Literature DB >> 35222697

Pediatric esophageal stenoses: Challenges and new surgical device promoting tension-free esophageal anastomosis.

Dan Alexandru Iozsa1,2, Radu-Iulian Spătaru1,2, Luminita Florentina Tomescu3, Ovidiu Stiru4,5, Florentina Gherghiceanu6, Florentina Furtunescu7, Daniel Radavoi8,9, Nicolae Bacalbasa10,11, Irina Balescu12, Adrian Tulin13,14.   

Abstract

Esophageal stenoses of childhood have a broad spectrum of underlying causes. Their treatment is usually minimally invasive by endoscopic means, but sometimes surgery is necessary in refractory cases. Techniques employed in the surgical treatment of esophageal strictures include resection of the stenotic esophageal segment or esophageal substitution procedures. Esophageal anastomosis has always been a challenge in pediatric surgery. Anastomosis complications are linked to anatomical, biological and technical aspects. Mechanical tension between esophageal ends is an important cause of complications including anastomotic leaks or dehiscence. Eleven cases of esophageal stenoses, surgically treated in the Pediatric Surgery Department of Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children 'Marie S. Curie' by a single team in 5 years, were included in the present study. The results showed that, the main causes of esophageal stenosis were represented by corrosive esophageal injury in five cases, complications of esophageal atresia repair in three cases, congenital esophageal stenosis in two cases and chemotherapy-induced esophageal necrosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment in one case. The authors also designed and presented a device facilitating esophageal anastomosis under tension. Its principle involved temporary absorption of tension at secure points of the two esophageal pouches and reallocating it in equal amounts following anastomosis while decreasing any stretch-related tissue trauma. In conclusion, this auxiliary tool is beneficial for esophageal anastomosis; however, the standard steps of the esophageal anastomosis procedure should still be considered when necessary.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomosis device; dilatation; esophageal stenosis; leakage; stricture

Year:  2022        PMID: 35222697      PMCID: PMC8812146          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  27 in total

1.  Anastomotic leakage following surgery for esophageal atresia.

Authors:  S Chittmittrapap; L Spitz; E M Kiely; R J Brereton
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Foregut duplication cyst associated with esophageal atresia-one-stage neonatal surgical repair.

Authors:  R I Spataru; M C Popoiu; M Ivanov
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Anastomotic technic in esophageal atresia.

Authors:  D T Cloud
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Major anastomotic dehiscence after repair of esophageal atresia: conservative management or reoperation?

Authors:  C D'Urzo; V Buonuomo; G Rando; C Pintus
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Preputial calculus in a neurologically-impaired child.

Authors:  R I Spataru; D A Iozsa; M Ivanov
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.411

6.  Esophageal strictures during treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Kevin Kelly; Lorna Storey; Maureen O' Sullivan; Karina Butler; Michael McDermott; Martin Corbally; Corrina McMahon; Owen P Smith; Aengus O' Marcaigh
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.289

7.  Prognosis of congenital tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia on the basis of gap length.

Authors:  Vijay D Upadhyaya; A N Gangopadhyaya; D K Gupta; S P Sharma; Vijayendra Kumar; Anand Pandey; Ashish D Upadhyaya
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Delayed primary anastomosis for esophageal atresia: 18 months' to 11 years' follow-up.

Authors:  P Puri; G K Ninan; N S Blake; R J Fitzgerald; E J Guiney; B O'Donnell
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 9.  Oesophageal atresia.

Authors:  Lewis Spitz
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Gender and birth weight as risk factors for anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anahid Teimourian; Felipe Donoso; Pernilla Stenström; Helena Arnadottir; Einar Arnbjörnsson; Helene Lilja; Martin Salö
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.