Literature DB >> 35228152

Submaximal contractions can serve as a reliable technique for shoulder electromyography normalization.

Jennifer Cooper1, Andrew Karduna2.   

Abstract

There are a number of ways to normalize electromyographical data, the most common of which is using a maximal contraction as a reference. However, this technique is not always practical. The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability of an electromyographical data normalization technique using standardized submaximal contractions. Twenty healthy subjects (ten male, ten female) were used for testing, which was performed using both surface and fine-wire electromyography over two sessions at 15, 30, 45, and 60 percent of the day 1 maximum force. There was a mean of 5.3 days between test days. Data were compared between days, and the resulting ICC and standard error of the measurement values indicate varying levels of reliability at each submaximal percent. All heads of the deltoid, the upper trapezius and the serratus anterior demonstrated good reliability for at least one submaximal condition. The latissimus dorsi and supraspinatus demonstrated moderate reliability for at least one submaximal condition. Finally, the infraspinatus demonstrated poor reliability under all conditions. For situations in which MVC is impractical or anticipated to change, EMG amplitude normalization to one of these submaximal percentages appears to be a viable technique, at least for most muscles.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; Kinematics; Normalization; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35228152      PMCID: PMC8976741          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  17 in total

1.  Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients.

Authors:  Wim Dankaerts; Peter Bruce O'Sullivan; Angus Firth Burnett; Leon Melville Straker; Lieven Andre Danneels
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  EMG signal amplitude normalization technique in stretch-shortening cycle movements.

Authors:  G T Allison; R N Marshall; K P Singer
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Reliability of normalisation methods for EMG analysis of neck muscles.

Authors:  Kevin J Netto; Angus F Burnett
Journal:  Work       Date:  2006

4.  Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG.

Authors:  Craig E Boettcher; Karen A Ginn; Ian Cathers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Reliability and interpretation of single leg stance and maximum voluntary isometric contraction methods of electromyography normalization.

Authors:  Marc F Norcross; J Troy Blackburn; Benjamin M Goerger
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  EMG signal amplitude assessment during abdominal bracing and hollowing.

Authors:  G T Allison; P Godfrey; G Robinson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

8.  Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions.

Authors:  J F Yang; D A Winter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis.

Authors:  J F Yang; D A Winter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  The strength of the rotator cuff before and after subacromial injection of lidocaine.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Woo-Seung Lee; Sung Tae Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.