Literature DB >> 35230008

Association of discharge policy with the length of hospital stay among patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study.

Kamil Polok1, Karolina Górka, Tomasz Stachura, Natalia Celejewska-Wójcik, Sabina Lichołai, Katarzyna Bućko-Głód, Gabriela Adamus, Anna Kozłowska, Aleksandra Baraniec, Olga Buczma, Krzysztof Sładek.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the association between discharge policy and hospital stay length, and to evaluate the factors related to duration of viral clearance among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test who were admitted to hospital. The participants were divided into the test-based (TB) policy group or symptom-based (SB) group depending on the policy valid at their hospital discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the factors related to the duration of hospital stay and viral clearance.
RESULTS: The study involved 305 patients (66.6% men). The mean age was 60.9 (15.2) years. TB and SB policy groups consisted of 145 (47.5%) and 160 patients (52.5%), respectively. The TB group had significantly longer duration of hospital stay (21.0 vs 16.0, P=0.003). In multivariable analysis, SB policy was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay (β-coefficient -5.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.78 to -1.96, P=0.003). Longer viral clearance was associated with older age (β-coefficient 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51, P<0.001) and history of cough in the pre-hospital phase of the disease (5.96, 95% CI 0.64 to 11.29, P = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: SB discharge policy is preferable in the context of limited resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230008      PMCID: PMC8895328     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overburdened national health care systems on a scale not experienced since the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918-1920 (1-3). Between November 2019 and February 2022, over 405 million people worldwide were diagnosed with the disease and more than 5.8 million people died. An enormous effort by clinicians and researchers since the beginning of the pandemic resulted in the development of life-saving treatments and effective vaccines (1-7). Duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance affects isolation length. It may also impede patients` access to further medical care (8) since many outpatient and inpatient facilities require a negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for admission. This may considerably delay the diagnosis and management of time-sensitive and life-threatening diseases. Therefore, there is a need to identify factors associated with prolonged viral shedding. During a crisis, health care systems need to optimally manage limited human and equipment resources (9). During the COVID-19 pandemic, various policies have been suggested regarding discharge of patients from isolation and hospital wards. In Poland, the policy based on obtaining two consecutive negative RT-PCR tests was in September 2020 replaced by a policy based on the presence and duration of symptoms. We hypothesized that discharge policy was associated with patients` outcomes, particularly the length of hospital stay. We aimed to assess the association between the two discharge policies and duration of hospital stay in patients with COVID-19. Additionally, we evaluated the factors related to the time of viral clearance.

Patients and methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study was performed between March and October 2020 in a single tertiary center (Department of Pulmonology and Allergology, University Hospital in Kraków). The patients signed a written consent for study participation. The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Jagiellonian University Ethics Committee (KBET 1072.6120.145.2020).

Patients and data collection

The study enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by an RT-PCR test. The exclusion criterion was transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU). We gathered demographic and clinical information based on an interview and an analysis of medical records. We also recorded the results of laboratory tests and imaging studies performed on hospital admission. In-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, and hospital stay length were assessed.

Subgroups and outcomes

Patients were divided into two groups depending on the policy valid at hospital discharge. From March 2020 until September 1, 2020, Polish regulations stipulated that patients with confirmed COVID-19 can be released from isolation after receiving two consecutive negative nasopharyngeal-swab RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 at an interval of at least 24 hours (test-based [TB] policy). Patients were discharged from hospital when they met the mentioned criterion or when they were able to isolate themselves from healthy housemates. We recorded viral shedding time, defined as the interval from symptoms onset to receiving two consecutive negative RT-PCR tests within 24 hours. Viral shedding was assessed solely from nasopharyngeal swabs and not from other viral RNA sources, such as stool samples. One of the authors contacted the patients discharged with a positive RT-PCR test by phone or checked the national database to gather information about the date of release from isolation. According to the local protocol, the first RT-PCR test was performed seven days after hospital admission. If the result was positive or unclear, the patient was re-tested every seventh day until a first negative result. If the test was negative, the patient was retested on the following day. Since September 1, 2020, patients were released from isolation or discharged after at least three days from symptoms resolution and at least 13 days from symptoms onset (symptom-based [SB] policy). Isolation of immunocompromised patients could be prolonged at the clinician's discretion. Patients were discharged if they met the mentioned criteria or were able to isolate themselves from healthy housemates. In this group, control RT-PCR tests were not routinely performed. For some analyses, patients were divided according to disease severity into non-severely ill (patients who did not develop respiratory failure in the course of COVID-19), severely ill (patients who developed respiratory failure but were not transferred to ICU), and critically ill (patients who required transfer to ICU due to respiratory failure).

