Literature DB >> 35223437

Time-kill kinetics and antimicrobial activities of Thai medical plant extracts against fish pathogenic bacteria.

Surachai Techaoei1.   

Abstract

The main objective of this work was to conduct the microbial control of Thai herbs against fish pathogens and their time-kill kinetics activity. Ten medicinal plants were selected to test antimicrobial activity against aquatic pathogens including Aeromonas hydrophila, Flavobacterium sp., and Streptomyces sp. Caesalpinia sappan and Alpinia galangal extracts showed the best activity against A. hydrophila and Streptomyces sp. Among them, Caesalpinia sappan expressed the great activity against A. hydrophila and Streptomyces sp. with the test concentration of MIC values of 1.25 and 2.50 mg/mL and MBC values of 5.0 and 10.0 mg/mL, while the MIC and MBC values of A. galangal were found to be 2.50 and 10.0 mg/mL with Streptomyces sp. The plant extracts of C. sappan and A. galangal at 1MIC, 2MIC, and 3MIC values really showed time-kill kinetics potential against fish pathogen on period of 3-18 h. In conclusion, plant extracts are good potentials sources as antifish pathogens and safety in an aquatic ecosystem. Copyright:
© 2022 Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial activity; fish pathogens; medicinal plants; time-kill kinetics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35223437      PMCID: PMC8820347          DOI: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_241_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res        ISSN: 0976-2094


INTRODUCTION

Aquaculture is also a natural source for food industry. An increasing of aquaculture production for food supply forces the fish workers to push up fish communities and densities. Therefore, the increase of fish population leading to water quality, lack of sanitary management of aquaculture, and immune suppression that open out to disease infections such as viral and bacterial infections.[12] Bacteria is an important fish pathogen causing mortality and productivity, economic losses in aquaculture.[3] Aeromonas hydrophila is the major bacterial pathogen which found in freshwater[4] and associated with skin infection,[56] bacteremia, enteritis,[7] respiratory tract failure, and dysentery.[8] Flavobacterium columnare is found in freshwater and soil. It is very dangerous to fish baby that appearing skin problem as well as increasing mortality and related with poor environmental condition.[910] Streptomyces sp. is a family of actinomycetes, nonpathogenic bacteria and produce desiccation-resistant spores. Previously, actinomycetes have also shown interesting role in dealing with the fish bacterial diseases.[11] Currently, the standard treatments for bacterial infection are antibiotics, vaccines, and chemical treatments. However, these treatments have limitation for the use, side effect, low efficacy, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.[12] Therefore, different plant extracts can be potential alternative therapeutics to control fish pathogens. Plant extracts have alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, and phenolic compounds.[1314] Previous researches showed that bioactive compounds have antimicrobial.[15] In our study, we investigate the antimicrobial activity of plant extracts including Galangal (Alpinia galanga (L) Willd); AG, ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe; ZO), sappan (Caesalpinia sappan L.; CS), clove basil (Ocimum gratissimum; OG), red basil (Ocimum sanctum L.; OS), cassod tree (Senna siamea (Lam) Irwin and Barneby; SS), ringworm bush (Cassia alata (L) Roxb; CA), coriander root (Coriandrum sativum L.; CSA), garlic chives (Allium tuberosum Rottl. ex Spreng; AT), and cinnamon tree (Cinnamomum verum J. Presl.; CV) against A. hydrophila, Flavobacterium sp. and Streptomyces sp. and study the time-kinetics studies of herbal extracts at different times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of herbal plants

Ten plant samples (two rhizomes of ZO and AG, leaves of OG, SS, CA, and CSA, two stems of OS and AT, one core of CS, and one bark of CV) were collected from Pathum Thani province in May 2020 and identify the named by plant taxonomist (Miss Kunthasaya Akkarasiritharattana). All plants were taken in sterile container and transported to the laboratory, washed with running tap, and dried at 60°C for 1 day. Dried plants were ground and kept in sterile bottles under 4°C.

Extraction

The plant powders were extracted with 95% ethanol (1:20, w/v). The solution was shaken for 2 days at room temperature and filtered with filter paper (Whatman No. 1). All extraction were vaporized at 50°C, weighted, calculated, and stored at 4°C.

