Literature DB >> 35224000

Editorial: The Role of RNA in Genome Stability: To Wreck or Repair?

Belén Gómez-González1,2, Arijit Dutta3, Wenyi Feng4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage repair; DNA-RNA hybrid; DSB repair; R-loop; genome stability; transcription

Year:  2022        PMID: 35224000      PMCID: PMC8865954          DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.848217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Mol Biosci        ISSN: 2296-889X


× No keyword cloud information.
It has long been known that the process of transcription is a source of genetic instability. RNA molecules have been implicated in both the generation of DNA damage and, in the recent years, in its repair. These seemingly conflicting roles of RNA motivated us to open this research topic covering transcription-associated genetic instability sources and the role of RNA in the repair of DNA damage. The genome is challenged by both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage. Additionally, failures in DNA metabolic processes, such as replication impairments or chromosomal miss-segregation, can threaten the transmission of the genetic information to the offspring by causing genome and chromosome instability. In particular, DNA transcription increases the frequency of mutation and recombination; this latter being caused, although not exclusively, by increased number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are among the most harmful DNA lesions (Gaillard and Aguilera, 2016). RNA transcripts are constantly generated to supply for protein synthesis, RNA interference pathways, and regulation of transcription, translation, splicing as well as DNA repair processes via non-coding RNAs. Even heterochromatic regions can generate RNA molecules at telomeres (Azzalin et al., 2007; Luke et al., 2008; Schoeftner and Blasco, 2008) and centromeres (Saffery et al., 2003), that participate in the regulation of the telomeric (Fukagawa et al., 2004) and centromeric structures, thus impacting chromosome segregation and chromosome instability. The diverse roles of human centromeric RNA in chromosome stability were compiled by Leclerc and Kitagawa in this Frontiers Topic. Nascent RNA molecules can potentially re-anneal with the DNA template to form DNA-RNA hybrids within ORFs (Huertas and Aguilera, 2003) and at transcription termination regions (Mischo et al., 2011) but also in telomeric (Luke et al., 2008) or centromeric regions (Kabeche et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2021) and it is well established that DNA-RNA hybrids and R-loops, formed by the hybrid and the displaced single stranded DNA, are a major source of replication fork problems and ultimately DSBs (Gomez-Gonzalez and Aguilera, 2019). Thus, the odds of a transcribing DNA molecule to suffer DSBs are higher than a non-transcribing equivalent. In this Frontiers Topic, Long et al. describe how DSBs within a transcribed DNA causes a transient transcriptional shut-down but, at the same time, the DSB-induced transcripts are produced de novo and participate in DNA damage signaling (Francia et al., 2012; Michelini et al., 2017). The context in which the DNA breaks occur can affect the outcome of the repair mechanisms. Most of this effect is likely due to transcription-mediated changes in the chromatin status (Aymard et al., 2014; Clouaire and Legube, 2015). Notwithstanding, the potential impact of RNA molecules on DSB repair is emerging as a new controversial, but fascinating, field of study. For instance, RNA molecules can impact DNA damage repair directly or indirectly by recruiting new protein factors involved in DNA damage signaling or repair. In fact, an increasing number of RNA-binding proteins appear to have a role in the DNA damage response, specifically to DSBs, as examined here by Klaric et al. Most of them were already studied for their functions in RNA metabolism, with the expected involvement in gene expression, but recently have been re-discovered to play additional functions in the regulation of DSB signaling and repair. It is of note that several RNA-binding proteins have an intrinsically disordered region (IDR), such as that in the Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which can function as an R-loop reader as shown by Dettori et al. in this Frontiers topic (Dettori et al.). Moreover, IDRs could facilitate dynamic assembly of protein complexes including R-loop resolvases such as DHX9 via liquid-liquid phase separation to promote R-loop resolution. Adding a new layer of complexity, the affinity of RNA-binding proteins for RNA can be modulated by different posttranscriptional chemical modifications of the RNA molecule, creating a plethora of possible combinatorial epi-transcriptomic signatures that offer a high-level regulation to the DNA damage response. A prime example would be the N6-Methyladenosine (m6A), which, as reviewed by Qu et al. and Jimeno et al., modulates repair and genome stability (Qu et al.; Jimeno et al.). These review articles have summarized the recent findings on the role of RNA modifiers, such as RNA methyltransferase METTL3 and m6A RNA reader YTHDC1, in promoting DSB repair via homologous recombination (Zhang et al., 2020). Furthermore, the RNA molecule can also be edited, and A-to-I deamination via ADAR2 can also directly influence DSB repair by promoting R-loop resolution, facilitating DNA end resection to initiate homology-dependent repair (Jimeno et al., 2021a). A growing number of reports have revealed that DSBs stimulate the formation of DNA-RNA hybrids (Aguilera and Gomez-Gonzalez, 2017) and some RNA-binding proteins can counteract or unwind the formation of hybrids at DSBs, as shown for Senataxin or DDX5 helicases among others (Cohen et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2020) (see Klaric et al. for a complete review). Strikingly, the DNA damage response can take advantage of this ability to promote efficient DNA damage repair, as exemplified by BRCA2 promoting DDX5 activity at damaged DNA (Sessa et al., 2021) or by BRCA1 interacting with Senataxin and the RNAi machinery to promote the repair of nicks at transcription termination pause sites (Hatchi et al., 2021). However, the role of DNA-RNA hybrids at DSBs remains controversial (Marnef and Legube, 2021). Whereas it has been put forth that accidental formation of the DNA-RNA hybrids at DSBs can interfere with homologous recombination repair (Ortega et al., 2021), it has also been suggested that hybrids are intermediates required for repair (Keskin et al., 2014; Ohle et al., 2016; D'Alessandro et al., 2018; Lu et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021; Ouyang et al., 2021). This Frontiers topic covers the most recent findings concerning the roles of RNA in genome stability and DNA repair mechanisms. We hope that the readers will find this collection of articles educational and useful for their own study to further advance this emerging field of research.
  30 in total

