| Literature DB >> 35223593 |
Juan Tang1, Li Fan2, Chunlei Lv3, Runjie Wan4, Jianjian Liu4, Xiaoyan Liu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of Shenqi Jiangtang granules-assisted Western medicine in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Entities:
Keywords: Adverse pregnancy outcome; Clinical efficacy; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Shenqi Jiangtang granules
Year: 2021 PMID: 35223593 PMCID: PMC8826322 DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
General information of patients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 0.396 | 0.820 | |||
| <32 | 31 | 29 | 28 | ||
| ≥32 | 18 | 20 | 21 | ||
| Pregnancy BMI(kg/m2) | 1.202 | 0.548 | |||
| <25 | 34 | 36 | 31 | ||
| ≥25 | 15 | 13 | 18 | ||
| Family history of diabetes | 0.843 | 0.656 | |||
| Yes | 13 | 17 | 14 | ||
| No | 36 | 32 | 35 | ||
| Inoculation times | 1.048 | 0.592 | |||
| For the first time | 25 | 30 | 27 | ||
| ≥2 | 24 | 19 | 22 | ||
| The number of abortion | 1.869 | 0.760 | |||
| No | 38 | 41 | 36 | ||
| 1 or 2 | 9 | 7 | 10 | ||
| ≥3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| Early pregnancyHb(g/L) | 1.816 | 0.403 | |||
| <130 | 37 | 35 | 31 | ||
| ≥130 | 12 | 14 | 18 | ||
| Early pregnancyCRP(mg/L) | 0.443 | 0.801 | |||
| <8 | 34 | 32 | 35 | ||
| ≥8 | 15 | 17 | 14 |
Fig. 1:Comparison in clinical efficacy among the three groups (%)
Fig. 2:Comparison in Total efficacy among the three groups (%)
Fig. 3:Comparison of blood glucose levels in the three groups before and after treatment (x̄±s)
Fig. 4:Comparison of lipid levels in the three groups before and after treatment (x̄±s)
Comparison in oxidative stress indicators among the three groups(x̄±s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | TCM combined with | 49 | 17.63±2.21 | 107.62±13.14 | 74.45±8.48 |
| Treatment | Western medicine group | ||||
| Western medicine group | 49 | 17.72±2.18 | 113.25±12.07 | 72.36±6.59 | |
| Control group | 49 | 17.76±2.33 | 115.49±11.73 | 72.64±7.65 | |
| After | TCM combined with | 49 | 25.04±5.36[ | 204.87±16.35[ | 48.66±4.37[ |
| Treatment | Western medicine group | ||||
| Western medicine group | 49 | 22.15±4.54[ | 182.67±17.42[ | 56.85±4.32[ | |
| Control group | 49 | 19.84±5.47 | 151.73±14.86 | 64.02±5.93 | |
|
| 9.642 | 13.174 | 10.833 | ||
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Notes: Comparison in the same group before and after treatment,
P < 0. 05; compared with the control group after treatment,
P < 0. 05,
P < 0. 05; GSH-Px: glutathione peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; MDA: malondialde-hyde
Changes in the levels of inflammatory cytokines (x̄ ± s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | TCM combined with Western | 49 | 195.69±21.37 | 6.42±0.76 | 7.71±0.66 |
| Treatment | medicine group | ||||
| Western medicine group | 49 | 197.24±20.57 | 6.50±0.73 | 7.58±0.73 | |
| Control group | 49 | 194.33±21.92 | 6.52±0.81 | 7.66±0.71 | |
| After | TCM combined with Western | 49 | 114.78±15.05[ | 2.71±0.43[ | 4.95±0.54[ |
| Treatment | medicine group | ||||
| Western medicine group | 49 | 139.41±16.64 | 3.83±0.42 | 5.67±0.52 | |
| Control group | 49 | 167.04±15.71 | 5.14±0.37 | 6.15±0.46 | |
|
| 15.456 | 5.413 | 7.295 | ||
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Notes: Comparison in the same group before and after treatment,
P < 0. 05; compared with the control group after treatment,
P < 0. 05,
P < 0. 05; IL-6: interleukin-6; hs-CRP: hypersensitive C-reactive protein; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α
Comparison in mode of delivery among the three groups[N(%)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCM combined with Western medicine group | 49 | 36 (73.50) | 9 (18.37) | 4 (8.16) | 0 (0) |
| Western medicine group | 49 | 28 (57.14) | 13 (26.53) | 6 (12.24) | 2 (4.08) |
| Control group | 49 | 17 (34.69) | 16 (32.65) | 11 (22.45) | 5 (10.20) |
Fig. 5:Comparison of complications among three groups of pregnant women
Fig. 6:Comparison of complications among three groups of fetal and neonatal
Logistic Regression analysis on risk factors of complications in pregnant women, fetus and neonates (P<0.01)
|
|
|
|---|---|
| History of DM | |
| Yes | 2.37 (1.31–3.97) |
| No | 1.0 |
| Age>32 years | |
| Yes | 1.09 (1.02–1.16) |
| No | 1.0 |
| BMI≥25kg/m2 | |
| Yes | 3.51 (1.59–7.72) |
| No | 1.0 |