| Literature DB >> 35222580 |
Ezona E Ntlahla1, Mvuyisi Mo Mfengu1, Godwill A Engwa2, Benedicta N Nkeh-Chungag2, Constance R Sewani-Rusike1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though gut permeability has shown to be associated with measures of obesity and hypertension, its relationship with endothelial dysfunction, an early predictor for cardiovascular diseases remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Gut permeability; endothelial dysfunction; hypertension; inflammation; obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35222580 PMCID: PMC8843265 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v21i3.26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Prevalence of pre-hypertension and hypertension
| Gender | Population size | NT | Pre-HPT | HPT |
| n | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
|
| 77 | 41 (53.25) | 25 (32.46) | 11 (14.29) |
|
| 74 | 28 (37.84) | 36(48.64) | 16 (21.62) |
|
| 151 | 69 (45.60) | 61 (40.40) | 27 (17.88) |
Note: n: number of participants; NT: Normotensive; Pre-HPT; Pre-hypertensive; HPT: Hypertensive
Characteristics of participants based on blood pressure
| Characteristics | NT | Pre-HPT | HPT |
| (n=63) | (n=61) | (n=27) | |
|
| 21.9±0.3 | 22.1±0.2 | 22.2±0.3 |
|
| 63.7±1.6 | 66.9±2.1 | 74.9±3.5 |
|
| 1.63±0.01 | 1.66±0.01 | 1.66±0.01 |
|
| 23.9±0.6 | 24.1±0.7 | 27.1±1.2 |
|
| 4.6±0.3 | 5.7±0.4 | 8.0±1.1 |
|
| 29.0±1.2 | 29.7±1.1 | 30.9±1.9 |
|
| 78.3±1.5 | 77.6±1.8 | 86.0±2.9 |
|
| 72.1±0.7 | 79.9±0.8 | 95.1±1.7 |
|
| 108.7±0.9 | 123±1.0 | 141.9±2.2 |
|
| 73.5±1.5 | 72.4±1.6 | 74.5±2.4 |
Note: Data was presented as mean ± S.E.M; NT: Normotensive; Pre-HPT: Pre hypertensive; HPT: Hypertensive; BMI: Body Mass Index; VF: Visceral fat; SMF: Skeletal muscle fat; WC: Waist circumference; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; HR: Heart rate
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001 compared to NT
Figure 1Comparison of ADMA in hypertensive, pre-hypertensive and normotensive participants. Data was presented as mean± S.E.M. ADMA: Asymmetric dimethylarginine; NT: Normotensive; Pre-HPT: Prehypertensive; HPT: Hypertensive; F: Females; M: Males;
Figure 2Comparison of nitric oxide in hypertensive, pre-hypertensive and normotensive participants. Data was presented as mean± S.E.M. NO: Nitric oxide; NT: Normotensive; Pre-HPT: Pre-hypertensive; HPT: Hypertensive; F: Females; M: Males; *p<0.05
Figure 3Comparison of plasma zonulin concentration in hypertensive, pre-hypertensive and normotensive participants. Data was presented as mean± S.E.M. NT: Normotensive; Pre-HPT: Pre hypertensive; HPT: Hypertensive; F: Females; M: Males; *p<0.05 compared to NT.
Figure 4Comparison of plasma adiponectin (ADP) concentration in hypertensive, pre-hypertensive and normotensive participants. Data was presented as mean± S.E.M. NT: Normotensive; Pre-HPT: Pre hypertensive; HPT: Hypertensive; F: Females; M: Males; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 compared to NT.
Correlation of adiponectin with blood pressure, endothelial function and body composition
| Variable | Females | Males | Cohort | |||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| p-value | |||
|
| -0.20 | 0.08 | -0.22 |
| -0.21 |
|
|
| -0.28 |
| -0.41 |
| -0.33 |
|
|
| 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.84 | 0.09 | 0.26 |
|
| -0.04 | 0.72 | 0.03 | 0.80 | -0.02 | 0.85 |
|
| -0.20 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.59 | -0.07 | 0.37 |
|
| -0.39 |
| -0.19 | 0.11 | -0.31 |
|
|
| -0.39 |
| -0.35 |
| -0.36 |
|
|
| -0.44 |
| -0.36 |
| -0.4 |
|
Note: r: correlation coefficient; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; ADMA: Asymmetrical dimethylarginine; NO: Nitric oxide; ADP: Adiponectin BMI: Body Mass Index; VF: Visceral fat; WC: Waist circumference
Correlation of gut permeability with blood pressure, endothelial function, adiponectin and body composition
| Variable: | Females | Males | Cohort | |||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 0.5 | 0.08 | 0.3 |
|
| 0.22 |
| 0.06 | 0.61 | -0.09 | 0.29 |
|
| -0.28 |
| -0.40 |
| -0.33 |
|
|
| 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.37 |
| 0.26 |
|
|
| -0.02 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.59 | -0.07 | 0.37 |
|
| 0.29 |
| 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.14 | 0.09 |
|
| 0.48 |
| -0.02 | 0.84 | 0.20 |
|
|
| 0.38 |
| -0.02 | 0.84 | 0.20 |
|
Note: r: correlation coefficient; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; ADMA: Asymmetrical dimethylarginine; NO: Nitric oxide; ADP: Adiponectin BMI: Body Mass Index; VF%: Visceral fat; WC: Waist circumference.
Regression analysis of adiponectin with blood pressure, endothelial function and body composition
| Variable | Females | Males | Cohort | |||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| p-value | |||
|
| -0.044 | 0.688 | -0.017 | 0.877 | -0.029 | 0.706 |
|
| -0.145 | 0.179 | 0.095 | 0.378 | -0.040 | 0.602 |
|
| -0.103 | 0.355 | 0.161 | 0.131 | 0.020 | 0.795 |
|
| 0.112 | 0.305 | 0.075 | 0.487 | 0.073 | 0.338 |
|
| -0.016 | 0.895 | -0.004 | 0.973 | -0.040 | 0.599 |
|
| -0.157 | 0.287 | 0.109 | 0.470 | -0.098 | 0.315 |
|
| -4.452 |
| -0.157 | 0.621 | -2.845 |
|
|
| -0.078 | 0.646 | -2.044 |
| -0.142 | 0.198 |
Note: B: regression coefficient; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; ADMA: Asymmetrical dimethylarginine; NO: Nitric oxide; ADP: Adiponectin BMI: Body Mass Index; VF: Visceral fat; WC: Waist circumference.
Regression of gut permeability with blood pressure, endothelial function, adiponectin and body composition
| Variable: | Females | Males | Cohort | |||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| -1.865 |
| -3.39 | 0.087 | -1.778 |
|
|
| 0.086 | 0.543 | 1.516 | 0.241 | 0.154 | 0.154 |
|
| -0.096 | 0.378 | 0.021 | 0.863 | -0.005 | 0.954 |
|
| -0.176 | 0.095 | 0.662 | 0.721 | -0.016 | 0.841 |
|
| -0.026 | 0.818 | -0.566 | 0.488 | -0.080 | 0.327 |
|
| 0.074 | 0.606 | 0.630 | 0.733 | 1.239 |
|
|
| 17.544 |
| -7.46 | 0.533 | 0.090 | 0.268 |
|
| -0.071 | 0.670 | 4.174 | 0.777 | 0.133 | 0.102 |
Note: B: Regression coefficient; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; ADMA: Asymmetrical dimethylarginine; NO: Nitric oxide; ADP: Adiponectin BMI: Body Mass Index; VF%: Visceral fat; WC: Waist circumference.