Statistical analysis

Qualitative variables are presented as counts (%), while quantitative variables are presented as medians (interquartile range) or means (standard deviation). Continuous variables were compared by using the t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Correlation between non-parametric variables was assessed by using the Spearman Rank test. A multivariable analysis of factors associated with the length of hospital stay and duration of viral shedding was performed by using a linear regression model. The variables included in both models were selected according to the available data and according to the authors` knowledge. Independent variables included in the analysis of factors associated with the length of hospital stay were discharge policy, age, development of respiratory failure throughout the hospital stay, obesity, hypertension, baseline Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and steroid administration. Independent variables included in the analysis of factors associated with the duration of viral shedding were age, history of cough in the pre-hospital phase of the disease, body mass index (BMI), development of respiratory failure throughout the hospital stay, diabetes, hypertension, presence of lesions in the chest x-ray, and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration. This was a complete-case analysis. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was performed with R, version 3.6.0 (R Project, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

Study population

The study enrolled 305 patients (203 or 66.6% men). The mean age was 60.9 (15.2) years. TB policy was applied in 145 patients (47.5%), while SB policy was applied in 160 patients (52.5%). Selected demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of test-based (TB) and symptoms-based (SB) discharge group*†

CharacteristicsEntire cohort
(n = 305)TB policy
(n = 145)SB policy
(n = 160)P
Age; mean (SD)
60.9 (15.2)
60.6 (16.6)
61.1 (13.8)
0.773
Female sex
102 (33.4)
56 (38.6)
46 (28.7)
0.089
BMI, kg/m2
28.1 (25.2 to 31.8)
27.8 (25.1-31.1)
28.7 (25.7-32.6)
0.094
MEWS
2.00 (1.0-2.0)
1.0 (0.25-2.0)
2.0 (1.0-3.0)
<0.001
Interval between symptoms onset and hospital admission (days)
7.0 (4.0-9.0)
6.0 (4.0-9.0)
7.0 (4.0-9.0)
0.324
Respiratory failure on admission
175 (57.4)
53 (36.6)
122 (76.2)
<0.001
Hypertension
168 (55.1)
75 (51.7)
93 (58.1)
0.314
Atrial fibrillation
26 (8.5)
16 (11.0)
10 (6.2)
0.197
Congestive heart failure
41 (13.4)
21 (14.5)
20 (12.5)
0.735
Coronary artery disease
50 (16.4)
22 (15.2)
28 (17.5)
0.694
Dyslipidemia
75 (24.6)
31 (21.4)
44 (27.5)
0.269
Diabetes
81 (26.6)
33 (22.8)
48 (30.0)
0.194
Asthma
30 (9.8)
15 (10.3)
15 (9.4)
0.927
COPD
16 (5.3)
10 (6.9)
6 (3.8)
0.337
History of smoking
91 (31.6)
39 (28.5)
52 (34.4)
0.336
WBC count (103/μL)
6.8 (5.1-9.8)
5.9 (4.5-7.8)
8.4 (6.0-10.7)
<0.001
D-dimer (mg/L)
0.95 (0.52-1.86)
0.90 (0.47-1.60)
0.98 (0.56-2.36)
0.027
LDH (IU/L)
363.0 (261.8-505.5)
292.0 (235.5-379.5)
430.0 (325.0-565.0)
<0.001
CRP (mg/L)
73.4 (27.1-148.5)
43.1 (11.0-94.0)
97.2 (53.1-174.5)
<0.001
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)
0.07 (0.02-0.20)
0.05 (0.02-0.13)
0.09 (0.03-0.26)
0.002
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)
32.91 (11.63-89.87)
17.8 (1.5-54.1)
47.34 (20.5-101.4)
<0.001
NT-proBNP (pg/mL)291.0 (121.5-1197.3)244.0 (86.5-994.5)384.0 (150.5-1462.8)0.005

*Abbreviations: BMI – body mass index; COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRP – C-reactive protein; LDH – lactate dehydrogenase; MEWS – modified early warning score; NT-proBNP – N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; WBC – white blood cell.

