Literature DB >> 35230939

Effective ureteral access sheath insertion during flexible ureteroscopy: Influence of the ureteral orifice configuration.

Raed A Azhar1,2, Musab M Alghamdi2, Abdullah A Khawaji2, Anmar M Nassir3, Sameer Munshi4, Waseem Tayeb4, Mohamed A Elkoushy4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the possible predictors for effective insertion of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) in virgin ureters and their impact on postoperative ureteral wall injury and the procedural outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all consecutive patients scheduled for fURS of virgin ureters at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2020. Demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative data, including the configuration of the ureteral orifice (UO) over introductory guidewire insertion, were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to detect possible predictors of successful UAS insertion.
RESULTS: In total, 128 patients who underwent primary fURS were included, with a mean age of 43.3±12.3 years and a stone burden of 12.3±6.9 mm. One hundred and ten patients (85.9%) achieved successful ureteral access insertion, including 81 (63.3%) without ureteral dilatation and 35 with dilation, of which 29 (22.7%) had a successful UAS afterward, while six failed. Total patients who underwent ureteral orifice dilatation were 35. 29 had a successful UAS afterward, while 6 failed. Patients who underwent successful UAS placement into virgin ureters were significantly older and had a lower body mass index (BMI). A tent-shaped UO over the guidewire led to successful UAS insertion. In multivariate regression analysis, cases with BMI <30 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-7.03) and those with a tent-shaped UO over the introductory guidewire (OR 6.60, 95% CI 3.8-7.2) maintained their significance to predict successful UAS insertion into virgin ureters. Nine patients (8.2%) had ureteral mucosal injuries, and the overall stone-free rate was 78.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with normal BMIs and tent-shaped UOs over the introductory guidewires are more likely to achieve primary UAS insertion without the need for ureteral dilation.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230939      PMCID: PMC9328857          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   2.052


  23 in total

1.  Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Jamil Rehman; Manoj Monga; Jaime Landman; David I Lee; Tamer Felfela; Marius C Conradie; Rajamahanty Srinivas; Chandru P Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The new concept of ureteral access sheath with guidewire disengagement: One wire does it all.

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Esteban Emiliani; Felix Millán; Cesare Marco Scoffone; Thomas Knoll; Palle J S Osther; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The Impact of Preoperative α-Adrenergic Antagonists on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Force and the Upper Limit of Force Required to Avoid Ureteral Mucosal Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Jun-Ho Yoon; No-Cheol Park; Hye Sun Lee; Hyun Kyu Ahn; Kwang Suk Lee; Do Kyung Kim; Kang Su Cho; Byung Ha Chung; Chang Hee Hong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy?

Authors:  J Kourambas; R R Byrne; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Ureteral ischemia model: an explanation of ureteral dysfunction after chronic obstruction.

Authors:  Caner Z Dinlenc; Evangelos N Liatsikos; Arthur D Smith
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Failure of ureteral access sheath insertion in virgin ureters: A retrospective tertiary care center study.

Authors:  Mohammad Alkhamees; Ahmed Aljuhayman; Abdulmalik Addar; Yahya Ghazwani; Ahmed Alasker; Saeed Bin Hamri
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2020-08-10

7.  Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Alexandre Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Gaetan Berquet; Paul Prunel; Grégory Verhoest; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Is a ureteral stent required after use of ureteral access sheath in presented patients who undergo flexible ureteroscopy?

Authors:  Gastón Astroza; Manuel Catalán; Lucas Consigliere; Tomás Selman; José Salvadó; Francisco Rubilar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 10.  Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Zhijian Zhao; Jad Khaled AlSmadi; Xiongfa Liang; Fangling Zhong; Tao Zeng; Weizhou Wu; Tuo Deng; Yongchang Lai; Luhao Liu; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification of the Risk Factors for the Failure of Ureteral Access Sheath Placement.

Authors:  Jieping Hu; Yue Yu; Wei Liu; Jialei Zhong; Xiaochen Zhou; Haibo Xi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.149

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.