Literature DB >> 35224426

Video-Based Pose Estimation for Gait Analysis in Stroke Survivors during Clinical Assessments: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Luca Lonini1,2, Yaejin Moon1, Kyle Embry1,2, R James Cotton1,2, Kelly McKenzie1, Sophia Jenz1, Arun Jayaraman1,2.   

Abstract

Recent advancements in deep learning have produced significant progress in markerless human pose estimation, making it possible to estimate human kinematics from single camera videos without the need for reflective markers and specialized labs equipped with motion capture systems. Such algorithms have the potential to enable the quantification of clinical metrics from videos recorded with a handheld camera. Here we used DeepLabCut, an open-source framework for markerless pose estimation, to fine-tune a deep network to track 5 body keypoints (hip, knee, ankle, heel, and toe) in 82 below-waist videos of 8 patients with stroke performing overground walking during clinical assessments. We trained the pose estimation model by labeling the keypoints in 2 frames per video and then trained a convolutional neural network to estimate 5 clinically relevant gait parameters (cadence, double support time, swing time, stance time, and walking speed) from the trajectory of these keypoints. These results were then compared to those obtained from a clinical system for gait analysis (GAITRite®, CIR Systems). Absolute accuracy (mean error) and precision (standard deviation of error) for swing, stance, and double support time were within 0.04 ± 0.11 s; Pearson's correlation with the reference system was moderate for swing times (r = 0.4-0.66), but stronger for stance and double support time (r = 0.93-0.95). Cadence mean error was -0.25 steps/min ± 3.9 steps/min (r = 0.97), while walking speed mean error was -0.02 ± 0.11 m/s (r = 0.92). These preliminary results suggest that single camera videos and pose estimation models based on deep networks could be used to quantify clinically relevant gait metrics in individuals poststroke, even while using assistive devices in uncontrolled environments. Such development opens the door to applications for gait analysis both inside and outside of clinical settings, without the need of sophisticated equipment.
Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Gait analysis; Pose estimation; Stroke; Video analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35224426      PMCID: PMC8832219          DOI: 10.1159/000520732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  22 in total

1.  Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data.

Authors:  A Hreljac; R N Marshall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Changes in gait symmetry and velocity after stroke: a cross-sectional study from weeks to years after stroke.

Authors:  Kara K Patterson; William H Gage; Dina Brooks; Sandra E Black; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Variability in spatiotemporal step characteristics and its relationship to walking performance post-stroke.

Authors:  Chitralakshmi K Balasubramanian; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; William C Rose; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 5.  Toward Pervasive Gait Analysis With Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shanshan Chen; John Lach; Benny Lo; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.772

6.  DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning.

Authors:  Alexander Mathis; Pranav Mamidanna; Kevin M Cury; Taiga Abe; Venkatesh N Murthy; Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Katja Wagner; Katja Rutte; Daniel Meissner; Marcus Pohl
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Measuring Gait Variables Using Computer Vision to Assess Mobility and Fall Risk in Older Adults With Dementia.

Authors:  Kimberley-Dale Ng; Sina Mehdizadeh; Andrea Iaboni; Avril Mansfield; Alastair Flint; Babak Taati
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.316

9.  Two-dimensional video-based analysis of human gait using pose estimation.

Authors:  Jan Stenum; Cristina Rossi; Ryan T Roemmich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Fall-related functional impairments in patients with neurological gait disorder.

Authors:  Angela Ehrhardt; Pascal Hostettler; Lucas Widmer; Katja Reuter; Jens Alexander Petersen; Dominik Straumann; Linard Filli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility of Markerless Motion Capture for Three-Dimensional Gait Assessment in Community Settings.

Authors:  Theresa E McGuirk; Elliott S Perry; Wandasun B Sihanath; Sherveen Riazati; Carolynn Patten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Absolute Reliability of Gait Parameters Acquired With Markerless Motion Capture in Living Domains.

Authors:  Sherveen Riazati; Theresa E McGuirk; Elliott S Perry; Wandasun B Sihanath; Carolynn Patten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Automatic extraction of upper-limb kinematic activity using deep learning-based markerless tracking during deep brain stimulation implantation for Parkinson's disease: A proof of concept study.

Authors:  Sunderland Baker; Anand Tekriwal; Gidon Felsen; Elijah Christensen; Lisa Hirt; Steven G Ojemann; Daniel R Kramer; Drew S Kern; John A Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.