| Literature DB >> 35223351 |
Padmavati Sahare1, Paulina Govea Alvarez1, Juan Manual Sanchez Yanez2, Juan Gabriel Luna Bárcenas3, Samik Chakraborty4, Sujay Paul5, Miriam Estevez1.
Abstract
Significant advancement in the field of nanotechnology has raised the possibility of applying potent engineered biocompatible nanomaterials within biological systems for theranostic purposes. Titanium dioxide (titanium(IV) oxide/titania/TiO2) has garnered considerable attention as one of the most extensively studied metal oxides in clinical applications. Owing to the unique properties of titania, such as photocatalytic activity, excellent biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, and low toxicity, titania nanomaterials have revolutionized therapeutic approaches. Additionally, titania provides an exceptional choice for developing innovative medical devices and the integration of functional moieties that can modulate the biological responses. Thus, the current review aims to present a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of TiO2-based nanotherapeutics and the corresponding future challenges.Entities:
Keywords: clinical application; nanostructures; physicochemical; theranostics; titanium dioxide (TiO2)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223351 PMCID: PMC8848344 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.13.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1SEM images of titania structures. (A) Nanotubes. (Figure 1A was adapted with permission from [5], Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society. This content is not subject to CC BY 4.0.) (B) Nanobelts. (Figure 1B was adapted with permission from [6], Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society. This content is not subject to CC BY 4.0.) (C) Mesostructure (unpublished image) and (D) nanoflowers. (Figure 1D was adapted with permission from [7], Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. This content is not subject to CC BY 4.0.)
Summary of the biocompatible nature of various TiO2 nanomaterials.
| Nanomaterial | Synthesis method | Shape and size | Surface modification | Biocompatibility | Ref. |
|
|
|||||
| TiO2 nanocrystalline film as light-addressable electrode | sol–gel | mesoporous structure with pore diameters of 50–100 nm | poly-ᴅ-lysine | glia-neuron co-culture were grown fully within two weeks | [ |
| titania–chitosan nanocomposites | sol–gel | spherical and irregular morphology of 4.5–10.5 nm | — | hydroxyapatite (HAp) layer formation | [ |
| titania coating over stainless steel cardiovascular stents | sol–gel | — | — | growth and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells | [ |
| titania nanotubes (TNTs) | electrochemical anodization | 200 nm in diameter | octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT)/poly(lactic- |
OCT/PLGA-TNTs showed bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) viability and supported cell proliferation | [ |
| TiO2 nps | sol–gel | pore diameter 2.42 nm, aggregates of nanoparticles 300–400 nm | GABA, sulfate and phosphate ions | useful for intranasal administration and promote brain delivery of antiepileptic drugs to control seizures | [ |
| TiO2 nps | — | mean size of ca. 15 nm | co-doped with Fe and N | human dermal fibroblasts retain their specific elongated morphology and established numerous focal adhesions | [ |
| nanocomposite of TNTs with silver (TNT/Ag) | chemical vapor deposition | tube diameter 30–45 nm | enriched with silver nanograins | biocompatible with L929 fibroblasts | [ |
| porous TNTs | anodic oxidation | diameter 300–500 nm, wall thickness 150–300 nm | — | high biocompatibility with L929 murine fibroblasts and photocatalytic activity | [ |
| TiO2 was used as coating | physical vapor deposition | 30.5 nm titania shell thickness | — | increased penetrability of titania-coated nanoparticles through the elastic lamina | [ |
| nanocomposite of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA | atomic layer deposition | diameter of TNT 18–140 nm | hydroxyapatite | proliferation of L929 fibroblasts | [ |
| mesoporous TiO2 nanobricks (MTNs) | simple mixing | diamond shape, 220 ± 10 nm in width, 250 ± 10 nm in length and ca. 40 nm in thickness; pore size of ca. 4.1 nm | PEG | good biocompatibility with no apparent changes in morphology in hematoxylin and eosin | [ |
| reduced graphene/TiO2 composites | — | — | — | stromal fibroblast attachment showed commendable compatibility of the sintered nanocomposite | [ |
| TNTs loaded with tetracycline (TC) nanoparticles | electrochemical anodization | diameter 100 nm | PLGA-coated TC particles | osteogenic differentiation of mouse pre-osteoblasts and significant antimicrobial activity without cytotoxicity | [ |
