Literature DB >> 35230820

Hydrophobic Localized Enrichment of Co-reactants to Enhance Electrochemiluminescence of Conjugated Polymers for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Proteins.

Yingying Chen1, Ying He1, Jinwen Zhao1, Jin Zhang2, Ruo Yuan1, Shihong Chen1.   

Abstract

The enrichment of co-reactants is one of the keys to improving the sensitivity of electrochemiluminescence (ECL) detection. This work developed a novel hydrophobic localized enrichment strategy of co-reactants utilizing the inner hydrophobic cavity of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD). Pt nanoparticles (Pt NPs) were grown in situ on the coordination sites for metal ions of β-CD to prepare the β-CD-Pt nanocomposite, which could not only enrich co-reactant 3-(dibutylamino) propylamine (TDBA) highly efficiently through its hydrophobic cavity but also immobilize TDBA via the Pt-N bond. Meanwhile, the carboxyl-functionalized poly[2,5-dioctyl-1,4-phenylene] (PDP) polymer nanoparticles (PNPs) were developed as excellent ECL luminophores. With SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (ncovNP) as a model protein, the TDBA-β-CD-Pt nanocomposite combined PDP PNPs to construct a biosensor for ncovNP determination. The PDP PNPs were modified onto the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) to capture the first antibody (Ab1) and further capture antigen and secondary antibody complexes (TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2). The resultant biosensor with a sandwich structure achieved a highly sensitive detection of ncovNP with a detection limit of 22 fg/mL. TDBA-β-CD-Pt shared with an inspiration in hydrophobic localized enrichment of co-reactants for improving the sensitivity of ECL detection. The luminophore PDP PNPs integrated TDBA-β-CD-Pt to provide a promising and sensitive ECL platform, offering a new method for ncovNP detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230820      PMCID: PMC8903209          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused many deaths worldwide.[1] As one of the four major structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2, the nucleocapsid protein (NP) with the most abundant structural features was generally considered as a biomarker of SARS-CoV-2.[2] Recently, several methods have been developed to detect the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (ncovNP), such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs),[3] luciferase IP system (LIPS),[4] and lateral flow assay (LFA).[5] However, those reported methods were characterized by a low sensitivity or complex operation, so their applications were limited.[6] The development of a sensitive and simple test for ncovNP is critical. Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) technology is characterized by low background, high sensitivity, and simple operation and has attracted extensive attention in clinical analysis, environmental monitoring, and food safety.[7,8] The nucleic acid detection related to SARS-CoV-2 using the ECL method has been reported.[9] The sensitivity of nucleic acid detection is relatively high, but it has disadvantages such as cumbersome extraction process and false-negative results.[10] Compared with nucleic acid detection, protein detection is characterized by a simpler operation, higher specificity, and higher accuracy.[11] So far, there are few reports concerning the ECL protein detection of ncovNP. Thus, ECL strategies for ncovNP protein detection are worth exploring. An excellent ECL luminophore is one of the keys to achieving highly sensitive ECL detection. Among the numerous ECL luminophores such as organic polymers, inorganic complex, organic small molecules, and inorganic nanomaterials such as metal nanoclusters and various quantum dots, the organic polymers have received great attention due to their high photostability, low cellular toxicity, and easy functionalization.[12,13] The organic polymers reported as ECL signal probes mainly include polyfluorene and polyfluorene derivatives, poly(phenylenevinylene), and heterocycle-containing polymers. For example, the polyfluorene derivatives PFBT[13] and PFO[14] were developed as ECL luminophores to achieve true-color ECL imaging for detecting multiplex and ratio detection of microRNA-155, respectively. Cui’s group used heterocycle-containing thiophene-fused conjugated microporous polymer with a strong dual-band bipolar ECL emission to detect rhodamine B.[15] Ju’s group prepared polymer dots containing poly(phenylenevinylene) CN-PPV with high ECL efficiency to construct an ECL biosensor for detecting Fe3+.[16] The types of organic polymer reported in the literature are limited. It is significant to develop new ECL polymer luminophores. The introduction of co-reactants is also crucial for highly sensitive ECL detection. The most common method to introduce co-reactants is to add them directly into the detection solution. Such a method is simple, but the stability and repeatability problems of the ECL system cannot be ignored.