Literature DB >> 35230383

Alveolar bone thickness and height changes following incisor retraction treatment with microimplants.

Bui Quang Hung, Mihee Hong, Hee-Moon Kyung, Ho-Jin Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate alveolar bone remodeling following incisor retraction treatment with microimplants and to examine the relationship between crown/root distal movement and thickness/height changes of the alveolus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients (mean age, 19.29 ± 4.64 years) with bialveolar protrusion treated by incisor retraction with microimplants were included. The distances of the crown and root tip movements as well as the thickness (alveolar bone thickness [ABT]; labial, lingual, and total) and vertical level (vertical bone level [VBL]; labial and lingual) of the alveolar bone were assessed using cone-beam computed tomography images obtained before treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2). All T1 and T2 variables were compared, and further comparisons of alveolar bone changes were conducted between the two groups based on the distance of the crown (low-crown-movement and high-crown-movement groups) and root movements (low-root-movement and high-root-movement groups). To determine the correlation of the crown or root movement with the variables of alveolar bone changes, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in all VBL and ABT variables after treatment in both jaws but not in total ABT. Based on the crown and root movements, alveolar bone change significantly differed between the root-movement groups, whereas there was no significant difference between the crown-movement groups. In addition, root movement showed significant correlations with the variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Remarkable changes in the height and thickness of alveolar bone were found after microimplant-aided incisor retraction treatment in all groups except for total ABT. Root movement was significantly correlated with the alveolar bone changes.
© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar bone remodeling; CBCT; Incisor retraction; Microimplant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230383      PMCID: PMC9235383          DOI: 10.2319/091121-702.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.684


  21 in total

1.  Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion.

Authors:  H S Park; S M Bae; H M Kyung; J H Sung
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2001-07

2.  The effect of antero-postero incisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminagraphy.

Authors:  A Ten Hoeve; R M Mulie
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1976-11

3.  A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  J G Edwards
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1976-03

4.  Anatomical Limits for Distalization of Lower Posterior Molars with Micro-Implant Anchorage.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Kim; Woon-Seok Jang; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2019

Review 5.  Comparison of the effects of mini-implant and traditional anchorage on patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Authors:  Yanhua Xu; Jiye Xie
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Faciolingual tooth movement: its influence on the root and cortical plate.

Authors:  W M Wainwright
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1973-09

7.  Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  R A Fuhrmann; H Wehrbein; H J Langen; P R Diedrich
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Periodontal conditions after facial root tipping and palatal root torque of incisors.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; R A Fuhrmann; P R Diedrich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth.

Authors:  Simten Sarikaya; Bülent Haydar; Semra Ciğer; Macit Ariyürek
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements.

Authors:  A D Vardimon; E Oren; Y Ben-Bassat
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.