| Literature DB >> 35222901 |
Huiliao He1, Ruixing Liu1, Xiuping Zhou1, Yinhong Zhang1, Beibei Yu1, Zhihua Xu1, Hu Huang1.
Abstract
Abdominal B-ultrasound images of intrauterine pregnancy tissue residues were analyzed to discuss their diagnostic value. With the rapid development of computer technology and medical imaging technology, doctors are also faced with more and more medical image diagnosis tasks, and computer-aided diagnosis systems are especially important in order to reduce the work pressure of doctors. In recent years, deep learning has made rapid development and achieved great breakthroughs in various fields. In medical-aided diagnostic systems, deep learning has greatly improved the diagnostic efficiency, but there are no mature research results for abdominal B-ultrasound image recognition of intrauterine pregnancy tissue residues. Therefore, the study of liver ultrasound image classification based on deep learning has important practical application value. In this paper, we propose to give a CNN model optimization method based on grid search. Compared with the conventional CNN model design, this method saves time and effort by eliminating the need to manually adjust parameters based on experience and has an accuracy of more than 92% in classifying abdominal B-ultrasound images of intrauterine pregnancy tissue residues. The diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy tissue residues by abdominal B-ultrasound can effectively improve the diagnosis and provide important reference for patients to receive treatment, which has high diagnostic value.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222901 PMCID: PMC8866017 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9937051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Main model.
Figure 2Model scaling; (a) baseline model; (b) composite scaling based on baseline model.
Figure 3CNN model structure optimization methods in different dimensions; (a) model width scaling; (b) model depth scaling; (c) input image size scaling.
Figure 4Scaling based on the depth (d) of the baseline CNN model.
Figure 5Scaling based on the width (w) of the baseline CNN model.
Figure 6Different image (R) sizes based on the input of the baseline CNN model.
Figure 7Composite scaling based on baseline CNN model with different scaling parameters.
Classification results of different methods.
| CNN model | Flops (million) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline CNN model | 2.4 | 85.9 |
| Only expand the depth of CNN | 18.2 | 87.6 |
| Only expand the width of CNN | 18.3 | 87.3 |
| Compound amplification | 17.9 | 90.5 |
Figure 8Visualization of abdominal B-ultrasound images with composite scaling of other methods.
Figure 9Amplification factor vs. Flops and accuracy line graph.
Specific parameters of the scaled-up series of models.
| Model | Amplification factor ( | Depth (d) | Width (W) | Image size (c) | Flops (million) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNN01 | 1.5 | 4 | 81 | 28 | 4.7 |
| CNN02 | 2 | 4 | 108 | 35 | 6.8 |
| CNN03 | 2.3 | 5 | 124 | 35 | 14.6 |
| CNN04 | 3.7 | 6 | 200 | 40 | 17.8 |
| CNN05 | 4.1 | 6 | 221 | 40 | 24.9 |