[17] The in situ production of co-reactants by the enzyme-catalyzed reaction faces complex operation and harsh conditions of enzyme use, so its applications are limited.[18] Attaching co-reactants to the electrode surface can overcome the disadvantage of introducing the co-reactants described above, and some strategies such as covalent bonding and cross-linking have been adopted.[19,20] However, it is still challenging to achieve high loading of co-reactants on the electrode surface. Since the hydrophobic localized enrichment can significantly enhance the concentration of co-reactants on the electrode surface, enriching co-reactants by the material with a hydrophobic cavity may be an ideal choice to realize high loading of co-reactants on the electrode surface. For example, Yuan’s group synthesized hydrophobic porous covalent organic frameworks (COFs) as microreactors to provide co-reactants with the microenvironment, thus achieving a confinement-enhanced ECL.[21] Yuan’s group also reported that the co-reactants could be enriched around the electrode surface by hydrophobic interaction between cholesterol and co-reactants.[22] However, the hydrophobic localized enrichment of co-reactants described above was for the co-reactants present in the detection solution, which still caused stability and repeatability problems in the ECL system.[17] Therefore, it is of great value to develop a material with an inner hydrophobic cavity for enriching co-reactants to achieve their immobilization on the electrode surface. β-Cyclodextrin (β-CD) has an inner hydrophobic cavity and an outer large number of the hydroxyl groups and has been widely used for functionalization of materials, guest recognition, and coordination with metal ions in the ECL field. For example, Chen’s group applied β-CD-functionalized carbon nanohorns to detect naringin based on the fact that naringin could enter into the cavity of β-CD to form an inclusion complex.[23] He’s group utilized the host–guest recognition between aptamer and tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II)-β-cyclodextrin for detecting thrombin.[24] Wei’s group utilized metal-binding sites of β-CD to bind Pb2+ for synthesizing metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).[25] In addition, the hydrophobic nanocavity of β-CD could act as a nanoreactor, creating a restricted system to accelerate electronic excitation.[26] The restriction effect of nanocavity and binding sites with metal ions of β-CD may provide two completely different forces for simultaneously immobilizing co-reactants, namely, hydrophobic localized enrichment and covalent bonding through metal nanoparticles grown in situ on β-CD. Inspired by the above observations, this work developed a simple and effective strategy for hydrophobic localized enrichment of co-reactant 3-(dibutylamino) propylamine (TDBA) utilizing the inner hydrophobic cavity of β-CD. On the other hand, the coordination sites for metal ions of β-CD make it easy for Pt nanoparticles (Pt NPs) to grow in situ on β-CD, which could immobilize TDBA and the second antibody (Ab2) via the Pt–N bond. Meanwhile, the carboxyl-functionalized poly[2,5-dioctyl-1,4-phenylene] polymer nanoparticles (PDP PNPs) were developed as luminophores. As seen from its molecular structure in Scheme , obviously, PDP is different from other reported ECL organic polymers, including polyfluorene derivatives, poly(phenylenevinylene), and heterocycle-containing polymers, and is a kind of biphenyl polymer with a relatively simple structure. PDP PNPs have good dispersibility and stability in water, as well as excellent luminescence stability. PDP PNPs were modified onto the GCE surface to capture the first antibody (Ab1) and further capture ncovNP and the secondary antibody complex (TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2). Due to the systematic action of hydrophobic localized enrichment and covalent bonding, the amount of TDBA immobilized on the electrode surface was increased significantly, and the ECL intensity was improved nearly fivefold as compared to that without β-CD, thus achieving a sensitive detection of ncovNP with a detection limit of 22 fg/mL. β-CD provided an attractive strategy for high loading co-reactants on the electrode surface. The integration of β-CD-Pt nanocomposites as excellent carriers of co-reactants and PDP PNPs as an excellent ECL luminophore would build an attractive ECL platform and shed light on the ultrasensitive detection of ncovNP.
Scheme 1

Preparation of (A) PDP PNPs and (B) TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2. (C) Illustration of the Construction of Biosensor for ncovNP Determination.

