| Literature DB >> 35223784 |
Md Abu Saleh1, Shafi Mahmud1, Sarah Albogami2, Ahmed M El-Shehawi2, Gobindo Kumar Paul1, Shirmin Islam1, Amit Kumar Dutta3, Md Salah Uddin1, Shahriar Zaman1.
Abstract
The complete hydrolysis of xylan can be facilitated by the coordinated action of xylanase and other de-branching enzymes. Here, a GH43 α-l-arabinofuranosidase/β-xylosidase (CAX43) from Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus was cloned, sequenced, and biochemically investigated. The interaction of the enzyme with various substrates was also studied. With a half-life of 120 h at 70°C, the produced protein performed maximum activity at pH 6.0 and 70°C. The enzyme demonstrated a higher activity (271.062 ± 4.83 U/mg) against para nitrophenol (pNP) α-L-arabinofuranosides. With xylanase (XynA), the enzyme had a higher degree of synergy (2.30) in a molar ratio of 10:10 (nM). The interaction of the enzyme with three substrates, pNP α-L-arabinofuranosides, pNP β-D-xylopyranosides, and sugar beet arabinan, was investigated using protein modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. During the simulation time, the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the enzyme was below 2.5 Å, demonstrating structural stability. Six, five, and seven binding-interacting residues were confirmed against pNP α-L-arabinofuranosides, pNP β-D-xylopyranosides, and arabinan, respectively, in molecular docking experiments. This biochemical and in silico study gives a new window for understanding the GH43 family's structural stability and substrate recognition, potentially leading to biological insights and rational enzyme engineering for a new generation of enzymes that perform better and have greater biorefinery utilization.Entities:
Keywords: Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus; biochemical characterization; molecular dynamics; α-l-arabinofuranosidase; β-xylosidase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223784 PMCID: PMC8881100 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.810542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Production and characterization of CAX43. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified recombinant protein. Lanes: M, the standard protein molecular weight markers; 1, the recombinant protein purified by Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography. (B) The effect of pH, (C) the effect of temperature, and (D) thermal inactivation at different temperatures. All the reactions were conducted in citric acid phosphate buffer and pNP α-L-arabinofuranosides as a substrate.
FIGURE 2Synergistic effects of CAX43 with XynA. A series of enzyme combinations (molar ratio) were used. All reactions were performed at pH 6 and 70°C against wheat arabinoxylan for two different time durations (12 and 24 h). Reducing sugars were measured by DNS method.
Synergistic effect of XynA and CAX43 in various combinations (nM) on wheat arabinoxylan. Data were recorded after 24 h of incubation.
| Enzyme ratio (nM) XynA/CAX43 | Amount of sugars released (mM) ± SD | Degree of synergy |
|---|---|---|
| 10:2 | 11.403 ± 0.295 | 1.228a |
| 10:5 | 15.310 ± 0.335 | 1.820b |
| 10:10 | 18.806 ± 0.310 | 2.301d |
| 10:50 | 17.606 ± 0.203 | 2.212d |
| 10:100 | 15.311 ± 0.401 | 2.036c |
| 10:200 | 14.703 ± 0.500 | 1.866b |
*Different letters indicate significant differences between mean ± SD of treatments (n = 3) at a p < 0.05 significance level.
FIGURE 3The quality assessment of the hypothetical protein (A) root mean square deviation of the model protein and (B) the root mean square fluctuation of the hypothetical model.
FIGURE 4The hypothetical model protein of glycoside hydrolase (A) surface view of the predicted protein and (B) cartoon view of the protein model.
The binding interactions of the docked complexes. The binding residues were analyzed in Discovery Studio software package.
| Complex | Residues | Bond type | Distance (Å) | Energy (Kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Asp26 | Hydrogen bond | 2.46 | −8.7 |
| Asp133 | Hydrogen bond | 2.70 | ||
| Glu191 | Hydrogen bond | 2.76 | ||
| Gly209 | Hydrogen bond | 3.09 | ||
| Ile190 | Pi-alkyl | 5.21 | ||
| Pro207 | Pi-alkyl | 4.67 | ||
|
| Gln246 | Hydrogen bond | 2.16 | −7.8 |
| Glu191 | Hydrogen bond | 2.34 | ||
| Gly214 | Hydrogen bond | 2.95 | ||
| Asp133 | Hydrogen bond | 2.36 | ||
| Gly209 | Hydrogen bond | 2.94 | ||
| His245 | Pi–Pi stacked | 4.89 | ||
| Arabinan | Ile487 | Hydrogen bond | 2.92 | −8.3 |
| Glu485 | Hydrogen bond | 2.31 | ||
| Asp133 | Hydrogen bond | 2.77 | ||
| Gly266 | Hydrogen bond | 3.06 | ||
| Gly81 | Hydrogen bond | 2.85 | ||
| Gly269 | Hydrogen bond | 2.49 | ||
| Arg270 | Hydrogen bond | 3.08 |
FIGURE 5The binding interactions of the ligand molecules; control system; and protein (A) pNP α-L-arabinofuranosides, (B) pNP β-D-xylopyranosides, (C) arabinan, and (D) control system and protein complex.