| Literature DB >> 35223549 |
Qian Guo1,2,3, Can Ni1,2, Linjing Li4, Mo Li2, Xiaoqing Jiang2, Li Gao1, Huaiqiu Zhu2,3, Juexian Song1.
Abstract
As a life-threatening disease, stroke is the leading cause of death and also induces adult disability worldwide. To investigate the efficacy of the integrated traditional Chinese medicine (ITCM) on the therapeutic effects of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, we enrolled 26 patients in the ITCM [Tanhuo decoction (THD) + Western medicine (WM)] group and 23 in the WM group. Thirty healthy people were also included in the healthy control (HC) group. ITCM achieved better functional outcomes than WM, including significant reduction of the phlegm-heat syndrome and neurological impairment, and improvement of ability. These facts were observed in different pretreatment gut enterotypes. In this paper, we collected the stool samples of all participants and analyzed the 16S rRNA sequence data of the gut microbiota. We identified two enterotypes (Type-A and Type-B) of the gut microbial community in AIS samples before treatment. Compared to Type-B, Type-A was characterized by a high proportion of Bacteroides, relatively high diversity, and severe functional damage. In the ITCM treatment group, we observed better clinical efficacy and positive alterations in microbial diversity and beneficial bacterial abundance, and the effect of approaching healthy people's gut microbiota, regardless of gut enterotypes identified in pretreatment. Furthermore, we detected several gut microbiota as potential therapeutic targets of ITCM treatment by analyzing the correlations between bacterial abundance alterations and functional outcomes, where Dorea with the strongest correlation was known to produce anti-inflammatory metabolite and negatively linked to trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a biomarker of AIS. This study analyzed clinical and gut microbial data and revealed the possibility of a broad application independent of the enterotypes, as well as the therapeutic targets of the ITCM in treating AIS patients with phlegm-heat syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: acute ischemic stroke; enterotype; gut microbiota; integrated traditional Chinese medicine; therapeutic efficacy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223549 PMCID: PMC8877419 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.827129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
The basic information of the ITCM treatment group and WM treatment group.
| ITCM group (n = 27) | WM group (n = 23) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n (%) | 15 (55.6%) | 15 (65.2%) | 0.569 |
| Age, year | 62.11 ± 15.32 | 56.22 ± 8.73 | 0.102 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.31 + 3.28 | 25.72 ± 4.44 | 0.953 |
| Smoke, n (%) | 12 | 10 | 1 |
| Drinking, n (%) | 9 | 7 | 0.303 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 18 (66.7%) | 17 (73.9%) | 0.758 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 7 (25.9%) | 8 (34.9%) | 0.548 |
| Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 5 (18.5%) | 4 (17.4%) | 1 |
| Stomach, n (%) | 6 (22.2%) | 4 (17.4%) | 0.736 |
| Folic acid, ng/mL | 7.25 ± 2.57 | 9.869 ± 5.355 | 0.097 |
| VitB12, pg/mL | 375.63 ± 294.52 | 413.667 ± 253.991 | 0.383 |
| HCY, μmol/L | 15.98 ± 10.29 | 16.3 ± 9.926 | 0.778 |
| HbA1C, % | 5.85 ± 1.17 | 6.41 ± 1.93 | 0.572 |
| GLU, mmol/L | 5.86 ± 1.2 | 6.37 ± 2.37 | 0.984 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.57 ± 0.67 | 1.66 ± 0.87 | 0.8 |
| TCH, mmol/L | 4.02 ± 0.87 | 4.12 ± 0.8 | 0.69 |
| HD, mmol/L | 1.06 ± 0.19 | 1.06 ± 0.23 | 0.778 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.47 ± 0.9 | 2.51 ± 0.68 | 0.884 |
| CRP, mg/l | 8.55 ± 7.98 | 17.461 ± 46.374 | 0.085 |
| Cr, μmol/L | 68.74 ± 19.79 | 62.74 ± 16.11 | 0.35 |
| BUN, mmol/L | 296.26 ± 94.5 | 302.78 ± 65.99 | 0.748 |
| UA, μmol/L | 4.82 ± 1.58 | 4.38 ± 1.26 | 0.34 |
| AST, IU/L | 23.19 ± 6.87 | 23.91 ± 9.77 | 0.853 |
| ALT, IU/L | 23.41 ± 17.53 | 23.22 ± 16.31 | 0.552 |
| Fib, g/l | 3.62 ± 0.98 | 3.57 ± 1.505 | 0.567 |
| D-Dimer, μg/ml | 0.75 ± 0.94 | 1.161 ± 2.366 | 0.651 |
| TBA, μmol/L | 4.45 ± 3.76 | 3.73 ± 3.41 | 0.34 |
Comparison in ITCM group for pretreatment and posttreatment.
| Treatment | Pretreatment | Posttreatment | Reduction |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITCM | NIHSS | 4.33 ± 2.77 | 2.22 ± 2.03 | 2.11 ± 1.76 | 0.000*** |
| Fire-heat score | 18.59 ± 5.06 | 8.89 ± 4.01 | 9.7 ± 2.35 | 0.000*** | |
| mRS ≤ 2, n (%) | 5 | 22 | – | 0.000*** | |
| BI ≥ 85, n (%) | 3 | 13 | – | 0.006** | |
| WM | NIHSS | 2.7 ± 2.48 | 1.91 ± 2.21 | 0.78 ± 0.85 | 0.001*** |
| Fire-heat score | 16.91 ± 6.13 | 13.78 ± 5.71 | 3.13 ± 1.89 | 0.000*** | |
| mRS ≤ 2, n (%) | 13 | 18 | – | 0.208 | |
| BI ≥ 85, n (%) | 6 | 12 | – | 0.13 |
**p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 1Characterization of gut enterotypes in AIS samples. (A) PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distances at ASV level showed different taxonomic compositions between the two enterotypes. (B) Microbiota communities on the genus level. The samples in the left and right bar plots were ordered by the abundance of Bacteroides and Prevotella, respectively. (C) The abundance of Bacteroides in the two enterotypes. (D) Microbial diversity (Shannon index) of the two enterotypes. (E) mRs scores of the two enterotypes. The colors of bars represented the enterotypes. Red, Wm treatment; Blue, ITCM treatment. *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 2The outcomes of AIS patients with different gut enterotypes and different treatments. (A–D) Clinical outcome of AIS patients with different gut enterotypes and different treatments. (E) Increase of microbial diversity (Shannon index) of AIS samples with different gut enterotypes and different treatments. (F–L) Increase of genus abundance in AIS samples with different gut enterotypes and different treatments. The colors of bars represented the treatment types. Red, Wm treatment; blue, ITCM treatment. NIHSS-, the decrease of NIHSS score; mRs-, the decrease of mRs score; BI+, the increase of BI score; fire-heat score-, the decrease of fire-heat score. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3Genera changed differentially in the two treatment groups and correlations between the change of genus and clinical outcome. The first two columns represented the abundance changes of genera which were differentially altered in the two treatment groups. The third column represented the significance of abundance changes in the between-group comparison (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05). The last two columns represented the correlations between the change of genus and clinical outcome, where the clinical outcomes were evaluated by the decrease of NIHSS score or the fire-heat score *p ≤ 0.05; +, positive correlation; -, negative correlation.