Literature DB >> 35228946

A Giant Internal Carotid Bifurcation Aneurysm as a Rare and Dangerous Differential Diagnosis of a Craniopharyngioma.

Caio M Perret1,2, Raphael Bertani3, Stefan W Koester4, Paulo Eduardo Santa Maria3, Daniela Von Zuben3, Sávio Batista5, Hugo C Schiavini3, José Alberto Landeiro6.   

Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas are supra/parasellar lesions that often present with general, unspecific symptoms. Similarly, internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation giant aneurysms may also produce calcified, heterogeneous, parasellar expansive lesions, posing a relevant differential diagnosis due to their inherently different surgical strategies and risks. We report the case of a 54-year-old female presenting with progressive disorientation and apathetic behavior. CT and MRI reports described a suprasellar heterogenous mass with calcifications associated with an adjacent, laterally located fluid collection suggestive of a craniopharyngioma. During the surgical procedure, perfuse and unexplained arterial bleeding ensued, prompting the surgical team to review a previous contrast-enhanced CT scan. Careful inspection revealed an image suggestive of vascular pathology, with an area of continuous hyperdensity along the right ICA bifurcation. The Sylvian fissure was dissected, and an aneurysmal neck was encountered and successfully clipped. Giant intracranial aneurysms are rare but essential differential diagnoses to be considered during the workup and surgical approach toward parasellar mass lesions. This case illustrates the importance of performing a CT angiogram (CTA) for skull base lesions, even when the size is more suggestive of tumor pathology.
Copyright © 2022, Perret et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carotid bifurcation aneurysm; craniopharyngioma; giant aneurysm; giant carotid aneurysm; imaging

Year:  2022        PMID: 35228946      PMCID: PMC8867713          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  9 in total

1.  [Hormonal dysfunction of nonpituitary lesions from midline and perisellar area].

Authors:  A L Fonseca; A A Souto; F Domingues; M Vaisman; M R Gadelha; L Chimelli; M J Santos; A H Violante
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.420

Review 2.  Craniopharyngioma surgery.

Authors:  Jürgen Honegger; Marcos Tatagiba
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Surgical strategies for giant intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  M T Lawton; R F Spetzler
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  1999

4.  Giant basilar bifurcation aneurysm presenting as a third ventricular mass with unilateral obstructive hydrocephalus: case report.

Authors:  K Hongo; N Morota; T Watabe; M Isobe; H Nakagawa
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Craniopharyngiomas: a clinical and pathological review.

Authors:  C K Petito; U DeGirolami; K M Earle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Giant intracranial aneurysms: development, clinical presentation and treatment.

Authors:  In Sup Choi; Carlos David
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Giant posterior communicating artery aneurysm presenting as third ventricle mass with obstructive hydrocephalus. Case report.

Authors:  K A Smith; G E Kraus; B A Johnson; R F Spetzler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  The sellar and suprasellar region: A "hideaway" of rare lesions. Clinical aspects, imaging findings, surgical outcome and comparative analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Petrakakis; Ariyan Pirayesh; Joachim K Krauss; Peter Raab; Christian Hartmann; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Craniopharyngiomas : Radiological Differentiation of Two Types.

Authors:  In Ho Lee; Elcin Zan; W Robert Bell; Peter C Burger; Heejong Sung; David M Yousem
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.