Experiment Section

Preparation of PDP PNPs

First, tetrahydrofuran (THF) was applied to dissolve 5.0 mg of PDP and 1.0 mg of PSMA to make their respective solutions (1.0 mg/mL). Subsequently, the obtained PDP and PSMA solutions were sufficiently mixed for 2.0 h and further injected into deionized water (10 mL). Next, the resultant mixed solution was heated under an air atmosphere at 80 °C until THF was completely evaporated to obtain a PDP PNP dispersion. Scheme A plots the preparation procedure of PDP PNPs.

Preparation of the β-CD-Pt Nanocomposite

Briefly, 1.0 mg of β-CD was dissolved in deionized water with vigorous sonication to form 1.0 mg/mL β-CD solution. Then, 10 μL of H2PtCl6 (1%) was added to the β-CD solution and the mixture was intensely stirred overnight. Thereafter, 25 μL of NaBH4 (0.01 M) was slowly added into the above mixed solution to react for 20 min under stirring. Then, 10 μL of sodium citrate (0.01 M) was added and the mixture was continuously stirred for 30 min to form the β-CD-Pt nanocomposite, which was collected by centrifuging at 10 000 rpm and washing with water three times. Finally, the collected β-CD-Pt was dispersed in 1.0 mL of water to obtain its dispersion. As a control, the Pt nanoparticles (Pt NPs) were prepared according to the above reduction method in the absence of β-CD.

Preparation of the TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2 Composite

The preparation procedure of the secondary antibody complex (TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2) is depicted in Scheme B. Briefly, 4.0 μL of TDBA, 400 μL of β-CD-Pt dispersion, and 40 μL of Ab2 (50 μg/mL) were mixed and reacted under 4.0 °C for 14 h to form the TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2 nanocomposite. Then, the remaining active sites of TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2 were blocked by incubating BSA (1%, 100 μL) with the nanocomposite for 40 min. Finally, the resultant TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2 was centrifuged at 8000 rpm and washed three times using 0.10 M PBS (pH 7.4) and further dispersed in 400 μL of 0.10 M PBS (pH 7.4). The obtained product was stored at 4.0 °C for later use.

Fabrication of the ECL Immunosensor

After being polished with alumina (0.3 and 0.05 μm) and ultrasonically cleaned alternately using pure water and ethanol, the GCE (Φ = 4.0 mm) was covered with the PDP PNP dispersion (10 μL) and naturally dried at room temperature. Then, the carboxyl groups of PDP PNPs were activated by incubating the electrode with EDC/NHS (v/v 4:1, 10 μL) for 1.0 h at room temperature. Hereafter, the first antibody (Ab1, 10 μL) was incubated on the modified electrode for 14 h at 4.0 °C. Then, BSA (1%, 10 μL) was further incubated on a modified electrode for 1.0 h to block remnant binding sites of PDP PNPs to obtain the ECL immunosensor (Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE). PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4) was used to wash the electrodes in each modification step. The preparation process is depicted in Scheme C.

ECL Measurement

The immunosensor (Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE) was incubated with different concentrations of ncovNP at 37 °C for 1.0 h, and then the TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2 bioconjugate was captured by incubating it on the electrode surface at 37 °C for 1.0 h to construct a sandwich structure. The modified GCE as a working electrode, platinum wire as a counter electrode, and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode formed a three-electrode system to record the ECL signals. The ECL detection was performed in 0.10 M of PBS (3.0 mL, pH 7.4). The scanning potential was from 0 V to +1.5 V and the scanning rate and the photomultiplier tube (PMT) were set to 300 mV/s and 800 V, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Morphologies and Element Characterization of Nanomaterials