Antimicrobial activity

The antibacterial activity was examined by agar disc diffusion assay. Tested bacterial cultures including A. hydrophila, Favobacterium sp. and Streptomyces sp. were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards. Sterile discs were added with crude plant extracts (10 mg/mL) before applied over the agar plates which swabbed with tested bacteria. After incubation at 37°C for 1 day, the clear zone was observed. Gentamycin (10 μg/disc) and DMSO at 5% were used as control, respectively. The experiment was conducted in triplicates.[16]

Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity

The bacteriostatic (MIC) of the plant extracts was examined by varying the concentrations between 0.1 and 10.0 mg/mL. For MIC, assay was performed in 96-well dilution method. Eighty milliliters of plant extracts with each concentration were added into each well that containing 100 μL of NB. After that, 20 μL of bacterial suspension (1.5 × 108 cfu/mL) was transferred into a 96-well plate. After incubation, the smallest concentration of plant extracts that inhibited the bacterial growth was evaluated by observing–measuring turbidity, called MIC values. To evaluate the MBC, the wells which did not present any visible growth (clear solution) were collected from each well using an inoculation loop and resubculture on NA. After incubation, the smallest concentration that no visible bacterial growth was noted as the MBC values. The assays were done in triplicate.[17]

Time-kill kinetic analysis

Time-kill kinetics assay was analyzed using the MIC values, which evaluated before the experiment. The test strain in late logarithmic growth phase was diluted the bacterial concentration in a serial ten-fold dilutions ranging of 10−3 and 10−4 from 1.5 × 108 cfu/mL. Eighty microliters of the extract at 1xMIC, 2xMIC, and 3xMIC was put into each well that containing 100 μL of NB supplemented with 20 μL of each diluted bacterial cells suspension and incubated at 37°C. Hundred milliliters of aliquot were taken from the mixture solution at 3, 6, 9, and 18 h and spread onto NA and then incubated at the same condition. The colonies were counted and compared with control in terms of cfu/mL.[18]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Yield extracts

The yield of plant extracts is demonstrated in Table 1. Data indicated that the yield content of AT has the highest levels at 16.63% followed by CV was 12.73%, whereas the crude extract of CA could only extract of 1.53% [Table 1]. An experimental is manage to obtain crude extracts with high product and lower change to the characteristics of crude plant extracts.[19] Some scientist documented that the influence of different plants and the type of residue on extraction yield were more essential than the solvent system on extraction yield.[20] Therefore, the selection of suitable extraction technique and solvent was considered.[2122]
Table 1

The inhibition zone of plant extracts against fish pathogens

Plant extractsOriginFamily% YieldInhibition zone (mm)

AHaSTbFBc
AGRhizomeZingiberaceae7.00NZf13.83±0.76NZ
CSCoreLeguminosae2.7714.50±0.5012.50±0.87NZ
CCLeaf Labiatae6.03NZNZNZ
OTWhole Labiatae1.40NZNZNZ
SSLeaf Leguminosae6.45NZNZNZ
CALeaf Caesalpinoideae1.53NZNZNZ
CSARootApiaceae3.60NZNZNZ
ASWhole Apiaceae16.63NZNZNZ
CVBark Lauraceae12.73NZNZNZ
ZORhizomeZingiberaceae6.50NZNZNZ
+ve.d14±0.0013±0.0013±0.00
-veeNZNZNZ

aA. hydrophila, bStreptomyces sp., cFlavobacterium sp., dgentamycin (10 µg/disc), eDMSO (5%), fno inhibition zone

The inhibition zone of plant extracts against fish pathogens aA. hydrophila, bStreptomyces sp., cFlavobacterium sp., dgentamycin (10 µg/disc), eDMSO (5%), fno inhibition zone

Antibacterial activity

The CS extracts (10 mg/mL) showed the most effective in reducing the growth of A. hydrophila and Streptomyces sp. with the zone of inhibition of 14.5 ± 0.50 and 12.5 ± 0.87 mm, while the rhizome extracts of AG were potent antimicrobial activity against Streptomyces sp. with the clearing zones of 13.83 ± 0.76 mm [Table 1 and Figure 1]. Several studies have demonstrated that CS has potential against broad bacterial strains as well as fungal pathogens (Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger).[2324] Moreover, the A. galanga extracts have been showed against bacterial pathogens such as gastrointestinal tract pathogens, respiratory tract pathogens, and skin pathogens.[25]
Figure 1

The inhibition zone of plant extracts against fish pathogens. (a) aCS extracts and ccinnamon extracts against A. hydrophila, (b) eCS extracts and fCC extracts against Streptomyces sp., (c) gAG extracts and hCC extracts against Streptomyces sp. bgentamycin, d5%DMSO

