Literature DB >> 35230628

Level-specific residuals and diagnostic measures, plots, and tests for random effects selection in multilevel and mixed models.

Sun-Joo Cho1, Paul De Boeck2,3, Matthew Naveiras4, Hope Ervin5.   

Abstract

Multilevel data structures are often found in multiple substantive research areas, and multilevel models (MLMs) have been widely used to allow for such multilevel data structures. One important step when applying MLM is the selection of an optimal set of random effects to account for variability and heteroscedasticity in multilevel data. Literature reviews on current practices in applying MLM showed that diagnostic plots are only rarely used for model selection and for model checking. In this study, possible random effects and a generic description of the random effects were provided to guide researchers to select necessary random effects. In addition, based on extensive literature reviews, level-specific diagnostic plots were presented using various kinds of level-specific residuals, and diagnostic measures and statistical tests were suggested to select a set of random effects. Existing and newly proposed methods were illustrated using two data sets: a cross-sectional data set and a longitudinal data set. Along with the illustration, we discuss the methods and provide guidelines to select necessary random effects in model-building steps. R code was provided for the analyses.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic plots; Level-specific residuals; Mixed-effects model; Multilevel model; Random effect selection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230628     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01709-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  7 in total

1.  Influence analysis for linear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I.

Authors:  J DURBIN; G S WATSON
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 3.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Local influence in linear mixed models.

Authors:  E Lesaffre; G Verbeke
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparing the Performance of Approaches for Testing the Homogeneity of Variance Assumption in One-Factor ANOVA Models.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Patricia Rodríguez de Gil; Yi-Hsin Chen; Jeffrey D Kromrey; Eun Sook Kim; Thanh Pham; Diep Nguyen; Jeanine L Romano
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Imipramine: clinical effects and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  N Reisby; L F Gram; P Bech; A Nagy; G O Petersen; J Ortmann; I Ibsen; S J Dencker; O Jacobsen; O Krautwald; I Sondergaard; J Christiansen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.