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the prepared nanomaterials were recorded to observe their morphologies. Figure A depicts the TEM images of PDP PNPs, which exhibit a spherical shape with an average diameter of 103 nm. Figure B shows the SEM images of Pt NPs, which reveal the dissociative Pt NPs with an average size of about 30 nm. Figure C is the TEM images of the β-CD-Pt nanocomposite and shows a large number of Pt NPs. The assembly and arrangement of Pt NPs clearly revealed the cavity structure of the circinate shape of β-CD, indicating that Pt NPs were grown in situ on the coordination sites for the metal ions of β-CD. Moreover, the energy-dispersive scanning (EDS) mapping was employed to ensure the elemental distribution of β-CD-Pt. Figure D displays the EDS mapping of C, N, O, and Pt elements. It was demonstrated that Pt NPs were assembled on the β-CD molecules.
Figure 1

(A) TEM images of PDP PNPs. (B) SEM images of Pt NPs. (C) TEM images of β-CD-Pt and (D) the corresponding elemental mapping of C, N, O, and Pt. XPS spectra of (E) PDP PNPs and (F) β-CD-Pt.

(A) TEM images of PDP PNPs. (B) SEM images of Pt NPs. (C) TEM images of β-CD-Pt and (D) the corresponding elemental mapping of C, N, O, and Pt. XPS spectra of (E) PDP PNPs and (F) β-CD-Pt. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of PDP PNPs and β-CD-Pt was explored to further ensure their element distribution. Figure E clearly depicts the characteristic peaks of C 1s and O 1s from PDP PNPs. The corresponding XPS spectrum of each element with various bonds is shown in Figure S1A,B, respectively. As seen, the binding energies of C–C, C–O, and C=O of C 1s are 284.88, 286.29, and 287.6 eV, respectively (Figure S1A), and the binding energies of C–O and C=O in O 1s are 532.49 and 533.68 eV, respectively (Figure S1B). The existence of the C=O covalent bond indicates that PDP PNPs were successfully functionalized with carboxyl groups. Figure F depicts the XPS characteristic peaks of C, O, N, and Pt elements in β-CD-Pt. The corresponding bonding characteristic peaks of N 1s and Pt 4f are displayed in Figure S1C,D, respectively. The binding energies of Pt–N, C–N, and N–H in N 1s are found to be 398.28, 399.56, and 401.37 eV, respectively (Figure S1C), and the binding energies of Pt–N 4f7/2 and Pt–N 4f5/2 can be observed to be 72.53 and 76.5 eV, respectively (Figure S1D). The XPS characteristic peaks from β-CD-Pt demonstrate the successful preparation of β-CD-Pt. In addition, the preparation of PDP PNPs was further characterized by Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) and ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) absorption spectra, and the corresponding results are shown in Figure S2A,B in the Supporting Information, respectively. Meanwhile, the fluorescence (FL) excitation wavelength, the emission wavelength, and the ECL spectrum of PDP PNPs were explored, and the results are depicted in Figure S2C. Figure S2D displays the three-dimensional surface image of ECL from PDP PNPs. See the Supporting Information for the detailed discussion concerning Figure S2A–D. The FT-IR, UV–vis absorption, and FL spectrum results further demonstrate the successful preparation of PDP PNPs. The dispersibility in water and luminescence stability of PDP PNPs were also explored, and Figure S3 depicts the results. The detailed discussion is presented in the Supporting Information.

ECL Mechanism

The ECL behaviors of different materials including PDP PNPs, β-CD-Pt, β-CD, and Pt NPs were investigated using their corresponding modified electrodes in 0.10 M PBS (pH 7.4). Figure A,B depicts the ECL signals without and with 5.7 mM TDBA in PBS, respectively. As seen, whether or not co-reactant TDBA was present, almost no ECL signals were detected at β-CD-Pt/GCE (curve b), β-CD/GCE (curve c), and Pt NPs/GCE (curve d). However, the PDP PNPs/GCE exhibited a weak ECL signal (Figure A, curve a) in the absence of TDBA and a strong ECL response at +1.5 V in the presence of TDBA (Figure B, curve a), indicating that the detected ECL emission originated from PDP PNPs, not β-CD or Pt NPs. Moreover, it was also revealed that TDBA can act as a co-reactant to enhance the ECL signal of PDP PNPs. Meanwhile, the effect of PSMA on the ECL signal of the prepared PDP PNPs was confirmed by comparing the ECL responses of PDP nanoparticles with and without PSMA, and the corresponding descriptions are presented in the Supporting Information and the results are given in Figure S4.
Figure 2