†Qualitative data are presented as n (%), while qualitative data are presented as median (IQR) unless otherwise specified.

Baseline characteristics of test-based (TB) and symptoms-based (SB) discharge group*† *Abbreviations: BMI – body mass index; COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRP – C-reactive protein; LDH – lactate dehydrogenase; MEWS – modified early warning score; NT-proBNP – N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; WBC – white blood cell. †Qualitative data are presented as n (%), while qualitative data are presented as median (IQR) unless otherwise specified.

Comparison of discharge policies

Patients in the SB group more often presented with respiratory failure, had higher MEWS on admission, higher baseline indicators of inflammation (white blood cell [WBC] count, CRP, and procalcitonin), and higher lactate dehydrogenase level, D-dimer, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The groups did not significantly differ in sex, age, BMI, and comorbidities (Table 1). Systemic steroids, remdesivir, and convalescent plasma were more commonly administered in the SB policy group, while chloroquine was more often administered in the TB group (Table 2). Patients in the SB group more often required advanced respiratory support (Figure 1). The groups had a similar mortality rate and ICU length of stay, but the TB group had significantly longer duration of hospital stay (21.0 vs 16.0, P = 0.003). A similar relationship was observed in patients with non-severe (18.5 vs 10.0, P = 0.007), severe (20.5 vs 15.0, P = 0.0498), and critical disease (31.0 vs 22.5, P = 0.041) (Figure 2).
Table 2

Treatment, respiratory support modalities, and main clinical outcomes in test-based (TB) and symptoms-based (SB) discharge group*†

Characteristics
Entire cohort
(n = 305)
TB policy
(n = 145)
SB policy
(n = 160)
P
Disease severity
non-severe
80 (26.2)
64 (44.1)
16 (10.0)
<0.001
severe
160 (52.5)
56 (38.6)
104 (65.0)

critical
65 (21.3)
25 (17.2)
40 (25.0)

Chloroquine
37 (12.1)
37 (25.5)
0 (0.0)
<0.001
Systemic steroids
158 (51.8)
25 (17.2)
133 (83.1)
<0.001
Remdesivir
83 (27.2)
0 (0.0)
83 (51.9)
<0.001
Convalescent plasma
15 (4.9)
1 (0.7)
14 (8.8)
0.003
Conventional oxygen therapy
218 (71.5)
75 (51.7)
143 (89.4)
<0.001
High-flow nasal oxygen therapy
119 (39.0)
19 (13.1)
100 (62.5)
<0.001
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation
18 (5.9)
0 (0.0)
18 (11.2)
<0.001
Invasive mechanical ventilation
52 (17.0)
14 (9.7)
38 (23.8)
0.002
Death
57 (18.7)
21 (14.5)
36 (22.5)
0.1
Duration of viral shedding (days)*
34.0 (25.0-42.0)
34.0 (25.0-42.0)
29.5 (26.5-38.0)
0.757
Length of hospitalization (days)
18.0 (12.0-28.0)
21.0 (14.0-31.0)
16.0 (11.0-26.0)
0.003
Length of intensive care unit stay (days)10.0 (7.0-16.0)10.0 (4.0-16.0)10.5 (7.0-16.3)0.348

*Data were available for 125 patients (121 patients in the TB group and 4 patients in the SB group).

†Qualitative data are presented as n (%) and qualitative data as median (interquartile range).

Figure 1

Respiratory support need stratified by the study group. HFNOT – high-flow nasal oxygen therapy; NIV – non-invasive ventilation; SB – symptom-based; TB – test-based.

Figure 2

Hospital stay length according to the disease severity. DP – discharge policy; SB – symptom-based; TB – test-based.