| TiO2 nps | sol–gel and microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis | 1–13 nm | Ag/Fe | amniotic fluid stem cells are viable, with an active metabolism and are well attached to the substrate | [ |
| TiO2@AuNPs | microfluidic process | diameters of 232 ± 109 nm | — | TiO2@AuNPs were found to be highly biocompatible for human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Their viability was not affected even at higher concentrations of TiO2@AuNPs nanocomposite. | [ |
| Fe–TiO2 nanosystem | solvothermal method and thermal decomposition | nanorod width 10 and length 30 nm | — | high ratio of viable cells for both 2D breast cancer 4T1 cells and 3D intestine organoids | [ |
Figure 2SEM images of (a) annealed Ti, (b) PCL, (c) PCL with 2 wt % TiO2, (d) PCL with 5 wt % TiO2, and (e) PCL with 7 wt % TiO2 after immersing in simulated body fluid for 21 days. (f) Viability of hFOB cells on the five corresponding samples cultured on day 1 and day 3 (p < 0.05) (Figure 2 was adapted from [60] (© 2018 A. S. K. Kiran et al., published by MDPI, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
Figure 3SEM images of the bacterial colonization on (a) coated SS-TiO2, (b) micropatterned SS-TiO2, (c) polished SS, and (d) unexposed polished SS. The scale is 5 µm. Inserts show interaction at 2000×. The scale in the inserts is 10 µm. (e) Viable adhered bacteria on coated SS-TiO2 and SS-TiO2 micropatterned with different TiO2 concentrations after exposure to UV light. The percentages indicate the decrease of viable adhered bacteria due to UV exposure. All samples without UV are statistically significantly different. *Statistically significant difference compared to all other conditions (Figure 3a–e was adapted from [96] (© 2018 S. Arango-Santander et al., published by Springer Nature, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
Figure 4Illustration of the drug release profile of nanomaterials: sustained release and stimuli-responsive release.
Figure 5Cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin and DOX-TiO2 nanocomposites against human SMMC-7721 hepatocarcinoma cells. Note: data expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin and DOX-TiO2 nanocomposites against human SMMC-7721 hepatocarcinoma cells. Note: data expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). (Figure 5 was adapted from [108] “Anticancer efficacy enhancement and attenuation of side effects of doxorubicin with titanium dioxide nanoparticles”, © 2011 Y. Chen et al., published by Dove Medical Press Ltd., distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial (unported, v3.0) License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). This content is not subject to CC BY 4.0.
Figure 6Illustration of ROS generation by TiO2 nanomaterials by photosensitization and sonosensitization techniques. (Figure 6 was adapted from [110] (© 2018 J. Bogdan et al., published by Springer Open, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
Figure 7(a) Schematic illustration of synergistic SDT and PTT assisted by B-TiO2−-PEG for tumor eradication. (b) Schematic of the fabrication of B-TiO2− by aluminum reduction. (c) Relative cell viability of 4T1 cells after different treatments, including control (without treatment), B-TiO2−-PEG only, laser only, US irradiation only, B-TiO2−-PEG combined with laser irradiation, B-TiO2−-PEG combined with US irradiation, and B-TiO2−-PEG combined with laser/US co-irradiation (*** denotes P < 0.001). (Figure 7 was adapted from [115], Copyright 2011 ACS Publications. This content is not subject to CC BY 4.0).
Figure 8(a) Schematic representation of the preparation and surface modification of green titania (G-TiO2−) (section A) for (c) mitochondrial-targeted cancer phototherapy. First, black titania (B-TiO2−) was synthesized from P25 (pristine titania) through an aluminum reduction method. Then G-TiO2− was prepared from B-TiO2− by strong ultrasonication. Triphenylphosphonium (TPP) was conjugated to G-TiO2− (G-TiO2-x-TPP) for mitochondria targeting. Under near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation, G-TiO2− was able to simultaneously generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hyperthermia for photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT), respectively. (b) In vitro cell viabilities (mean ± SD) of HeLa cells incubated with G-TiO2− at different Ti concentrations for 24 h without (black bars) and under NIR laser irradiation for 5 min (red bars, 980 nm, 0.72 W·cm−2). (d) Tumor growth curves of different groups of tumor-bearing mice. The inset shows a photograph of cancer phototherapy (Figure 8 was adapted from [116] (© 2017 Ivyspring International Publisher, published by Ivyspring International Publisher, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). This content is not subject to CC BY 4.0.