(A) ECL responses of differently modified electrodes (A) without and (B) with 5.7 mM TDBA: (a) PDP PNPs/GCE, (b) β-CD-Pt/GCE, (c) β-CD/GCE, and (d) Pt NPs/GCE. (C) ECL stability of (a) PDP PNPs/GCE with 5.7 mM TDBA and (b) TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. (D) ECL signals of (a) TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE and (b) TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. (E) Anodic DPV profiles of (a) bare GCE with 5.7 mM TDBA, (b) TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE, and (c) TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. (F) EPR spectra of (a) TDBA-β-CD-Pt and (b) TDBA-Pt under light irradiation. Detection solution of PBS (3.0 mL, 0.10 M, pH 7.4) and the scanning rate of 300 mV/s for ECL and 100 mV/s for DPV.

(A) ECL responses of differently modified electrodes (A) without and (B) with 5.7 mM TDBA: (a) PDP PNPs/GCE, (b) β-CD-Pt/GCE, (c) β-CD/GCE, and (d) Pt NPs/GCE. (C) ECL stability of (a) PDP PNPs/GCE with 5.7 mM TDBA and (b) TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. (D) ECL signals of (a) TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE and (b) TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. (E) Anodic DPV profiles of (a) bare GCE with 5.7 mM TDBA, (b) TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE, and (c) TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. (F) EPR spectra of (a) TDBA-β-CD-Pt and (b) TDBA-Pt under light irradiation. Detection solution of PBS (3.0 mL, 0.10 M, pH 7.4) and the scanning rate of 300 mV/s for ECL and 100 mV/s for DPV. We compared the stability of ECL signals with the co-reactant TDBA added to the detection solution and immobilized onto the electrode surface. Figure C depicts the corresponding results. For TDBA (5.7 mM) in PBS, the ECL signals under successive potential scanning for 10 cycles were recorded at PDP PNPs/GCE, and the results are plotted in Figure C (curve a). When TDBA was immobilized on the GCE, the ECL signal was detected at the biosensor TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE. The results are presented in Figure C (curve b). As observed, curve a shows decreasing ECL signals as the number of cyclic scans increases and the relative standard deviation (RSD) is 12.9%. However, curve b shows a stable ECL emission under the same number of cyclic scans, and the corresponding RSD was 4.06%, which revealed the superiority of immobilizing TDBA onto the electrode by the β-CD-Pt nanocomposite. The amplification effect of β-CD on the ECL emission of PDP PNPs was further explored. As a comparison, TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE without β-CD was also constructed using the same assembly method as the biosensor (TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE) by substituting TDBA-Pt for TDBA-β-CD-Pt. As seen from Figure D, the ECL signal strength without β-CD was about 1978 a.u. (curve b). Nevertheless, the ECL signal strength of the biosensor with β-CD was about 9760 a.u., showing nearly fivefold enhancement than that without β-CD. It was demonstrated that our developed hydrophobic localized enrichment strategy of the co-reactant TDBA utilizing the hydrophobic cavity of β-CD could significantly enhance ECL emission and improve the detection sensitivity. The electrochemical oxidation of co-reactant TDBA on different modified electrodes was explored using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). First, the DPV profile in the case of TDBA being added to PBS was explored using the bare GCE, and the result is plotted in Figure E (curve a). A strong oxidation peak of TDBA was detected at +0.90 V, which was assigned to the production of TDBA• during the positive potential scanning. Subsequently, the DPV profile in the case of TDBA being immobilized by hydrophobic localized enrichment and covalent bonding was explored using TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE, and the result is plotted in Figure E (curve b), which shows a relatively strong oxidation peak at +0.90 V. Finally, the DPV profile with TDBA being immobilized only by covalent bonding (Pt–N bond) was also explored using TDBA-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE, and the result is plotted in Figure E (curve c), which shows a dramatically decreased oxidation peak in the absence of β-CD. The above experiments confirmed that the hydrophobic cavity of β-CD could effectively enrich TDBA to produce more TDBA•, thus improving ECL emission from PDP PNPs. In addition, the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) was performed using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) as TDBA radical scavenger to further confirm the hydrophobic localized enrichment of TDBA by β-CD. As seen from Figure F, under light irradiation, the EPR signal from the DMPO–TDBA adduct in the presence of β-CD is stronger than that without β-CD, indicating that β-CD with an inner hydrophobic cavity could effectively enrich TDBA. The possible ECL mechanism of the biosensor may be supposed as follows. First, the PDP PNPs and co-reactant TDBA were electro-oxidized to generate PDP PNPs•+ and TDBA•, respectively. In the absence of β-CD (Scheme , without β-CD), less TDBA would be produced when TDBA• was immobilized only by covalent bonding (Pt–N bond), and then less TDBA would be produced through loss proton (H+), thereby producing less excited species PDP PNPs*. Remarkably, in the presence of β-CD (Scheme , with β-CD), more TDBA• would be generated due to the hydrophobic interaction between TDBA and β-CD, and then TDBA• would lose H+ to produce more TDBA, which further crashed with PDP PNPs to form abundant PDP PNPs*, thus significantly promoting the ECL emission of the PDP PNPs/TDBA system.
Scheme 2