1.  Cotranscriptionally formed DNA:RNA hybrids mediate transcription elongation impairment and transcription-associated recombination.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Transcription within a functional human centromere.

Authors:  Richard Saffery; Huseyin Sumer; Sara Hassan; Lee H Wong; Jeffrey M Craig; Kazuo Todokoro; Melissa Anderson; Angela Stafford; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  METTL3 and N6-Methyladenosine Promote Homologous Recombination-Mediated Repair of DSBs by Modulating DNA-RNA Hybrid Accumulation.

Authors:  Canfeng Zhang; Liping Chen; Di Peng; Ao Jiang; Yunru He; Yanru Zeng; Chen Xie; Haoxian Zhou; Xiaotong Luo; Haiying Liu; Liang Chen; Jian Ren; Wengong Wang; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  RNA polymerase III is required for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Sijie Liu; Yu Hua; Jingna Wang; Lingyan Li; Junjie Yuan; Bo Zhang; Ziyang Wang; Jianguo Ji; Daochun Kong
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Developmentally regulated transcription of mammalian telomeres by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  Stefan Schoeftner; Maria A Blasco
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  The Rat1p 5' to 3' exonuclease degrades telomeric repeat-containing RNA and promotes telomere elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Brian Luke; Andrea Panza; Sophie Redon; Nahid Iglesias; Zhijian Li; Joachim Lingner
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Damage-induced lncRNAs control the DNA damage response through interaction with DDRNAs at individual double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Flavia Michelini; Sethuramasundaram Pitchiaya; Valerio Vitelli; Sheetal Sharma; Ubaldo Gioia; Fabio Pessina; Matteo Cabrini; Yejun Wang; Ilaria Capozzo; Fabio Iannelli; Valentina Matti; Sofia Francia; G V Shivashankar; Nils G Walter; Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  Transcription-mediated replication hindrance: a major driver of genome instability.

Authors:  Belén Gómez-González; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  Transcription as a Threat to Genome Integrity.

Authors:  Hélène Gaillard; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 23.643

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.