Treatment, respiratory support modalities, and main clinical outcomes in test-based (TB) and symptoms-based (SB) discharge group*† *Data were available for 125 patients (121 patients in the TB group and 4 patients in the SB group). †Qualitative data are presented as n (%) and qualitative data as median (interquartile range). Respiratory support need stratified by the study group. HFNOT – high-flow nasal oxygen therapy; NIV – non-invasive ventilation; SB – symptom-based; TB – test-based. Hospital stay length according to the disease severity. DP – discharge policy; SB – symptom-based; TB – test-based. In multivariable analysis, SB policy was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay (β-coefficient -5.87, 95% CI -9.78 to -1.96, P = 0.003). Older age was associated with longer hospital stay (β-coefficient 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.24, P = 0.012). Duration of hospital stay was not associated with respiratory failure, obesity, hypertension, baseline MEWS, and steroid administration.

Factors associated with time to viral clearance

Among 125 patients with available data on the duration of viral shedding, the median time from symptoms onset to achieving two consecutive negative RT-PCR tests was 34.0 days (IQR 25.0 to 42.0; ranged 7.0-87.0 days). Of these patients, 61 patients (48.8%) were non-severely ill, 44 patients (35.2%) were severely ill, and 20 patients (16.0%) were critically ill. Age significantly yet weakly correlated with viral shedding duration (Figure 3). Among survivors from the TB group, the proportion of patients discharged with a positive RT-PCR was 46.8% (58/124) in the entire study group, 59.4% (38/64) among patients with non-severe disease, 36.4% (16/44) among patients with severe disease, and 25% (4/16) among patients with critical disease. A multivariable analysis revealed that longer viral clearance was associated with older age (β-coefficient 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51, P < 0.001) and history of cough in the pre-hospital phase of the disease (5.96, 95% CI 0.64 to 11.29, P = 0.028). Viral clearance duration was not significantly associated with BMI, acute respiratory failure, diabetes, hypertension, presence of lesions in the chest x-ray, and baseline CRP concentration.
Figure 3

The correlation between age and duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding (Spearman R).

The correlation between age and duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding (Spearman R).