ECL Mechanisms of PDP PNPs/TDBA System without and with β-CD

Optimization of Experimental Conditions

Both cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were applied to confirm the successful assembly of the biosensor (TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE), and Figure S5A,B plots the corresponding results, respectively. The corresponding discussions were described in the Supporting Information. The optimization of experimental conditions is necessary for the analysis and application of the biosensor. In this work, the pH of PBS, the concentration of Ab2, and the incubation time for ncovNP and Ab2 were optimized using the biosensor TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE with 1.0 ng/mL ncovNP. Figure A plots the change of response signal with pH. It was observed that the ECL signal went up with increasing pH from 4.0 to 7.4, reaching its maximum at pH 7.4. The ECL intensity decreased gradually as pH exceeded 7.4. This phenomenon may be explained as the physiological pH is beneficial to the maintenance of bioactivity of the antibody and the antigen.
Figure 3

Effect of (A) pH of PBS, incubation time for (B) ncovNP and (C) Ab2, and (D) concentration of Ab2 on the ECL response at the biosensor incubated with 1.0 ng/mL ncovNP in PBS (3.0 mL, 0.10 M, pH 7.4). Scanning rate: 300 mV/s.

Effect of (A) pH of PBS, incubation time for (B) ncovNP and (C) Ab2, and (D) concentration of Ab2 on the ECL response at the biosensor incubated with 1.0 ng/mL ncovNP in PBS (3.0 mL, 0.10 M, pH 7.4). Scanning rate: 300 mV/s. Figure B,C plots changes in response signal with the incubation time of ncovNP and Ab2, respectively. As seen, the response signal gradually increased with the increasing incubation time and reached the maximum at 60 min. When the incubation time exceeded 60 min, the ECL intensity dropped slightly and gradually stabilized. Thus, the incubation time of 60 min was considered as the optimal incubation time for ncovNP and Ab2 in this work. Figure D plots the change in the response signal with the concentration of Ab2. As seen, the ECL intensity increased as the concentration of Ab2 ranged from 1.0 to 50 μg/mL. When the concentration exceeded 50 μg/mL, the ECL intensity decreased slightly and gradually stabilized. Thus, the concentration of 50 μg/mL was viewed as the optimizing concentration of Ab2 in this work. Furthermore, the amplification effects of different amines on the ECL emission of luminophore PDP PNPs were explored. The results are depicted in Figure S6 and the detailed discussions are presented in the Supporting Information. The results indicated that TDBA was an optimal co-reactant for PDP PNPs.

