| Literature DB >> 35223718 |
Ying Xu1, Yaping Luo1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between adult children's education attainment and their parents' cognitive health, and to further explore the mechanism of intergenerational support. Based on empirical analysis of data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey, our study finds a positive association between children's educational attainment and parents' cognitive health. This correlation is provided for by emotional communication of informal caregiving, financial support, and healthy behaviors shaped in the parents by adult children. The strength of the effect varied by the adult child's gender. While sons' education attainment significantly improves parental cognitive parameters through informal caregiving, financial support, and development of healthy behaviors, the effect of daughters' education derives from financial support and healthy behaviors, not being related to informal caregiving. The study enriches the evidence on the mobility of children's human capital toward their parents and provides practical insights for advancing children's participation in family caregiving.Entities:
Keywords: adult children; cognitive health; education attainment; health; intergenerational support
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223718 PMCID: PMC8864153 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.744333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1The analysis framework.
Descriptive statistics.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Mental status | 30,271 | 3.500 | 1.570 | 0 | 5 |
| Serial-7s | 30,244 | 2.610 | 2.000 | 0 | 5 |
|
| |||||
| Children's education | 29,490 | 4.930 | 2.070 | 1 | 11 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Age | 31,090 | 64.860 | 10.720 | 45 | 90 |
| Gender | 32,084 | 0.490 | 0.500 | 0 | 1 |
| Hukou | 27,291 | 0.170 | 0.380 | 0 | 1 |
| Residence | 31,949 | 0.160 | 0.370 | 0 | 1 |
| Education | 27,329 | 3.120 | 1.880 | 1 | 10 |
| Marital status | 32,077 | 2.180 | 1.770 | 1 | 7 |
| Childhood health | 29,674 | 2.740 | 1.150 | 1 | 5 |
| Basic health insurance | 31,854 | 0.800 | 0.400 | 0 | 1 |
| Life satisfaction | 29,871 | 2.630 | 0.800 | 1 | 5 |
|
| |||||
| Log of total income | 21,460 | 8.370 | 2.010 | 0.690 | 15.420 |
| Log of housing size | 17,160 | 5.140 | 0.770 | 3.000 | 13.410 |
| Flush toilet | 24,571 | 0.400 | 0.490 | 0 | 1 |
| Running water | 31,610 | 0.740 | 0.440 | 0 | 1 |
| Interior neatness | 31,499 | 3.150 | 1.190 | 1 | 5 |
|
| |||||
| Children's age | 31,553 | 37.550 | 10.100 | 18 | 63 |
| Children's income level | 22,504 | 5.610 | 2.250 | 1 | 12 |
| Children's occupation category | 24,489 | 4.320 | 1.470 | 1 | 6 |
| Number of surviving children | 31,905 | 3.950 | 2.050 | 1 | 16 |
| Children category | 31,413 | 1.340 | 0.620 | 0 | 4 |
|
| |||||
| Average frequency of seeing (AFS) | 30,287 | 5.120 | 2.090 | 1 | 10 |
| Average frequency of contact (AFC) | 26,630 | 4.800 | 2.350 | 1 | 10 |
| Log of average financial support (LAFS) | 26,303 | 6.930 | 1.320 | 3.28 | 13.3 |
| Social activities (SA) | 30,295 | 0.538 | 0.499 | 0 | 1 |
| Ever smoked (ES) | 31,912 | 0.460 | 0.500 | 0 | 1 |
Note: Log refers to logarithm. Handling of outliers in this table: Tailor the age of parents and the age of children to between 0 and 99 years. Take the logarithm of the housing size and financial support and then tailor them to the range of 0–100.
Results of benchmark regression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Children's education | 0.245*** | 0.184*** | 0.055*** | 0.056*** |
| (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Parents' age | −0.022*** | −0.019*** | ||
| (0.00) | (0.00) | |||
| Parents' gender | 0.273*** | 0.217*** | ||
| (0.04) | (0.04) | |||
| Parents' Hukou | 0.052 | 0.099* | ||
| (0.05) | (0.06) | |||
| Parents' residence | 0.195*** | 0.216*** | ||
| (0.06) | (0.07) | |||
| Parents' education | 0.237*** | 0.201*** | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Parents' marital status | −0.075*** | −0.055*** | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Childhood health | −0.050*** | −0.049*** | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Basic health insurance | 0.021 | 0.002 | ||
| (0.05) | (0.04) | |||
| Life satisfaction | −0.060*** | −0.060*** | ||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||
| Log of total income | 0.016* | 0.020** | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Log of housing size | −0.013 | −0.013 | ||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | |||
| Toilet flushable | 0.066* | 0.054 | ||
| (0.04) | (0.03) | |||
| Running water | 0.008 | 0.002 | ||
| (0.04) | (0.03) | |||
| Interior neatness | −0.031** | −0.031** | ||
| (0.02) | (0.01) | |||
| Children's age | 0.008** | 0.008** | ||
| (0.00) | (0.00) | |||
| Children's income level | 0.027*** | 0.021*** | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Children's occupation category | −0.014 | −0.011 | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Number of surviving children | −0.003 | −0.003 | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Constant term | 2.322 | 3.896*** | ||
| (0.02) | (0.24) | |||
|
| 28,019 | 28,019 | 5,371 | 5,371 |
|
| 0.110 | 0.036 | 0.220 | 0.079 |
Note: *, **, and *** mean significance at 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 levels. Robust standard errors in parentheses. The last row in model 2 and model 4 is Pseudo_R.
The marginal effects of benchmark regression model (4).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children's | −0.003 | −0.005 | −0.006 | −0.005 | −0.001 | 0.021 |
| (0.000) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.000) | (0.002) |
Note: *** means significance at 0.01 levels. Robust standard errors in parentheses. Due to space limitations, we only show the marginal results for the core independent variables.
Heterogeneity analysis results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Children's education | 0.050** | 0.061*** | 0.056*** | 0.053*** |
| (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 1,496 | 3,666 | 2,932 | 2,418 |
| 0.078 | 0.083 | 0.087 | 0.075 |
Note: ** and *** mean significance at 0.05, and 0.01 levels. Robust standard errors in parentheses. Heterogeneity was tested using the Oprobit model. Due to space limitations, the estimated parameters of control variables are not reported in this table, and readers can connect us for the detail results.
Mechanism analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Children's education | 0.014 | −0.051*** | 0.071*** | 0.041*** | −0.044*** | |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | ||
| Children's education * AFS | 0.002** | |||||
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 5,135 | 5,135 | 4,555 | 4,634 | 5,371 | 5,371 |
| 0.009 | 0.078 | 0.025 ( | 0.130 | 0.027 | 0.456 |
Note: *, **, and *** mean significance at 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 levels. Robust standard errors in parentheses. Due to space limitations, the estimated parameters of control variables are not reported in this table, and readers can connect us for the detail results.
Mechanism analysis by gender.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sons' education | 0.029*** | 0.064*** | 0.041*** | −0.046*** | |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | ||
| Sons' education * AFS | 0.004*** | ||||
| Daughters' education | −0.007 | 0.084*** | 0.037*** | −0.049** | |
| Daughters' education * AFS | (0.01) | −0.001 | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) |
|
| 3,159 | 3,159 | 2,816 | 3,279 | 3,279 |
| 0.001 | 0.046 | 0.120 ( | 0.038 | 0.040 |
Note: *, **, and *** mean significance at 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 levels. The above tests omit the reporting control variables, and the control variables selected are the same as in the benchmark regression. Robust standard errors in parentheses. Due to space limitations, the estimated parameters of control variables are not reported in this table, and readers can connect us for the detail results.