| Literature DB >> 35225691 |
Emma Mills1, Erin Sullivan1, Jasna Kovac1.
Abstract
Bacillus cereus group isolates (n = 85) were screened for phenotypic resistance to 18 antibiotics using broth microdilution and CLSI M45 Bacillus spp. breakpoints. The susceptibility to 9 out of 18 antibiotics was also tested using disk diffusion method and M100 Staphylococcus spp. breakpoints when available. Overall, a high prevalence of susceptibility to clinically relevant antibiotics was identified using broth microdilution. For most tested antibiotics, a poor correlation was found between zones of inhibition and MICs. Using the broth microdilution results as a reference for comparison, we identified high error rates and low categorical agreement between results produced using disk diffusion and broth microdilution for the seven tested antibiotics with defined breakpoints. This suggests that disk diffusion should be avoided for AST of B. cereus group isolates. Further, we detected antimicrobial resistance genes with ARIBA and ABRIcate to calculate the sensitivity and specificity for predicting phenotypic resistance determined using broth microdilution based on the presence of detected antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). ARGs with poor sensitivity and high specificity included rph (rifampicin, 0%, 93%), mph (erythromycin, 0%, 99%), bla1 (penicillin, 29%, 100%), and blaZ (penicillin, 56%, 100%). Compared to penicillin, bla1 and blaZ had lower specificity for the prediction of ampicillin resistance. Overall, none of the ARGs had both high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting the need for further study of the mechanisms underlying phenotypic antimicrobial resistance in the B. cereus group. IMPORTANCE Bacillus cereus group includes human pathogens that can cause severe infections requiring antibiotic treatment. Screening of environmental and food isolates for antimicrobial resistance can provide insight into what antibiotics may be more effective therapeutic options based on the lower prevalence of resistance. Currently, the comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results using the disk diffusion method is complicated by the fact that many previous studies have used Staphylococcus spp. breakpoints to interpret their results. In this study, we compared the results of disk diffusion interpreted using the Staphylococcus spp. breakpoints against the results of broth microdilution interpreted using Bacillus spp. breakpoints. We demonstrated that the disk diffusion method does not produce reliable results for B. cereus group isolates and should therefore be avoided. This study also provides new insight into poor associations between the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes and resistance phenotypes for the B. cereus group.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus cereus group; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial resistance genes; broth microdilution; disk diffusion; sensitivity; specificity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35225691 PMCID: PMC8939351 DOI: 10.1128/aem.02302-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
FIG 1Scatterplots showing the analysis of zones of inhibition produced by disk diffusion method (Y axis) and MICs produced by broth microdilution method (X axis) for antibiotics (A) ampicillin, (B) ceftriaxone, (C) ciprofloxacin, (D) erythromycin, (E) gentamicin, (F) rifampicin, (G) tetracycline, (H) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and (I) vancomycin. R2 values for each antibiotic tested are shown below an antibiotic name.
Error rates and categorical agreement for antimicrobial susceptibility testing results of B. cereus group isolates obtained using disk diffusion and broth microdilution (reference) methods
| Percent (count) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotic | Minor | Major | Very | Categorical | Total |
| Ampicillin | 0 | 0 | 35 (30) | 65 (55) | 85 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 19 (16) | 1 (1) | 2 (2) | 78 (66) | 85 |
| Erythromycin | 26 (22) | 0 | 0 | 74 (63) | 85 |
| Gentamicin | 4 (3) | 0 | 8 (7) | 88 (75) | 85 |
| Rifampicin | 24 (20) | 34 (29) | 4 (3) | 39 (33) | 85 |
| Tetracycline | 35 (30) | 11 (9) | 0 | 54 (46) | 85 |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 7 (6) | 0 | 15 (13) | 78 (66) | 85 |
Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among 85 tested B. cereus group isolates
| Antibiotic | Interpretation breakpoints | Percentage (count) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | I | S | ||
| Linezolid | EUCAST v12.0 | 2 (2) | 0 | 98 (83) |
| Ampicillin | M45 CLSI | 98 (83) | 0 | 2 (2) |
| Ciprofloxacin | M45 CLSI | 0 | 2 (2) | 98 (83) |
| Clindamycin | M45 CLSI | 0 | 39 (33) | 61 (52) |
| Erythromycin | M45 CLSI | 0 | 20 (17) | 80 (68) |
| Gentamicin | M45 CLSI | 8 (7) | 4 (3) | 88 (75) |
| Levofloxacin | M45 CLSI | 0 | 0 | 100 (85) |
| Penicillin | M45 CLSI | 100 (85) | 0 | 0 |
| Rifampicin | M45 CLSI | 8 (7) | 2 (2) | 89 (76) |
| Tetracycline | M45 CLSI | 4 (3) | 0 | 96 (82) |
| Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole | M45 CLSI | 100 (85) | 0 | 0 |
| Vancomycin | M45 CLSI | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 98 (83) |
R, resistant.
I, intermediate.
S, susceptible.
FIG 2Phylogenetic tree for 85 B. cereus group isolates, annotated with the panC phylogenetic grouping (panC), MLST sequence type (ST), phenotypic resistance to ampicillin (AMP), penicillin (PEN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX), clindamycin (CLI), erythromycin (ERY), gentamicin (GEN), linezolid (LZD), tetracycline (TET), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), and vancomycin (VAN). Phenotypic resistance was tested using the broth microdilution assay and interpreted using CLSI M45 Bacillus spp. breakpoints, except for linezolid for which EUCAST v12.0 Bacillus spp. breakpoints were used. The genes listed next to each antibiotic have previously been linked with phenotypic resistance to these antibiotics.
Sensitivity and specificity of antimicrobial resistance genes to predict phenotypic resistance
| Antibiotic | AGR | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin |
| 28.92 | 50.00 |
|
| 56.63 | 50.00 | |
| Penicillin |
| 29.41 | 100.00 |
|
| 56.47 | 100.00 | |
| Erythromycin |
| 0.00 | 98.52 |
| Rifampicin |
| 0.00 | 93.42 |
ARG, antimicrobial resistance gene.
Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the broth microdilution results interpreted with CLSI M45 Bacillus spp. breakpoints. Only susceptible and resistant isolates, but not intermediate isolates, were included in the calculation.