| Literature DB >> 35223802 |
Yu-Li Zhang1, Yang Huang2,3, Ping-Yang Wang1, Qiang Li4, Li-Hui Bi1, Ai-Chun Zhao2, Zhong-Huai Xiang2, Ding-Pei Long2.
Abstract
Diapause is an important biological characteristic for many insect species to adapt to adverse environmental conditions and maintain the continuity of the race. Compared with the traditional hydrochloric acid or/and cold storage treatment methods, the artificial corona incubation technology of silkworm (Bombyx mori) eggs has many advantages including, the absence of pollution, easy operation and safety. However, this technology has not yet been applied in sericulture. In this study, we developed a novel artificial corona instrument to successfully disrupt the diapause of newly laid and refrigerated eggs from various Chinese and Japanese lineage silkworm strains. Subsequently, we invented a very early corona treatment (VECT) strategy to prevent the diapause of newly laid silkworm eggs within 4 h of oviposition. The hatching rates of the larvae were more than 95% in all diapause silkworm strains, which was comparable to the effect of the traditional HCl treatment strategy. In addition, we developed a combination strategy of VECT and pre-blastoderm microinjection and successfully created transgenic silkworms in various diapause strains. The results of the current study can aid in improving the corona artificial incubation technology and promote its application in sericulture.Entities:
Keywords: Bombyx mori; artificial incubation; corona treatment; egg diapause; germline transformation; insect
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223802 PMCID: PMC8874202 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.843543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Composition of the self-made GZ-01 artificial corona instrument and the range of action of the corona treatment on silkworm eggs. (A) Photographs of eggs processed by the GZ-01 corona instrument. (B) Illustration of the GZ-01 corona incubator: 1) metal shell of the high voltage direct current power supply; 2) power plug (connected to a 220 V household alternating current source); 3) power switch; 4) voltage adjusting knob; 5) voltage display (0–15 kV); 6) negative connection line (red); 7) positive connection line (green); 8) negative and 9) positive electrode metal plates (l = 15 cm, w = 8 cm, h = 18 mm); 10) insulation supports; 11) metal pole needle (length = 10 mm, pole pitch = 8 mm); 12) base; 13) Kraft paper covered with eggs. (C) Photograph of the corona discharge in weak light. (D) Photograph of the effect of corona treatment in preventing the diapause of newly laid DZ eggs. d, the diameter of the circular area of the eggshells.
FIGURE 2Comparison of the effects of corona and HCl treatments in preventing the diapause of eggs at 20 h after oviposition. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental process of treating newly laid eggs under different conditions and comparing the larval hatchability. (B) Image of the grouping of DZ eggs at 20 h after oviposition from one brood. (C) Images of the newly laid DZ eggs at different developmental stages from different treatment groups. Red arrows indicate the heads of the larvae developing in the eggs; red triangles indicate the eggshells left by the larvae after hatching. (D) The hatching rates of the larvae from different treatment groups of each strain. Error bars represent one standard deviation (n = 3; n.s., not significant; ***p < 0.001).
FIGURE 3Comparison of the effects of corona and HCl treatments in terminating the diapause of refrigerated eggs. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental process of treating the refrigerated diapausing eggs under different conditions and comparing the larval hatchability. (B) Images of the refrigerated diapausing DZ eggs at different developmental stages from different treatment groups. Red arrows indicate the heads of larvae developing in the eggs; red triangles indicate the eggshells left by the larvae after hatching. (C) The hatching rates of larvae from the different treatment groups of each strain. Error bars represent one standard deviation (n = 3; n.s., not significant; ***p < 0.001).
FIGURE 4VECT-mediated artificial incubation of eggs within 4 h of oviposition. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental process of treating newly laid eggs within 4 h of oviposition by VECT. (B) Line charts of the larval hatching rates of the DZ eggs treated with a combination of different conditions within 4 h of oviposition. Error bars represent one standard deviation (n = 3). (C) The larval hatching rates of the newly laid eggs from other commercial parental strains following corona treatment for 1 min at 2 h after oviposition. The eggs of each strain that were not subjected to any treatment were considered the control. Error bars represent one standard deviation (n = 3; n.s., not significant; ***p < 0.001).
FIGURE 5Germline transformation of diapause silkworm strains based on the VECT strategy combined with pre-blastoderm microinjection. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental procedures for germline transformation of diapause silkworm strains. (B) Images of the developmental stages of G0 DZ eggs without or with VECT after injection of piggyBac-derived vectors. (C) Expression of the EGFP gene in adult G1 transgenic silkworms. Adults of the wild-type DZ (WT) and G1 transgenic silkworms (TS) showing a white light, and GFP fluorescence in the compound eye.
Statistical results of injecting a mixture of pBac and pHA3PIG vectors into silkworm embryos of different strains.
| Strain | Selected strategy for germline transformation | Injected eggs | Hatched eggs (%) | G1 broods | G1 broods with GFP-positive larvae (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DZ | Control | 423 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 (0) |
| DZ | VECT | 386 | 174 (45.08) | 76 | 4 (5.26) |
| DT | VECT | 374 | 135 (36.1) | 57 | 5 (8.77) |
| BB | VECT | 448 | 215 (47.99) | 68 | 11 (16.18) |
| 932 | VECT | 432 | 246 (56.94) | 89 | 3 (3.37) |
| 7532 | VECT | 398 | 150 (37.69) | 54 | 7 (12.96) |
Percentage of (Number of hatched eggs)/(Number of injected eggs).
Percentage of (Number of G1 broods with GFP-positive larvae)/(Number of G1 broods).
Eggs that were not subjected to any treatment were considered the control.
Optimised VECT, strategy, eggs at 2 h after oviposition were subjected to corona treatment (voltage, 12 kV; pole pitch, 8 mm) for 1 min, followed by microinjection.