Literature DB >> 35230691

Patient-Derived In Vitro and In Vivo Models of Cancer.

Sally E Claridge1, Julie-Ann Cavallo1, Benjamin D Hopkins2.   

Abstract

Over the last two decades, cancer researchers have taken the promise offered by the Human Genome Project and have expanded its capacity to use sequencing to identify the genomic alterations that give rise to and sustain individual tumors. This expansion has allowed researchers to identify and target highly recurrent alterations in specific cancer contexts, such as EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (Lynch et al, N Engl J Med 350:2129-2139, 2004; Sharifnia et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:18661-18666, 2014), BCR-ABL translocations in chronic myeloid leukemia (Deininger, Pharmacol Rev 55:401-423. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.55.3.4 , 2003; Druker et al, N Engl J Med 344. 1038-1042, 2001; Druker et al, N Engl J Med 344:1031-1037. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200104053441401 , 2001), or HER2 amplifications in breast cancer (Slamon et al, N Engl J Med 344:783-792. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200103153441101 , 2001; Solca et al, Beyond trastuzumab: second-generation targeted therapies for HER-2-positive breast cancer. In: Sibilia M, Zielinski CC, Bartsch R, Grunt TW (eds) Drugs for HER-2-positive breast cancer. Springer, Basel, pp 91-107, 2011). Despite these advances in our capacity to identify the genetic alterations that drive tumor initiation, survival, and proliferation, our ability to target these alterations to provide effective treatment options for patients in need, particularly those with rare or advanced cancers, remains limited (Gould et al, Nat Med 21:431-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3853 , 2015). Patient-derived models of cancer offer one potential mechanism to overcome this barrier between the bench and bedside. Through the development and testing of patient-derived models of cancer, functional genomics efforts can identify tumor-specific drug sensitivities and thereby provide a connection between tumor genetics and effective therapeutics for patients in need of treatment options.Recognizing that cancer is a multifaceted set of disease states, the development of personalized models of cancer that can be used to compare treatment options, identify tumor-specific vulnerabilities, and guide clinical decision-making has tremendous potential for improving patient outcomes. This chapter will describe a representative set of patient-derived models of cancer, reviewing each of their strengths and weaknesses and highlighting how selecting a model to suit a specific question or context is critical. Each model comes with a unique set of pros and cons, making them more or less appropriate for each specific research or clinical question. As each model can be leveraged to gain new insights into cancer biology, the key to their deployment is to identify the most appropriate model for a specific context, while carefully considering the strengths and limitations of the selected model. When used appropriately, patient-derived models may prove to be the missing link needed to bring the promise of personalized oncology to fruition in the clinic.
© 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air interface cultures; Cancer; Cancer cell lines; Functional genomics; High-throughput drug screening; Organ-on-a-chip; Organoids; Patient-derived models of cancer; Patient-derived xenografts; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor slice cultures; Tumor-specific drug sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230691     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91836-1_12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  105 in total

1.  Translational value of mouse models in oncology drug development.

Authors:  Stephen E Gould; Melissa R Junttila; Frederic J de Sauvage
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Microenvironmental regulation of therapeutic response in cancer.

Authors:  Florian Klemm; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Genetic modifiers of EGFR dependence in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tanaz Sharifnia; Victor Rusu; Federica Piccioni; Mukta Bagul; Marcin Imielinski; Andrew D Cherniack; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Bang Wong; Frederick H Wilson; Levi A Garraway; David Altshuler; Todd R Golub; David E Root; Aravind Subramanian; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  B J Druker; M Talpaz; D J Resta; B Peng; E Buchdunger; J M Ford; N B Lydon; H Kantarjian; R Capdeville; S Ohno-Jones; C L Sawyers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome.

Authors:  B J Druker; C L Sawyers; H Kantarjian; D J Resta; S F Reese; J M Ford; R Capdeville; M Talpaz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Mutation of Pten/Mmac1 in mice causes neoplasia in multiple organ systems.

Authors:  K Podsypanina; L H Ellenson; A Nemes; J Gu; M Tamura; K M Yamada; C Cordon-Cardo; G Catoretti; P E Fisher; R Parsons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Specific targeted therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia with imatinib.

Authors:  Michael W N Deininger; Brian J Druker
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

Authors:  Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Predicting drug susceptibility of non-small cell lung cancers based on genetic lesions.

Authors:  Martin L Sos; Kathrin Michel; Thomas Zander; Jonathan Weiss; Peter Frommolt; Martin Peifer; Danan Li; Roland Ullrich; Mirjam Koker; Florian Fischer; Takeshi Shimamura; Daniel Rauh; Craig Mermel; Stefanie Fischer; Isabel Stückrath; Stefanie Heynck; Rameen Beroukhim; William Lin; Wendy Winckler; Kinjal Shah; Thomas LaFramboise; Whei F Moriarty; Megan Hanna; Laura Tolosi; Jörg Rahnenführer; Roel Verhaak; Derek Chiang; Gad Getz; Martin Hellmich; Jürgen Wolf; Luc Girard; Michael Peyton; Barbara A Weir; Tzu-Hsiu Chen; Heidi Greulich; Jordi Barretina; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Levi A Garraway; Adi F Gazdar; John D Minna; Matthew Meyerson; Kwok-Kin Wong; Roman K Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth P Olive; Michael A Jacobetz; Christian J Davidson; Aarthi Gopinathan; Dominick McIntyre; Davina Honess; Basetti Madhu; Mae A Goldgraben; Meredith E Caldwell; David Allard; Kristopher K Frese; Gina Denicola; Christine Feig; Chelsea Combs; Stephen P Winter; Heather Ireland-Zecchini; Stefanie Reichelt; William J Howat; Alex Chang; Mousumi Dhara; Lifu Wang; Felix Rückert; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Kamel Izeradjene; Sunil R Hingorani; Pearl Huang; Susan E Davies; William Plunkett; Merrill Egorin; Ralph H Hruban; Nigel Whitebread; Karen McGovern; Julian Adams; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; John Griffiths; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.