DISCUSSION

In this cross-sectional study enrolling more than 300 patients hospitalized because of COVID-19, TB discharge policy was associated with longer hospital stay compared with SB policy regardless of disease severity. Age and history of cough in the pre-hospital phase of the disease were independently associated with the duration of viral clearance. The approach to isolation discontinuation has evolved with the increase in knowledge about the infectivity of COVID-19 patients. Initially, major health care organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization, recommended the TB approach (10,11). Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA does not necessarily imply the presence of an infectious and active virus, and the infectivity is highest within five to six days from symptoms onset (12). Furthermore, in immunocompetent patients the risk of disease transmission after nine days from symptoms onset was very low (13-15). Accumulating evidence led to a recommendation that isolation is discontinued based on SB criteria, which were also introduced in Poland (16). Intuitively, the latter approach has the advantage of improving the patient flow in overloaded wards, and of reducing the number of tests and medical care costs. On the other hand, in some patient groups, particularly among immunocompromised individuals, the replication-competent virus can be detected even beyond 20 days after the symptoms onset (17). Viral clearance should be confirmed, eg, in patients discharged to long-term care or rehabilitation facilities or in those who cohabitate with immunocompromised individuals. Unfortunately, only a few reports have assessed the relation between discharge policy and patient-centered outcomes in the context of patients` characteristics and COVID-19 severity. Patients in the SB group spent a median of six days fewer in the hospital than those in the TB group. However, the analysis of hospital stay length is susceptible to confounding variables including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, disease severity, and treatment. In the current study, the groups were balanced in terms of sex, age, and major comorbidities. However, patients in the SB group were more severely ill, which was indicated by a higher incidence of respiratory failure and increased need for advanced respiratory support. One would expect such patients to require more time to recuperate and to be discharged from hospital (2,18). On the other hand, administration of steroids and remdesivir and greater experience of the medical personnel and greater vigilance in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and diagnosis had a potentially opposite effect on hospital stay length in the SB policy group (5,19,20). To account for the mentioned imbalances, we performed a multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with an increased length of hospital stay. After adjustment for potential confounders, including demographic characteristics, selected comorbidities, MEWS on admission, presence of respiratory failure, and steroid administration, we confirmed that SB discharge policy was independently associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay, while older age was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay. Previous studies suggested that factors associated with the length of hospital stay were age >60 years, diabetes, fever, neutrophil and lymphocyte count, hypocalcemia, hypochloremia, increased CRP and D-dimer concentrations, bilateral pneumonia, and steroids administration. However, these studies were limited by small study samples and retrospective design (21-24). In our opinion, the presented results confirm the superiority of SB discharge policy over TB discharge policy, which is reflected in a shorter hospital stay without significant difference in in-hospital mortality. After the initial hospital admission, some convalescents require further diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Many non-COVID wards performing these procedures require a negative RT-PCR test from electively admitted patients. In this context, we identified factors associated with the duration of viral clearance. Multivariable analysis revealed that older age and history of cough before admission were associated with longer viral clearance. Surprisingly, radiographic changes on the chest x-ray and acute respiratory failure in the course of COVID-19 were not associated with longer viral clearance. These results suggest that elderly patients are at increased risk of prolonged viral shedding. Age was also associated with a longer viral shedding in a meta-analysis assessing SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics that included 79 studies with 5340 participants (16). Unfortunately, most studies included in this meta-analysis were case series, with only two cross-sectional studies, one prospective study, and one randomized controlled trial (25-28). Interestingly, in 11 analyzed studies no live virus was isolated from respiratory samples beyond day 9 (16). These findings should be taken into account by policymakers who regulate post-COVID admissions of convalescents. A law properly regulating this aspect could improve the quality of care for COVID-19 convalescents. This study has several limitations. Due to a relatively small study sample, the number of variables included in both models was limited, which increased the risk of omitting an important confounder. Second, due to changes in discharge policy, the information about viral clearance was restricted to patients hospitalized when TB policy was in effect. Third, according to the local policy, following a positive control RT-PCR, testing was repeated after seven days, which probably led to an overestimation of the duration of viral shedding and hospital stay. Our results reflect actual strategies applied in the early phases of the pandemic and provide real-life information about their effect on hospital stay duration and the capacity of health care system. Fourth, a lack of follow-up clinical data hinders our ability to analyze the association between discharge policy and patients` outcomes in a longer term. Finally, our single-center experience limits the generalizability of the presented results. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that a discharge policy based on symptoms rather than on tests is associated with shorter hospital stay and should be preferred during the current pandemic. Moreover, a significant association between prolonged viral clearance and older age in patients with COVID-19 should be taken into account by policymakers regulating health care provision for convalescents.
  25 in total

1.  Clinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo'.

Authors:  Enrico Lavezzo; Elisa Franchin; Constanze Ciavarella; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Luisa Barzon; Claudia Del Vecchio; Lucia Rossi; Riccardo Manganelli; Arianna Loregian; Nicolò Navarin; Davide Abate; Manuela Sciro; Stefano Merigliano; Ettore De Canale; Maria Cristina Vanuzzo; Valeria Besutti; Francesca Saluzzo; Francesco Onelia; Monia Pacenti; Saverio G Parisi; Giovanni Carretta; Daniele Donato; Luciano Flor; Silvia Cocchio; Giulia Masi; Alessandro Sperduti; Lorenzo Cattarino; Renato Salvador; Michele Nicoletti; Federico Caldart; Gioele Castelli; Eleonora Nieddu; Beatrice Labella; Ludovico Fava; Matteo Drigo; Katy A M Gaythorpe; Alessandra R Brazzale; Stefano Toppo; Marta Trevisan; Vincenzo Baldo; Christl A Donnelly; Neil M Ferguson; Ilaria Dorigatti; Andrea Crisanti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Antonio Pesenti; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Triple combination of interferon beta-1b, lopinavir-ritonavir, and ribavirin in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Ivan Fan-Ngai Hung; Kwok-Cheung Lung; Eugene Yuk-Keung Tso; Raymond Liu; Tom Wai-Hin Chung; Man-Yee Chu; Yuk-Yung Ng; Jenny Lo; Jacky Chan; Anthony Raymond Tam; Hoi-Ping Shum; Veronica Chan; Alan Ka-Lun Wu; Kit-Man Sin; Wai-Shing Leung; Wai-Lam Law; David Christopher Lung; Simon Sin; Pauline Yeung; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Ricky Ruiqi Zhang; Agnes Yim-Fong Fung; Erica Yuen-Wing Yan; Kit-Hang Leung; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Allen Wing-Ho Chu; Wan-Mui Chan; Anthony Chin-Ki Ng; Rodney Lee; Kitty Fung; Alwin Yeung; Tak-Chiu Wu; Johnny Wai-Man Chan; Wing-Wah Yan; Wai-Ming Chan; Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Albert Kwok-Wai Lie; Owen Tak-Yin Tsang; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Tak-Lun Que; Chak-Sing Lau; Kwok-Hung Chan; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report.