Analytical Performance of the Immunosensor

The application of ECL biosensor was first explored by quantitative bioassay of target ncovNP, and the results are plotted in Figure A,B. The ECL response in 3.0 mL of PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4) gradually enlarged as the concentrations of ncovNP ranged from 50 fg/mL to 1.0 ng/mL. Over this concentration range, the ECL intensity showed a good linear relationship with the logarithm of the concentration, and the detection limit as low as 22 fg/mL was obtained at the biosensor with a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 3. The detailed calculation is presented in the Supporting Information. Compared to other works for ncovNP detection, the proposed ECL biosensor had a wider linear range and a lower detection limit. The comparison is depicted in Table .
Figure 4

(A) ECL response of the biosensor TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE toward ncovNP (a) to (g): 50, 100 fg/mL, 1.0, 10, 100 pg/mL, 500 pg/mL, and 1.0 ng/mL. (B) Calibration curve for ncovNP detection. (C) ECL response to ncovNP (1 ng/mL) alone, blank sample, 100 ng/mL of interfering substance (BSA, CEA, and AFP) alone, and their mixtures in 3.0 mL of PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4). (D) Stability of the biosensor with ncovNP (100 pg/mL). Scanning rate: 300 mV/s.

Table 1

Comparison of the Analytical Performance of Different ncovNP Detection Strategies

detection methodlinear rangeLODrefs
immunochromatographic sensor0.05–1.6 ng/mL0.026 ng/mL(27)
fluorescent immunoassay0–120 ng/mL0.33 ng/mL(28)
voltammetric-based Immunosensor100 ng/mL–1.0 pg/mL0.4 pg/mL(29)
half-strip lateral flow assay0.53–0.77 ng/mL0.65 ng/mL(30)
electrochemical immunosensor0.1 pg/mL–1 μg/mL0.8 pg/mL(1)
ECL immunosensor50 fg/mL–1.0 ng/mL22 fg/mLthis work
(A) ECL response of the biosensor TDBA-β-CD-Pt@Ab2/ncovNP/Ab1/PDP PNPs/GCE toward ncovNP (a) to (g): 50, 100 fg/mL, 1.0, 10, 100 pg/mL, 500 pg/mL, and 1.0 ng/mL. (B) Calibration curve for ncovNP detection. (C) ECL response to ncovNP (1 ng/mL) alone, blank sample, 100 ng/mL of interfering substance (BSA, CEA, and AFP) alone, and their mixtures in 3.0 mL of PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4). (D) Stability of the biosensor with ncovNP (100 pg/mL). Scanning rate: 300 mV/s. The selectivity of the biosensor was further investigated in the case of BSA, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and α-fetoprotein (AFP) as possible interfering substances. The ECL responses of the modified electrode toward target ncovNP (1.0 ng/mL), blank sample, selected interfering substance with a concentration of 100-fold ncovNP, and their mixtures were measured in 3.0 mL of PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4). The results are shown in Figure C. As plotted, a strong ECL signal was observed in the case of ncovNP (1.0 ng/mL) alone and the mixtures containing ncovNP (1.0 ng/mL) and interfering substances. Moreover, the response was almost identical in both cases. Compared with the response toward ncovNP (1.0 ng/mL), the response to the interfering substances can be ignored, demonstrating good selectivity of the biosensor for ncovNP. Stability is very important for the biosensor. The ECL signals at the biosensor incubated with 100 pg/mL ncovNP were recorded during 10 cycles of continuous potential scanning, and Figure D plots the results. As seen, the ECL response showed no significant change, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.95% was obtained, showing acceptable stability of the proposed ECL biosensor. The reproducibility was also explored. The four biosensors constructed in the same batch and in different batches were used to perform the intra-assays and interassays in 3.0 mL of PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4), respectively, and the results are shown in Figure S7. The RSDs in the intra-assays and interassays were 3.79 and 3.32%, respectively, demonstrating a favorable reproducibility of the proposed ECL biosensor.

Analysis of Real Serum Samples

To test the practicality of our constructed biosensors, recovery experiments were performed in serum using a standard addition method. The concentration of ncovNP in diluted serum with 50 fold was evaluated. Subsequently, ncovNP was added in three different concentrations in diluted serum to detect the recovery rates. As presented in Table S1, the recovery rates were in the range of 98.0–99.2%, indicating that the ECL platform was feasible for detecting ncovNP in real serum samples.

