| Literature DB >> 35228781 |
Saeed Sani1, Hossein Ebrahimzadeh Shermeh2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Widely spread of the COVID-19 virus has put the whole world in jeopardy. At this moment, using new techniques to detect and treat this novel disease is of significance or maybe the first priority of many scientists and researchers throughout the world.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus disease 2019; Hopfield neural network; Image processing; Machine learning; Operation research
Year: 2022 PMID: 35228781 PMCID: PMC8867982 DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Syst Appl ISSN: 0957-4174 Impact factor: 6.954
Comparison between proposed methods for detecting COVID-19 using chest images.
| Article | Dataset | No. of training data | No. of test data | Classification method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest X-ray images | 137 | 59 | A deep Learning model | |
| Chest CT scans | 528 | 90 | A deep Learning model | |
| Chest X-ray images | 2600 | 60 | Different deep learning techniques | |
| Chest CT scans | 4 | 51 | stack hybrid classification system (SHC) | |
| Chest CT scans | 270 | 157 | A deep learning algorithm | |
| Chest CT scans | 2969 | 353 | A deep learning model | |
| Chest CT scans | 425 | 199 | A deep Transfer Learning model | |
| Chest CT scans | 453 | 217 | A deep learning algorithm | |
| Chest X-ray images | 70 | 1531 | A deep learning model | |
| Chest CT scans | 499 | 131 | weakly-supervised deep learning-based algorithm |
Fig. 1COVID-19 symptoms types in Chest CT: ground glass opacity (left), the crazy paving sign (middle), and consolidation (right).
Fig. 2Using the operational research model to mask a lung. Outer edge of the lung (left), lower edge of the lung (middle), and the masked lung (right).
Fig. 3Transforming a decimal element from a matrix to two elements belonging to using presented function.
Fig. 4Flow chart of the presented algorithm for detection of COVID-19 using chest CT images.
Comparing the output of the model using CT scans with the clinical diagnosis results.
| Dataset | Class | Sensitivity % | Specificity % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st dataset | Covid-19 | 95.4 (41 of 43) | 98.7 (77 of 78) |
| CAP | 96.8 (60 of 62) | 98.3 (58 of 59) | |
| Non-pneumonia | 100 (16 of 16) | 98.1 (103 of 105) | |
| 2nd dataset | Covid-19 | 98.3 (59 of 60) | 97.8 (44 of 45) |
| CAP | 96.9 (31 of 32) | 100 (73 of 73) | |
| Non-pneumonia | 100 (13 of 13) | 98.9 (91 of 92) | |
| 3rd dataset | Covid-19 | 98 (49 of 50) | 100 (19 of 19) |
| CAP | 100 (15 of 15) | 100 (54 of 54) | |
| Non-pneumonia | 100 (4 of 4) | 98.5 (64 of 65) | |
| All | Covid-19 | 97.4 (149 of 153) | 98.6 (140 of 142) |
| CAP | 97.3 (106 of 109) | 99.5 (185 of 186) | |
| Non-pneumonia | 100 (33 of 33) | 98.5 (258 of 262) |
Fig. 5Diagnosed areas infected by Coronavirus in a CT image using proposed algorithm.
Friedman test results.
| N | 295 |
| Chi-Square | 1.6667 |
| df | 5 |
| Asymp. Sig. | 0.893 |
Mean ranks of the method using different training sets.
| Method (Classifier trained by set:) | Mean rank |
|---|---|
| A | 3.51 |
| B | 3.49 |
| C | 3.51 |
| D | 3.48 |
| E | 3.51 |
| F | 3.51 |