown).

Conclusion

Over 50% of persons with MS had more than one ED consultation during our nearly 6-year observation period; one-quarter visited an ED three or more times. Nearly 20% of ED visits were infection-related; one-third resulted in hospitalization, whereas one-fifth of all-cause ED visits did so. MS cases with ⩾1 (vs without) comorbidity at study entry averaged more ED visits/person/year. Our intentionally descriptive study has several limitations. While the overall burden of infection-related ED visits was considerable in our MS population, this could be higher as diagnoses were unavailable for one-third of all ED visits. Furthermore, our study lacked MS-specific clinical information, such as relapses, and a comparison to the general population. Our 1-year pre-study lookback period may have reduced the detection of comorbidities. Strengths of our study included the large cohort of MS cases identified using a validated algorithm within a geographically defined population with universal healthcare coverage, including ED visits. Our results suggest that the ED visits by MS cases often lead to hospitalizations, perhaps more so for infection-related visits. Further studies are necessary to better understand the importance of ED use by persons with MS. Click here for additional data file. Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-msj-10.1177_13524585221078497 for Emergency department use by persons with MS: A population-based descriptive study with a focus on infection-related visits by Jonas Graf, Huah Shin Ng, Feng Zhu, Yinshan Zhao, José MA Wijnands, Charity Evans, John D Fisk, Ruth Ann Marrie and Helen Tremlett in Multiple Sclerosis Journal Click here for additional data file. Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-msj-10.1177_13524585221078497 for Emergency department use by persons with MS: A population-based descriptive study with a focus on infection-related visits by Jonas Graf, Huah Shin Ng, Feng Zhu, Yinshan Zhao, José MA Wijnands, Charity Evans, John D Fisk, Ruth Ann Marrie and Helen Tremlett in Multiple Sclerosis Journal Click here for additional data file. Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-msj-10.1177_13524585221078497 for Emergency department use by persons with MS: A population-based descriptive study with a focus on infection-related visits by Jonas Graf, Huah Shin Ng, Feng Zhu, Yinshan Zhao, José MA Wijnands, Charity Evans, John D Fisk, Ruth Ann Marrie and Helen Tremlett in Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  10 in total

1.  Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Gerry A Parsons; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The rising prevalence and changing age distribution of multiple sclerosis in Manitoba.

Authors:  R A Marrie; N Yu; J Blanchard; S Leung; L Elliott
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Infection-related health care utilization among people with and without multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  José Ma Wijnands; Elaine Kingwell; Feng Zhu; Yinshan Zhao; John D Fisk; Charity Evans; Ruth Ann Marrie; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Intensive care unit admission in multiple sclerosis: increased incidence and increased mortality.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Marrie; Charles N Bernstein; Christine A Peschken; Carol A Hitchon; Hui Chen; Randy Fransoo; Allan Garland
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Emergency medical care of multiple sclerosis patients: primary data from the mount sinai resource utilization in multiple sclerosis project.

Authors:  Svenja Oynhausen; Megan Alcauskas; Christine Hannigan; Yadira Bencosme; Marcus Müller; Fred Lublin; Stephen Krieger
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Health service utilization in immigrants with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Dalia L Rotstein; Ruth Ann Marrie; Karen Tu; Susan E Schultz; Kinwah Fung; Colleen J Maxwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Characteristics of frequent emergency department users in British Columbia, Canada: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Moe; Fiona O'Sullivan; Margaret J McGregor; Michael J Schull; Kathryn Dong; Brian R Holroyd; Eric Grafstein; Corinne M Hohl; Johanna Trimble; Kimberlyn M McGrail
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-03-02

8.  Triaging Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in the Emergency Department: Room for Improvement.

Authors:  Hesham Abboud; Karin Mente; Meagan Seay; Jeffrey Kim; Ashhar Ali; Robert Bermel; Mary A Willis
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

9.  Characteristics of a population-based multiple sclerosis cohort treated with disease-modifying drugs in a universal healthcare setting.

Authors:  Huah Shin Ng; Feng Zhu; Elaine Kingwell; Yinshan Zhao; Shenzhen Yao; Okechukwu Ekuma; Lawrence W Svenson; Charity Evans; John D Fisk; Ruth Ann Marrie; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.618

10.  Temporal trends in emergency department volumes and crowding metrics in a western Canadian province: a population-based, administrative data study.

Authors:  Brian H Rowe; Andrew McRae; Rhonda J Rosychuk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.