| Literature DB >> 35223204 |
Misganaw Meragiaw1, Zerihun Woldu1, Bal Ram Singh2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Investigating the land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics and the status of traditional agroforestry practices provide important data for policymakers. The main objective of this study was to assess the LULC dynamics and traditional agroforestry practices among smallholder farmers across the two agro-ecological zones in Wonchi District of Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Agroforestry; Crop species; LULC change; Multipurpose species; Supervised classification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223204 PMCID: PMC8877395 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Map of Ethiopia showing the study area and selected sites in the two agro-ecological zones.
The shape file data for the location map of the study area were obtained from the Ethiopian Mapping Agency (https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles), which is free and open to researchers.
Details of acquired satellite image in the study area.
| Landsat type &ID | Acquisition date | Spatial resolution | Spectral bands | Path/raw | Sensor | Sun elevation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landsat 5 | 09-11-1985 | 30 m | 7 | 169/054 | TM | 51.21971477 |
| Landsat 7 | 28-10-2001 | 30 m | 7 | 169/054 | ETM+ | 57.23935453 |
| Landsat 8 | 07-01-2019 | 30 m | 11 | 169/054 | OLI | 49.07093407 |
Notes.
Thematic Mapper
Enhanced Thematic Mapper
Operational Land Imager
Crop diversity in the two agro-ecological zones of Wonchi District.
| Oilseed, cereal, and legume crops | Vegetables and spices | Tree crops | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Family | Species | Family | Species | Family |
| Poaceae |
|
| Rosaceae | ||
| Musaceae |
|
| Moraceae | ||
| Poaceae |
|
| Rosaceae | ||
| Poaceae |
| Celastraceae | |||
| Fabaceae |
| Rutaceae | |||
| Fabaceae |
| Rubiaceae | |||
| Fabaceae |
| Rutaceae | |||
| Fabaceae |
| Lauraceae | |||
| Poaceae |
| Musaceae | |||
| Linaceae |
| Anacardiaceae | |||
| Poaceae |
| Myrtaceae | |||
| Poaceae |
| Rutaceae | |||
| Fabaceae |
| Rhamnaceae | |||
| Asteraceae | Caricaceae | ||||
Notes.
Species that are reported only in the midland agro-ecological zone.
Results of direct matrix ranking of agroforestry multipurpose woody species.
| Plant species | Main use category | Total | Rank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil fertility | Wild edible | Construction & farm tools | Charcoal & fire wood | Shade & Fence | |||
|
| 2 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 6 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 21 | 1 |
|
| 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 3 |
|
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 3 |
|
| 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 4 |
|
| 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 2 |
| 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 5 | |
Use values of the most important multipurpose tree species with more than two use categories.
| Name of species | Use category | No. of informants | Use citations | Use value | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 36 | 180 | 1.8 | 5 |
|
| 6 | 36 | 216 | 2.2 | 4 |
|
| 5 | 43 | 215 | 2.2 | 4 |
|
| 3 | 20 | 60 | 0.6 | 10 |
|
| 3 | 27 | 81 | 0.8 | 8 |
|
| 3 | 24 | 72 | 0.7 | 9 |
|
| 5 | 48 | 240 | 2.4 | 3 |
|
| 5 | 48 | 240 | 2.4 | 3 |
|
| 5 | 20 | 100 | 1.0 | 7 |
|
| 5 | 35 | 175 | 1.8 | 5 |
| 7 | 43 | 301 | 3.0 | 2 | |
|
| 4 | 28 | 112 | 1.1 | 6 |
|
| 5 | 20 | 100 | 1.0 | 7 |
| 5 | 20 | 100 | 1.0 | 7 | |
|
| 6 | 65 | 390 | 3.9 | 1 |
Error matrices resulting from classifying test pixels for the classified images of 1985 (a), 2001 (b), and 2019 (c).
The producer value represents the reference data whereas the user value represents the classification generated from the remotely sensed data. Bolded diagonal numbers represent correctly classified sites according to reference data, whereas off-diagonals represent misclassified values concerning reference data.
| 1985(a) | Agroforestry cover | Cropland | Forest cover | Settlement and roads | Shrub Cover | Water body | User value | User’s accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agroforestry Cover |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 44 | 95.5 |
| Cropland | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 48 | 95.8 |
| Forest Cover | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 100 |
| Settlement and roads | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 49 | 95.9 |
| Shrub Cover | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 33 | 93.9 |
| Water body | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 100 |
| Producer value | 44 | 47 | 42 | 47 | 34 | 14 | 228 | |
| Producer’s accuracy (%) | 95.5% | 97.9 | 100 | 100 | 91.2 | 85.7 | ||
| Overall Accuracy (%) | 96.5 | |||||||
| Kappa statistic | 96% | |||||||
| 2001 (b) | ||||||||
| Agroforestry Cover |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 94.7 |
| Cropland | 2 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 92.0 |
| Forest Cover | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 6 | 0 | 50 | 88.0 |
| Settlement and roads | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 27 | 92.6 |
| Shrub Cover | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 0 | 46 | 95.7 |
| Water body | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 88.0 |
| Producer value | 20 | 53 | 45 | 26 | 51 | 22 | 217 | |
| Producer’s accuracy (%) | 90.0 | 86.8 | 97.8 | 96.2 | 86.3 | 100 | ||
| Overall Accuracy (%) | 91.7 | |||||||
| Kappa statistic | 90.0% | |||||||
| 2019(c) | ||||||||
| Agroforestry Cover |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 68 | 91.2 |
| Cropland | 2 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 72 | 94.4 |
| Forest Cover | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 100 |
| Settlement and roads | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 110 | 90.9 |
| Shrub Cover | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 0 | 52 | 94.2 |
| Water body | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 100 |
| Producer value | 64 | 80 | 28 | 100 | 52 | 19 | 343 | |
| Producer’s accuracy (%) | 96.9 | 85 | 78.6 | 100 | 94.2 | 100 | ||
| Overall Accuracy (%) | 93.3 | |||||||
| Kappa statistic | 92.0% |
Figure 2Satellite imageries of 1985, 2001, and 2019 with six LULC classes in Wonchi District.
Summary of area change in percentage for six classes of LULC categories.
| LULC Class | 1985–2001 | 2001–2019 | 1985–2019 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (ha) | Area (%) | Area (ha) | Area (%) | Area (ha) | Area (%) | |
| Agroforestry cover | 115.64 | 0.3 | 1635.97 | 3.5 | 1751.61 | 3.8 |
| Cropland | −1445.25 | −3.1 | −5064.96 | −10.8 | −6510.21 | −13.9 |
| Forest cover | −365.61 | −0.8 | −3153.41 | −6.8 | −3519.03 | −7.5 |
| Settlement and road | −531.62 | −1.1 | 9453.07 | 20.2 | 8921.46 | 19.1 |
| Shrub cover | 2287.26 | 4.9 | −2800.96 | −6.0 | −513.70 | −1.1 |
| Water body | −60.41 | −0.1 | −69.71 | −0.2 | −130.12 | −0.3 |
Figure 3Total trends of LULC types of area change in percentage for six LULC classes in three time-series of the study area.
ARC = Annual rate of change; the bar graphs above zero show positive values and suggest an increase, and those below zero indicate negative values and a decrease in the area of LULC type.