| Literature DB >> 35222902 |
Xia Guo1, Bingjie Cheng2.
Abstract
Stroke is assumed as one of the common cerebrovascular diseases that endangers human health and life. Its incidence and mortality rates are high, while survivors (50% to 70%) suffer from different degrees of disability. Hemiplegia is a common disability after stroke, mainly manifested as muscle weakness of the affected side, limb spasm, and limited activity, which severely impacts a patient's daily life. There are various rehabilitation methods for stroke hemiplegia, including modern rehabilitation medicine, motor therapy, acupuncture, and rehabilitation robot. The cost and effect of different rehabilitation methods are not the same. It is the focus to find an economical and effective rehabilitation method. In this paper, 128 stroke patients aged 41 to 73 hospitalized between January 2019 and January 2021 were analyzed. The intervention group used standard physical therapy and traditional acupuncture therapy, and the control group only used standard physical therapy. We used RStudio 1.1.419 (RStudio Corporation) for analysis. Experimental results show that the short-term efficacy of the intervention group is better than that of the control group. The intervention group was better than the control group in recovery from injury during rehabilitation, degree of muscle spasm, self-care ability in daily life, and overall degree of damage. In the long-term efficacy analysis, we can see that with the increase in the number of acupuncture, the efficacy of the intervention group is still better than that of the control group. Compared with physical rehabilitation alone, acupuncture has better short-term, and long-term clinical effects for stroke patients improves motor dysfunction and improves the quality of life and independence of stroke patients. With the increase in the number of acupuncture treatments, the patient's rehabilitation effect will be better.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222902 PMCID: PMC8872684 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9962421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Baseline demographic of two groups.
| Variable | Intervention ( | Control ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 63.25 ± 12.32 | 64.19 ± 11.21 | −0.45 | 0.65 |
| Gender (male/female) | 44/21 | 43/20 | 0 | 1 |
| BMI | 25.52 ± 3.12 | 25.51 ± 3.62 | 0.02 | 0.99 |
| Onset duration (d) | 36.5 ± 35.8 | 32.7 ± 37.8 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| Hypertension | 56 | 54 | 0 | 1 |
| Intervention period (d) | 20.5 ± 7.8 | 18.1 ± 8.4 | 1.68 | 0.09 |
Clinical effects after treatment in two groups.
| Variable | Intervention ( | Control ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.effective | 59 | 45 | 6.64 | <0.01 |
| Fugl–Meyer scale | 66.24 ± 11.85 | 52.52 ± 9.58 | 7.19 | <0.01 |
| Modified Ashworth scale | 2.02 ± 0.48 | 3.25 ± 1.25 | 7.31 | <0.01 |
| Barthel index | 82.25 ± 11.25 | 69.54 ± 8.65 | 6.15 | <0.01 |
| NIH stroke scale | 7.24 ± 5.85 | 9.52 ± 6.51 | −2.09 | 0.04 |
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier curves of two groups comprised those for whom acupuncture was initiated within 3 months of stroke onset.