The inhibition zone of plant extracts against fish pathogens. (a) aCS extracts and ccinnamon extracts against A. hydrophila, (b) eCS extracts and fCC extracts against Streptomyces sp., (c) gAG extracts and hCC extracts against Streptomyces sp. bgentamycin, d5%DMSO Previous results, the ethanolic extracts of CS demonstrated the antibacterial activity against A. hydrophila and Streptomyces sp., whereas the AG extracts had potent inhibitory effect against Streptomyces only. Therefore, this experiment was aimed to investigate MIC and MBC of both extracts (CS and AG) against A. hydrophila and Streptomyces sp. Results displayed that the CS extracts exhibited antibacterial activity against A. hydrophila and Streptomyces with the MIC and MBC values of 1.25 and 2.50 mg/mL, and also represented the concentration of 5.0 and 10.0 mg/mL (MBC values), while the concentration of AG extracts at 2.50 and 10.0 mg/mL showed MIC and MBC activity with Streptomyces sp. [Table 2]. This experiment similar with some reported because the ethanol and water extracts of CS had an inhibitory effect against bacterial pathogens.[26] In addition, Voravuthikunchai et al.[27] noted that the MBC values of AG extracts against S. aureus, in contrast with the present report showed that the MBC of AG extracts against Streptomyces sp. was 10 mg/mL. Accordingly, variation in MIC and MBC values of different plant extracts may arise from variation in their method of extraction, tested organisms, feed inoculum, growth condition, and culture media that was used and bioactive compounds that were found in plant extract.[2829]
Table 2

The Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of plant extracts against fish pathogens

Plant extracts (mg/ml)AHaSTb


MICMBCcMICMBC
CS1.255.002.5010.00
AG--2.5010.00

aA. hydrophila, bStreptomyces sp.

The Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of plant extracts against fish pathogens aA. hydrophila, bStreptomyces sp.

Time-killing kinetics

To evaluate time-killing activity, this assay was performed over a period of 18 h with both fish bacteria and crude extracts at the concentration of 1xMIC, 2xMIC, and 3xMIC, respectively. As a result, time-kill curve was plotted between the logarithmic number of cfu/mL and incubation time. At 3xMIC concentration, CS extracts greatly showed decrease in amount of viable A. hydrophila and Streptomyces sp. at 9–18 h. In addition, AG extracts at the concentration of 2xMIC and 3xMIC could inhibit the bacterial cell viability of Streptomyces sp. at 9–18 h when compared with the 1xMIC and the negative control, respectively [Figure 2]. From the time, killing analysis exposed the degree of time-dependent microbial inhibition that was different between bacteria and plant extracts.[2930] Accordingly, the ability of antibacterial properties may be considered by plant secondary metabolites and response to microbial infection.[31]
Figure 2

Time-kill kinetics of various concentration of plant extracts against fish pathogens. (a) AG: Streptomyces sp., (b) CS: Streptomyces sp., (c) CS: Aeromonas hydrophila

Time-kill kinetics of various concentration of plant extracts against fish pathogens. (a) AG: Streptomyces sp., (b) CS: Streptomyces sp., (c) CS: Aeromonas hydrophila

CONCLUSION

C. sappan and A. galangal seem to be the most promising medicinal plant for control fish pathogens disease. Therefore, further study is needed to test synergistic interaction between plant extracts and commercial agents as well as chemical properties and pharmacological activities.

Financial support and sponsorship

This project was supported by Faculty of Integrative Medicine, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies.

Authors:  R L Naylor; R J Goldburg; J H Primavera; N Kautsky; M C Beveridge; J Clay; C Folke; J Lubchenco; H Mooney; M Troell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment.

Authors:  Felipe C Cabello
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Characterization of extracellular proteins produced by Aeromonas hydrophila AH-1.

Authors:  Hong Bing Yu; Rasvinder Kaur; Simin Lim; Xian Hui Wang; Ka Yin Leung
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Kinetics and quantification of antibacterial effects of beta-lactams, macrolides, and quinolones against gram-positive and gram-negative RTI pathogens.

Authors:  K-J Schaper; S Schubert; A Dalhoff
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Isolation and characterization of strains of Flavobacterium columnare from Brazil.

Authors:  H C P Figueiredo; P H Klesius; C R Arias; J Evans; C A Shoemaker; D J Pereira; M T D Peixoto
Journal:  J Fish Dis       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.767

6.  Antibacterial activity of Alpinia galanga (L) Willd crude extracts.

Authors:  Kiranmayee Rao; Bhuvaneswari Ch; Lakshmi M Narasu; Archana Giri
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.926

Review 7.  [Structural and functional analysis of the serine protease from Aeromonas sobria].

Authors:  Hidetomo Kobayashi
Journal:  Yakugaku Zasshi       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.302

8.  Antibiotic resistance pattern of motile aeromonads from farm raised fresh water fish.

Authors:  Mohamed Hatha; A A Vivekanandhan; G Julie Joice
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Aeromonas hydrophila Sepsis Associated with Consumption of Raw Oysters.

Authors:  Ivan Nikiforov; John Goldman; Pramil Cheriyath; Anix Vyas; Vinod Nookala
Journal:  Case Rep Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-19

10.  The antibacterial activity of extracts of nine plant species with good activity against Escherichia coli against five other bacteria and cytotoxicity of extracts.

Authors:  Ishaku Leo Elisha; Francien S Botha; Lyndy Joy McGaw; Jacobus Nicolaas Eloff
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.