Literature DB >> 35228769

A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing.

Rahul Davis1,2, Abhishek Singh1, Mark James Jackson3, Reginaldo Teixeira Coelho4, Divya Prakash2, Charalambos Panayiotou Charalambous5,6, Waqar Ahmed7, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da Silva8, Abner Ankit Lawrence2.   

Abstract

There is a tremendous increase in the demand for converting biomaterials into high-quality industrially manufactured human body parts, also known as medical implants. Drug delivery systems, bone plates, screws, cranial, and dental devices are the popular examples of these implants - the potential alternatives for human life survival. However, the processing techniques of an engineered implant largely determine its preciseness, surface characteristics, and interactive ability with the adjacent tissue(s) in a particular biological environment. Moreover, the high cost-effective manufacturing of an implant under tight tolerances remains a challenge. In this regard, several subtractive or additive manufacturing techniques are employed to manufacture patient-specific implants, depending primarily on the required biocompatibility, bioactivity, surface integrity, and fatigue strength. The present paper reviews numerous non-degradable and degradable metallic implant biomaterials such as stainless steel (SS), titanium (Ti)-based, cobalt (Co)-based, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and magnesium (Mg)-based alloys, followed by their processing via traditional turning, drilling, and milling including the high-speed multi-axis CNC machining, and non-traditional  abrasive water jet machining (AWJM), laser beam machining (LBM), ultrasonic machining (USM), and electric discharge machining (EDM) types of subtractive manufacturing techniques. However, the review further funnels down its primary focus on Mg, NiTi, and Ti-based alloys on the basis of the increasing trend of their implant applications in the last decade due to some of their outstanding properties. In the recent years, the incorporation of cryogenic coolant-assisted traditional subtraction of biomaterials has gained researchers' attention due to its sustainability, environment-friendly nature, performance, and superior biocompatible and functional outcomes fitting for medical applications. However, some of the latest studies reported that the medical implant manufacturing requirements could be more remarkably met using the non-traditional subtractive manufacturing approaches. Altogether, cryogenic  machining among the traditional routes and EDM among the non-traditional means along with their variants, were identified as some of the most effective subtractive manufacturing techniques for achieving the dimensionally accurate and biocompatible metallic medical implants with significantly modified surfaces.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Cryogenic Machining; Electric discharge machining; Metallic implant biomaterials; Subtractive manufacturing; Traditional and non-traditional machining

Year:  2022        PMID: 35228769      PMCID: PMC8865884          DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adv Manuf Technol        ISSN: 0268-3768            Impact factor:   3.563


  52 in total

1.  Bone bonding bioactivity of Ti metal and Ti-Zr-Nb-Ta alloys with Ca ions incorporated on their surfaces by simple chemical and heat treatments.

Authors:  A Fukuda; M Takemoto; T Saito; S Fujibayashi; M Neo; S Yamaguchi; T Kizuki; T Matsushita; M Niinomi; T Kokubo; T Nakamura
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Effect of electrical discharging on formation of nanoporous biocompatible layer on Ti-6Al-4V alloys.

Authors:  Tzu-Sen Yang; Mao-Suan Huang; Mao-Sheng Wang; Ming-Hong Lin; Meng-Yuan Tsai; Pei-Yi Wang Wang
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 3.  Biological responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial surface.

Authors:  Maryam Rahmati; Eduardo A Silva; Janne E Reseland; Catherine A Heyward; Håvard J Haugen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Bulk Metallic Glasses for Implantable Medical Devices and Surgical Tools.

Authors:  Philip Meagher; Eoin D O'Cearbhaill; James H Byrne; David J Browne
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Nickel-free austenitic stainless steels for medical applications.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Yibin Ren
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 8.090

6.  Effect of surface deformation on biocompatibility of biomedical alloys.

Authors:  Zhizhong She; Yan Nie; Hui Zhong; Lihong Liu; Shu Yu; Yunping Li
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 7.  Bio-Functional Design, Application and Trends in Metallic Biomaterials.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Changchun Zhou; Hongsong Fan; Yujiang Fan; Qing Jiang; Ping Song; Hongyuan Fan; Yu Chen; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Impact of surface topography and coating on osteogenesis and bacterial attachment on titanium implants.

Authors:  Laila Damiati; Marcus G Eales; Angela H Nobbs; Bo Su; Penelope M Tsimbouri; Manuel Salmeron-Sanchez; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 7.813

9.  Fundamental Investigation into Tool Wear and Surface Quality in High-Speed Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy.

Authors:  Adel T Abbas; Essam A Al Bahkali; Saeed M Alqahtani; Elshaimaa Abdelnasser; Noha Naeim; Ahmed Elkaseer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Risk factors for refracture after plate removal for midshaft clavicle fracture after bone union.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Tsai; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Fang-Wei Hsu; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Kun-Hui Chen; Chao-Ching Chiang; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  3 in total

1.  Decellularized Wharton Jelly Implants Do Not Trigger Collagen and Cartilaginous Tissue Production in Tracheal Injury in Rabbits.

Authors:  Katia Martins Foltz; Aloysio Enck Neto; Júlio César Francisco; Rossana Baggio Simeoni; Anna Flávia Ribeiro Dos Santos Miggiolaro; Thatyanne Gradowski do Nascimento; Bassam Felipe Mogharbel; Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Lúcia de Noronha; Luiz César Guarita-Souza
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 2.  Bio-high entropy alloys: Progress, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Junyi Feng; Yujin Tang; Jia Liu; Peilei Zhang; Changxi Liu; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-08

3.  Microstructure and Electrochemical Characterization of Ti-Sn Binary Alloys for Dental Applications.

Authors:  Moon-Jin Hwang; Ho-Jun Song; Yeong-Joon Park
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.748

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.