| Literature DB >> 35229058 |
Michael J Bennett1,2, Matthew I Balcerek3, Edward Ad Lewis4, Roland Ll Zhang5, Caroline Bachmeier6, Siok Tey7, Steven Faux4, Laila Girgis8, Jerry R Greenfield1, Syndia Lazarus3,9.
Abstract
Voriconazole-associated periostitis (VAP) is an underrecognized and unpredictable side effect of long-term voriconazole therapy. We report two cases of VAP occurring in the post-transplant setting: a 68-year-old lung transplant recipient who required ongoing voriconazole therapy, in whom urinary alkalinization was used to promote fluoride excretion and minimize voriconazole-related skeletal toxicity, and a 68-year-old stem-cell transplant recipient with a high voriconazole dose requirement, identified on pharmacogenomic testing to be a CYP2C19 ultrarapid metabolizer, the dominant enzyme in voriconazole metabolism. This is the first reported case of pharmacogenomic profiling in VAP and may explain the variability in individual susceptibility to this uncommon adverse effect. Our findings provide new insights into both the management and underlying pathophysiology of VAP.Entities:
Keywords: MATRIX MINERALIZATION (BONE MATRIX); OTHER (DISEASES AND DISORDERS OF/RELATED TO BONE); PHARMACOGENOMICS (GENETIC RESEARCH)
Year: 2021 PMID: 35229058 PMCID: PMC8861987 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBMR Plus ISSN: 2473-4039
Initial (Time of Presentation With Bone Pain) and Subsequent Investigations Performed for Patients 1 and 2
| Parameter | Patient 1 | Reference range | Patient 2 | Reference range | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | 1 month | 2 months | Initial | 2 months | |||
| Biochemistry | |||||||
| Creatinine | 72 | 74 | 67 | 45–90 μmol/L | 139 | 108 | 64–108 μmol/L |
| eGFR | 74 | 72 | 81 | >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 44 | 60 | >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 |
| Corrected calcium | 2.30 | 2.41 | 2.45 | 2.10–2.60 mmol/L | 2.37 | 2.31 | 2.10–2.60 mmol/L |
| Phosphate | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.70–1.50 mmol/L | 1.50 | 1.13 | 0.75–1.50 mmol/L |
| PTH | 25.6 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 2.0–9.0 pmol/L | 3.1 | – | 1.6–6.9 pmol/L |
| 25(OH)D | 65 | – | – | 50–150 nmol/L | 66 | – | 50–150 nmol/L |
| 1,25(OH)2D | 93 | – | – | 60–200 pmol/L | – | – | 60–200 pmol/L |
| Albumin | 28 | – | – | 33–48 g/L | 37 | 31 | 35–50 g/L |
| ALP | 107 | 254 | 208 | 30–110 U/L | 217 | 99 | 30–110 U/L |
| CTX | 307 | – | – | 50–800 ng/L | 1480 | 900 | 50–800 ng/L |
| P1NP | 104 | – | – | 8–84 ug/L | 132 | 48 | 8–84 ug/L |
| FGF‐23 | 189.0 | – | – | 23.3–95.4 ng/L | – | – | – |
| Voriconazole concentration | 6.2 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 3.0–4.0 mg/L | 2.4 | – | 3.0–4.0 mg/L |
| 24‐hour urine analysis | |||||||
| Urinary calcium excretion | 0.6 | – | – | 2.5–8.0 mmol/d | – | – | NA |
| Urinary phosphate excretion | 30.2 | – | – | mmol/d | – | – | NA |
| Tmp/GFR | 0.12 | – | – | 0.80–1.35 mmol/L | – | – | NA |
| Urine metabolic screen | Negative | – | – | NA | – | – | NA |
| Urine glucose concentration | 0 | – | – | 0 mmol/L | – | – | NA |
| Medications | |||||||
| Voriconazole dose | 1200 | 900 | 850 | mg/d | 800 | 0 | mg/d |
| Calcium dose | 0 | 500 | 500 | mg/d | 600 | 600 | mg/d |
| Phosphate dose | 1000 | Nil | 0 | mg/d | 0 | 0 | mg/d |
| Calcitriol dose | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | mcg/d | 0 | 0 | mcg/d |
| Performance status | |||||||
| Mobility | Full assist | Standby assist 4WW | Independent 4WW | NA | 4WW and wheelchair | Independent | NA |
| Body weight | 58.7 | 61.0 | 62.5 | Kg | 66.7 | 69.4 | Kg |
eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; PTH = parathyroid hormone; 1,25(OH)D = 25‐hydroxyvitamin D; 1,25(OH)2D = 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D; ALP = alkaline phosphatase; GGT = gamma‐glutamyl transferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; CTX = C‐terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen; P1NP = procollagen type 1 N propeptide; FGF‐23 = fibroblast growth factor‐23; TmP/GFR = renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate; conc = concentration; 4WW = four‐wheeled walker; NA = not applicable.
No reference range for urinary phosphate excretion is listed as interpretation is relative to other parameters.
Fig. 1Radiological changes evident 21 months post‐transplant (patient 1). Areas of thick periosteal reaction (arrows) were evident on the middle and proximal phalanges and second metacarpal of the right hand (left image) and right proximal radial shaft (right image).
Fig. 2Serial technetium‐labeled bone scintigraphy (patient 1) performed in the months after onset of skeletal pain. Images show the emergence and progression of multiple areas of abnormal tracer uptake affecting the vertebrae (thoracic and lumbar), bilateral shoulders, elbows, pelvis, femora, tibias, hands, knees, and mid‐foot joints. In a number of regions, increased uptake corresponded to areas of periosteal new bone formation.
Fig. 3Plasma fluoride concentration and voriconazole dose versus time from commencement of urinary alkalinization for patient 1. Pretreatment plasma fluoride concentration is unknown (represented by the gray dotted line).
Fig. 4Serum voriconazole concentration from time of commencement of voriconazole for patient 2. Serum voriconazole levels were persistently subtherapeutic and pain onset occurred 6 weeks after dose escalation.
Fig. 5Proposed pathophysiological model incorporating case‐specific factors.