Literature DB >> 35222828

Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Geographic Residency Placement Relative to Medical School Location.

Cody E Cotner1, Sophia F Mercadante2, Judy A Shea3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2020-2021 residency application cycle was altered to reduce COVID-19 transmission, with moves to all virtual interviews and no away rotations for medical students. These changes may have affected how students ranked residency programs, such as choosing programs near their medical schools.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a larger percentage of medical students matched to residency programs in the same state as their medical schools in 2021 vs 2018-2020.
METHODS: We searched the webpages or emailed student affairs deans of the 155 Liaison Committee on Medical Education accredited MD programs to attain medical school match lists. Differences in the percentage of students matching to residency programs in the same US state as their medical schools in 2021 vs 2018-2020 were compared using chi-square tests.
RESULTS: We recorded 36 021 of 79 406 (45%) National Resident Matching Program, 759 of 1720 (44%) ophthalmology, and 586 urology MD residency matches between 2018 and 2021. The percentage of students matching to residency programs in the same state as their medical schools was 35.9% in 2021 versus 34.3% in 2018-2020 (P=.005). Students were more likely to match to programs in the same state as their medical schools in 2021 if they attended a public medical school (40.3% vs 38.5%, P=.009) or applied into specialties where ≥50% of students traditionally perform away rotations (32.2% vs 30.2%, P=.031).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a small difference in the percentage of medical students matching to residency programs in the same state as their medical schools in 2021 vs 2018-2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35222828      PMCID: PMC8848873          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00614.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  7 in total

1.  The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Christopher K Meilchen; Jaden R Kohn; Taylor P Kohn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The Price of Fear: An Ethical Dilemma Underscored in a Virtual Residency Interview Season.

Authors:  Brian Antono; Joel Willis; Robert L Phillips; Andrew Bazemore; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Do audition electives impact match success?

Authors:  Elizabeth Higgins; Linnie Newman; Katherine Halligan; Margaret Miller; Sally Schwab; Lynn Kosowicz
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-06-13

4.  Planning virtual residency interviews as a result of COVID-19: insight from residency applicants and physicians conducting interviews.

Authors:  Jacob Shreffler; Melissa Platt; Selena Thé; Martin Huecker
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Paul A Asadourian; Alexander I Murphy; Andrew A Marano; Christine H Rohde; June K Wu
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Applicant Preferences for Virtual Interviews: Insights from the 2020-21 Integrated Plastic Surgery Application Cycle.

Authors:  Kshipra Hemal; Benjamin A Sarac; Carter J Boyd; Christopher M Runyan; Amanda A Gosman; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-29
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Association Between Virtual Interviewing and Geographical Distribution of Matched Residency Programs for General Surgery Applicants.

Authors:  Hassan Beesley; Luise Pernar; Yousif Kettoola; Donald Hess
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.524

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.