Authors:  John H Beigel; Kay M Tomashek; Lori E Dodd; Aneesh K Mehta; Barry S Zingman; Andre C Kalil; Elizabeth Hohmann; Helen Y Chu; Annie Luetkemeyer; Susan Kline; Diego Lopez de Castilla; Robert W Finberg; Kerry Dierberg; Victor Tapson; Lanny Hsieh; Thomas F Patterson; Roger Paredes; Daniel A Sweeney; William R Short; Giota Touloumi; David Chien Lye; Norio Ohmagari; Myoung-Don Oh; Guillermo M Ruiz-Palacios; Thomas Benfield; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Mark G Kortepeter; Robert L Atmar; C Buddy Creech; Jens Lundgren; Abdel G Babiker; Sarah Pett; James D Neaton; Timothy H Burgess; Tyler Bonnett; Michelle Green; Mat Makowski; Anu Osinusi; Seema Nayak; H Clifford Lane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Anthony C Gordon; Paul R Mouncey; Farah Al-Beidh; Kathryn M Rowan; Alistair D Nichol; Yaseen M Arabi; Djillali Annane; Abi Beane; Wilma van Bentum-Puijk; Lindsay R Berry; Zahra Bhimani; Marc J M Bonten; Charlotte A Bradbury; Frank M Brunkhorst; Adrian Buzgau; Allen C Cheng; Michelle A Detry; Eamon J Duffy; Lise J Estcourt; Mark Fitzgerald; Herman Goossens; Rashan Haniffa; Alisa M Higgins; Thomas E Hills; Christopher M Horvat; Francois Lamontagne; Patrick R Lawler; Helen L Leavis; Kelsey M Linstrum; Edward Litton; Elizabeth Lorenzi; John C Marshall; Florian B Mayr; Daniel F McAuley; Anna McGlothlin; Shay P McGuinness; Bryan J McVerry; Stephanie K Montgomery; Susan C Morpeth; Srinivas Murthy; Katrina Orr; Rachael L Parke; Jane C Parker; Asad E Patanwala; Ville Pettilä; Emma Rademaker; Marlene S Santos; Christina T Saunders; Christopher W Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Wendy I Sligl; Alexis F Turgeon; Anne M Turner; Frank L van de Veerdonk; Ryan Zarychanski; Cameron Green; Roger J Lewis; Derek C Angus; Colin J McArthur; Scott Berry; Steve A Webb; Lennie P G Derde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Piscoya; Luis F Ng-Sueng; Angela Parra Del Riego; Renato Cerna-Viacava; Vinay Pasupuleti; Yuani M Roman; Priyaleela Thota; C Michael White; Adrian V Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to an intensive care unit in London: A prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ross J Thomson; Jennifer Hunter; Jonathan Dutton; James Schneider; Maryam Khosravi; Alisha Casement; Kulwant Dhadwal; Daniel Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Risk factors associated with disease severity and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Xiaofan Liu; Hong Zhou; Yilu Zhou; Xiaojun Wu; Yang Zhao; Yang Lu; Weijun Tan; Mingli Yuan; Xuhong Ding; Jinjing Zou; Ruiyun Li; Hailing Liu; Rob M Ewing; Yi Hu; Hanxiang Nie; Yihua Wang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.072

10.  Understanding factors influencing the length of hospital stay among non-severe COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study in a Fangcang shelter hospital.

Authors:  Shishi Wu; Lanping Xue; Helena Legido-Quigley; Mishal Khan; Hua Wu; Xiaoxiang Peng; Xuewen Li; Ping Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.