| Literature DB >> 35224164 |
Hao Yuan1,2, Xuelian Wu1, Xiaomin Wang3, Chengfu Yuan1.
Abstract
Astragalus and Angelica decoction (A&A) has been clinically used as a classical traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula in China for many years for the treatment of kidney diseases, especially renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF). However, the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of A&A on RIF remains poorly understood. In the present study, systematic network pharmacology and effective experimental verification were utilized for the first time to elucidate the pharmacological efficacy and potential mechanism. The outcomes indicated that 22 active components and 87 target genes of A&A were identified and cross-referenced with RIF-associated genes, contributing to confirmation of 74 target genes of A&A for RIF. Pathway and functional enrichment analyses revealed that A&A had substantial effects on MAPK, PI3K-Akt and TNF signaling pathways. In addition, seven core targets with relatively higher betweenness and degree were identified in the constructed Chinese medicine material-chemical component-target-signal pathway network. Moreover, we verified the potential therapeutic effect of A&A in vivo (using a mouse model of RIF), confirming that A&A could effectively protect the kidney by regulating these target genes. The therapeutic effect of A&A on RIF could be attributed to its role in regulating the cell cycle, limiting the apoptosis, and inhibiting the inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: Active components; Astragalus and angelica decoction; Network pharmacology; Renal interstitial fibrosis; Target gene
Year: 2020 PMID: 35224164 PMCID: PMC8843878 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Dis ISSN: 2352-3042
Figure 1Component-target network diagram. The diamond node represents compound in A&A. The oval node represents the target. Different colors represent the degree, as the scale indicates.
Component and target of A&A.
| Herb | Component | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Angelica | Beta-sitosterol, stigmasterol | PGR,NCOA2,PTGS1,ADRA1A,CHRNA2,GABRA1,CASP9, |
| CASP3,CASP8,PRKCA,PON1,NR3C2,NCOA1,PLAU,CTRB1, | ||
| Astragalus | Mairin, jaranol, | PGR,PTGS1,AR,ESR2,CHEK1,PRSS1,NCOA2,GABRA1, |
| hederagenin,7-O-methylisomucronulatol, | GRIA2,ADH1B,ESR1,GSK3B,NCOA1,F7,ACHE,RELA,OLR1, | |
| (24S)-24-Propylcholesta-5-ene-3β-ol, isorhamnetin, | HTR3A,ADRA2C,ADRA1A,RXRB,PPARG,IKBKB,AHSA1, | |
| 3,9-di-O-methylnissolin, | CASP3,MAPK8,CYP3A4,CYP1A1,ICAM1,SELE,VCAM1, | |
| 5′-hydroxyiso-muronulatol-2′, 5′-di-O-glucoside, | CYP1B1,ALOX5,GSTP1,AHR,PSMD3,NR1I3,DIO1,GSTM1, | |
| isomucronulatol-7,2′-di-O-glucosiole, | GSTM2,AKR1C3,MMP3,EGFR,VEGFA,CCND1,FOS,EIF6, | |
| 9,10-dimethoxypterocarpan-3-O-β-D-glucoside, | CASP9,PLAU,EGF,RB1,IL6,TP53,NFKBIA,POR,CASP8,RAF1, | |
| fulvic acids (FA), astrapterocarpan, bifendate, | PRKCA,HIF1A,RUNX1T1,ERBB2,ACACA,CAV1,MYC, | |
| formononetin, isoflavanone, calycosin, kaempferol, | PTGER3,BIRC5,DUOX2,HSPB1,NFE2L2,NQO1,PARP1, | |
| quercetin, 1,7-Dihydroxy-3,9-dimethoxypterocarpene, | DCAF5,CHEK2,HSF1,CRP,RUNX2,CTSD,IGFBP3,IRF1, | |
| (3R)-3-(2-hydroxy-3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)chroman-7-ol | ERBB3,PON1,NPEPPS,HK2,RASA1 |
Abbreviations: A&A, astragalus and angelica decoction; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; RIF, renal interstitial fibrosis; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 2Venn diagram and functional analysis. (A) The intersection of disease targets and candidate targets in A&A. (B) GO enrichment entries in the top 10. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment entries in the top 30. (D) The complicated relationship between target genes and KEGG terms in A&A.
Figure 3Chinese medicine material-chemical component-target-signal pathway network diagram. The round rectangle shape represents two Chinese herbal medicines; the diamond represents the chemical composition; the oval represents the target; and the triangle represents the signal path.
Figure 4A&A improves renal function in mice with RIF. (A) The changes of serum SCr of kidney-injured mice in diffident groups, #P < 0.01; ∗P < 0.05 (n = 10). (B) The changes of serum BUN of kidney-injured mice in diffident groups, #P < 0.01; ∗P < 0.05 (n = 10). (C) The changes of renal histopathology in mice of different groups by Masson staining (400×). (D) Statistical analysis of positive interstitial fibrotic area in different groups, #P < 0.01; ∗P < 0.05 (n = 10).
Figure 5The expressions of core targets at the mRNA and protein levels in renal tissue. (A) Relative expressions of several genes at the mRNA level in the kidney of mice in different groups. (B) Western blotting analysis of several proteins in the kidney of mice in different groups. #P < 0.01, compared with the sham group. ∗P < 0.05 compared with the UUO group (n = 6).
Figure 6Expressions and immunohistochemistry analysis of NFκB and P53 in different groups. Representative immunohistochemistry results of NFkB (A) and P53 (B) expressions in different groups (400×). Statistical analysis of positive area was performed by Image J in different groups based on the IHC results. P < 0.05 compared with the sham group. ∗P < 0.05 compared with the UUO group (n = 10).