| Literature DB >> 35222629 |
Honghai Li1, Hongtao Deng2, Yi Zhang3.
Abstract
This study aims to arouse students' interest in physical education (PE) in response to President Xi Jinping's call to strengthen students' physical quality because cultural courses occupy PE classes. Problem-based learning (PBL) is introduced, and a new teaching method of PE is proposed based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) in deep learning (DL). This method is employed to teach the experimental subjects in solid ball throwing. The students' interest, learning ability, and physical quality in the solid ball are investigated by a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire survey shows that the students' academic performance in solid ball throwing is improved, and their problem-solving ability, group cooperation ability, and theory learning ability are improved. Their time on a 1000-meter long run is shortened, and their body flexibility is improved. Therefore, it is believed that this new teaching method based on DL plays a significant role in improving students' physical quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222629 PMCID: PMC8881171 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4806763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Teaching process by using PBL.
Characteristics of the PBL teaching method.
| Characteristics | Content |
|---|---|
| The questions are orientated. | Students can discuss the questions with their imagination and knowledge. There are no fixed answers, so students must improve their ability to analyze the questions. Teachers or students can design the questions. |
| It is student-centered. | Teachers just need to raise questions or guide the direction of the discussion, and students should think about the answers to the questions and solve the problems encountered in the teaching process. |
| Students learn knowledge independently. | Students can think about how to learn, what to know, and where to learn. All the students should explore the most effective way in their learning process. |
| Students learn knowledge in groups. | Students can team up actively in the face of too complex problems and simplify complex issues through mutual assistance and task division. Within the group, they can exchange ideas and share achievements. |
PBL links.
| Teaching links | Content |
|---|---|
| Scenario | Teachers design scenarios, ask questions, and display them through texts, pictures, audios, or videos |
| Analysis | Students analyze the questions, organize the thinking process, and decide whether to discuss in groups or by themselves |
| Solution | According to the design or group division, team members collect, collocate, analyze, and process the data in communication, idea exchange, and solution proposal |
| Evaluation | Individuals or group members show the results, explain their ideas, and finally optimize their solving methods. And teachers summarize at last. |
Figure 2Procedure of traditional teaching methods.
Differences between the PBL teaching method and traditional teaching methods.
| The teaching methods | Learning form | Center | Teaching measures | Interaction degree | Teaching forms | Attitudes towards mistakes in the learning process | Teacher's roles | Students' knowledge | Knowledge chain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The PBL teaching method | Group learning | Student-centered | Improving students' skills | Interaction between students | Cooperation between students and teachers | Learning from the mistakes | The teacher only assigns the tasks | Students can master the skills they have learned | Students can use the knowledge and resources positively |
| Traditional teaching methods | All students are learning in a large class | Teacher-centered | Acquiring knowledge | Less interaction in the learning process | Teacher's lecture and instructions | Passively learning | Teachers deliver knowledge all the time | The knowledge learned is quickly forgotten | Learning tasks are the only teaching resources |
Characteristics of DL.
| Characteristics | Content |
|---|---|
| Student-centered | Learners are responsible for themselves and interested in the study. They can improve their learning quality and effect, and teachers guide the students to meet their needs. |
| Lifelong learning | Shallow learning only focuses on the immediate task and lacks reflection and evaluation for learning effects. DL requires timely correctness in understanding and constantly improves students' proficiency in knowledge. |
| Understanding ability | Shallow learning is passive learning, while DL focuses on understanding and solving problems with a skeptical attitude, which can help evaluate their learning effects and improve their profound thinking ability. |
| Integration ability | DL emphasizes integrating new and old knowledge and helps acquire knowledge more widely and establish their knowledge bases |
| Transformation ability | It can improve their self-understanding abilities, self-examination, self-evaluation, self-control, and transformation and summarize the knowledge learned |
| Application ability | Shallow learning only solves immediate problems mechanically, while DL teaches students to solve problems using their knowledge |
| Problem-solving ability | Shallow learning can only solve problems with scattered knowledge, while DL emphasizes applying knowledge learned in real life to solve complex problems |
| Higher-order thinking | Shallow learning only focuses on low-level activities, such as understanding, memory, and recitation, while DL emphasizes high-level activities, such as application, analysis, evaluation, and creation |
Figure 3Process of DL.
Figure 4Structure of CNN.
Figure 5Process of the experiment.
Questionnaire on the solid ball training for primary and secondary school students.
| Course | Classes | Grades |
|---|---|---|
| Survey on solid ball training | Questions | Rating |
| In the classroom, I usually ask questions. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| In course training, I can find my own mistakes and correct them. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I can correct my mistakes under teachers' guidance. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I can find others' mistakes in cooperation. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I can find my mistakes by comparison. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I can think about action at different stages. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I can consult the information of the solid ball and do some research in learning to throw the solid ball. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I can actively find the difficulties. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I am thinking actively in the theory course. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I usually turn to teachers and students for help when I have trouble learning. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I am willing to share my thoughts and ideas with my classmates. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I actively communicate with group members. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I actively help team members when they are in trouble. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I usually actively display the results. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I usually discuss with teachers about the difficulties. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I usually express my opinions when classmates show theirs. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| I think solid ball training can help us have teamwork awareness. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| This teaching method can improve my communication skills. | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Other | ||
Validity of the questionnaire.
| Evaluation items | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Highest (%) | Higher (%) | Lower (%) | |
| Contents | 30 | 62 | 8 |
| Quantity | 38 | 61 | 1 |
| Structure | 16 | 69 | 15 |
Figure 6Scores of students' results.
Figure 7Test results of students' physical fitness.