Literature DB >> 35225011

Using a Passive Back Exoskeleton During a Simulated Sorting Task: Influence on Muscle Activity, Posture, and Heart Rate.

Mona Bär, Tessy Luger1, Robert Seibt, Monika A Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate using a back exoskeleton in a simulated sorting task in a static forward bent trunk posture on muscle activity, posture, and heart rate (HR).
BACKGROUND: Potentials of exoskeletons for reducing musculoskeletal demands in work tasks need to be clarified.
METHODS: Thirty-six healthy males performed the sorting task in 40°-forward bent static trunk posture for 90 seconds, in three trunk orientations, with and without exoskeleton. Muscle activity of the erector spinae (ES), biceps femoris (BF), trapezius descendens (TD), rectus abdominis (RA), vastus laterals (VL), and gastrocnemius medialis was recorded using surface electromyography normalized to a submaximal or maximal reference electrical activity (%RVE (reference voluntary electrical activity)/%MVE). Spine and lower limb postures were assessed by gravimetric position sensors, and HR by electrocardiography.
RESULTS: Using the exoskeleton resulted in decreased BF muscle activity [-8.12%RVE], and minor changes in ES [-1.29%MVE], RA [-0.28%RVE], VL [-0.49%RVE], and TD [+1.13%RVE] muscle activity. Hip and knee flexion increased [+8.1°; +6.7°]. Heart rate decreased by 2.1 bpm. Trunk orientation had an influence on BF muscle activity.
CONCLUSION: Using the back exoskeleton in a short sorting task with static trunk posture mainly reduced hip extensor muscle activity and changed lower limb but not spine posture. Implications of using a back exoskeleton for workers' musculoskeletal health need further clarification. APPLICATION: The detected changes by using the Laevo® illustrate the need for further investigation prior to practical recommendations of using exoskeletons in the field. Investigating various work scenarios in different kind of workers and long-term applications would be important elements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive device; back support; electromyography; nonneutral trunk postures; working posture

Year:  2022        PMID: 35225011     DOI: 10.1177/00187208211073192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.

Authors:  Mark Tröster; Sarah Budde; Christophe Maufroy; Michael Skipper Andersen; John Rasmussen; Urs Schneider; Thomas Bauernhansl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton on Knee Joint Loading during Simulated Static Sorting and Dynamic Lifting Tasks.

Authors:  Mona Bär; Tessy Luger; Robert Seibt; Julia Gabriel; Monika A Rieger; Benjamin Steinhilber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.