Conclusions

In this work, β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) with an inner hydrophobic cavity was innovatively developed to achieve a hydrophobic localized enrichment of co-reactant TDBA. Meanwhile, the coordination sites for metal ions of β-CD make it easy for Pt NPs to grow in situ on β-CD, which also could achieve the immobilization of TDBA via the Pt–N bond. The synergy of two forces, namely, hydrophobic localized enrichment and covalent bonding, resulted in a high loading of TDBA on the electrode surface. Meanwhile, the novel PDP PNPs with excellent ECL performance opened up a promising ECL polymer luminophore. The integration of the TDBA-β-CD-Pt nanocomposite and PDP PNPs achieved a sensitive detection of ncovNP, providing a new method for ncovNP. More importantly, β-CD shared with an inspiration in hydrophobic localized enrichment of co-reactants for improving the sensitivity of ECL detection.
  27 in total

1.  Electrochemiluminescent Imaging for Multi-immunoassay Sensitized by Dual DNA Amplification of Polymer Dot Signal.

Authors:  Ningning Wang; Yaqiang Feng; Yawei Wang; Huangxian Ju; Feng Yan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A novel electrochemiluminescence aptasensor based on in situ generated proline and matrix polyamidoamine dendrimers as coreactants for signal amplication.

Authors:  Yali Yuan; Xianxue Gan; Yaqin Chai; Ruo Yuan
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Discovery of sandwich type COVID-19 nucleocapsid protein DNA aptamers.

Authors:  Liyun Zhang; Xiaona Fang; Xingbo Liu; Huichao Ou; Haiyan Zhang; Jinjun Wang; Qian Li; Huanyi Cheng; Wenyi Zhang; Zhaofeng Luo
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Rim Binding of Cyclodextrins in Size-Sensitive Guest Recognition.

Authors:  Hiroki Hanayama; Junya Yamada; Issei Tomotsuka; Koji Harano; Eiichi Nakamura
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Bipolar Aggregation-Induced Electrochemiluminescence of Thiophene-Fused Conjugated Microporous Polymers.

Authors:  Lin Cui; Jinghua Zhou; Chen-Chen Li; Shengyuan Deng; Wenqiang Gao; Xiaomei Zhang; Xiliang Luo; Xiaolei Wang; Chun-Yang Zhang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans.

Authors:  Fatima Amanat; Daniel Stadlbauer; Shirin Strohmeier; Thi H O Nguyen; Veronika Chromikova; Meagan McMahon; Kaijun Jiang; Guha Asthagiri Arunkumar; Denise Jurczyszak; Jose Polanco; Maria Bermudez-Gonzalez; Giulio Kleiner; Teresa Aydillo; Lisa Miorin; Daniel S Fierer; Luz Amarilis Lugo; Erna Milunka Kojic; Jonathan Stoever; Sean T H Liu; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Philip L Felgner; Thomas Moran; Adolfo García-Sastre; Daniel Caplivski; Allen C Cheng; Katherine Kedzierska; Olli Vapalahti; Jussi M Hepojoki; Viviana Simon; Florian Krammer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Antigen-Detecting Half-Strip Lateral Flow Assay Toward the Development of Point of Care Tests Using Commercially Available Reagents.

Authors:  Benjamin D Grant; Caitlin E Anderson; John R Williford; Luis F Alonzo; Veronika A Glukhova; David S Boyle; Bernhard H Weigl; Kevin P Nichols
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Development of a Low-Cost Cotton-Tipped Electrochemical Immunosensor for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Shimaa Eissa; Mohammed Zourob
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Horseradish peroxidase-triggered direct in situ fluorescent immunoassay platform for sensing cardiac troponin I and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in serum.

Authors:  Jinhua Liu; Guotong Ruan; Wenlin Ma; Yujie Sun; Haidong Yu; Zhihui Xu; Changmin Yu; Hai Li; Cheng-Wu Zhang; Lin Li
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 12.545

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent trends and advancements in electrochemiluminescence biosensors for human virus detection.

Authors:  Ebtesam Sobhanie; Foad Salehnia; Guobao Xu; Yalda Hamidipanah; Shayesteh Arshian; Ali Firoozbakhtian; Morteza Hosseini; Mohammad Reza Ganjali; Saima Hanif
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 14.908

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.