| Literature DB >> 35222513 |
Lei Ji1,2, Changfeng Chen3, Binyin Hou1,2, Decheng Ren1,2, Fan Yuan1,2, Liangjie Liu1,2, Yan Bi1,2, Zhenming Guo1,2, Fengping Yang1,2, Xi Wu1,2, Fujun Chen1,2, Xingwang Li1,2, Chuanxin Liu3, Zhen Zuo3, Rong Zhang4, Zhenghui Yi2, Yifeng Xu2, Lin He1,2, Yi Shi1,2, Tao Yu1,4, Guang He1,2.
Abstract
Polymorphisms in the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene are related to individual differences in negative emotions, such as depressive symptoms and anxiety. However, it remains unclear what the potential roles of OXTR polymorphisms are in subjective well-being (SWB), which is negatively correlated with depressive symptoms. We examined attributional styles as mediator between SWB and five polymorphisms of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR rs53576, rs2254298, rs1042778, rs2268494, and rs2268490) among 627 full-time college freshmen (M age = 20.90, SD = 0.82 for male; M age = 20.81, SD = 0.92 for female) using structural equation modeling. The results showed that individuals with the OXTR rs2254298 AA genotype and rs53576 AA/GA genotype reported higher scores on SWB, which suggested that individuals with this genotype experienced more happiness. Moreover, external attributional style partially mediated the association between OXTR rs2254298 polymorphism and SWB (β = 0.019, 95%CI [0.001, 0.036], p = 0.035). In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that the genetic variations of OXTR played a role in the individual differences of SWB, and external attribution style could mediate the association.Entities:
Keywords: OXTR gene polymorphisms; attributional style; intermediary role; rs2254298 SNP; subjective well-being
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222513 PMCID: PMC8864163 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.763628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
OXTR single nucleotide polymorphism characteristics
| SNP | Chromosome location | Molecular consequence | Major/minor allele | MAF* | Genotype frequencies N (%) | HWE p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs53576 | chr3: 8762685 | intron_variant | A/G | 0.33 | AA: 301 (48.2) | AG: 263 (42.1) | GG: 60 (9.6) | 0.945 |
| rs2254298 | chr3: 8760542 | intron_variant | G/A | 0.15 | GG: 291 (46.4) | GA: 276 (44.0) | AA: 60 (9.6) | 0.896 |
| rs1042778 | chr3: 8752859 | 3_prime_UTR_variant | G/T | 0.40 | GG: 529 (84.5) | GT: 92 (14.7) | TT: 5 (0.8) | 0.899 |
| rs2268494 | chr3: 8760360 | intron_variant | T/A | 0.07 | TT: 544 (87.2) | TA: 78 (12.5) | AA: 2 (0.3) | 0.876 |
| rs2268490 | chr3: 8755399 | intron_variant | C/T | 0.15 | CC: 171 (27.4) | CT: 308 (49.3) | TT: 146 (23.4) | 0.937 |
SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MAF*, minor allele frequency observed in our sample; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; OXT, oxytocin gene; chr, chromosome.
Characteristics of the study population
| Range | Total | Male (N = 227) | Female (N = 400) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 18, 24 | 20.84 (0.89) | 20.90 (0.82) | 20.81 (0.92) | 0.244 |
| Residence = Urban (%) | 229 (36.5%) | 92 (40.5%) | 137 (34.2%) | 0.138 | |
| Minority = Han (%) | 607 (96.8%) | 218 (96.0%) | 389 (97.2%) | 0.552 | |
| Family history of psychosis = Yes (%) | 39 (6.2%) | 9 (4.0%) | 30 (7.5%) | 0.112 | |
| SWB (mean (SD)) | -2.4, -2.5 | 0 (0.92) | 0.02 (0.92) | -0.01 (0.91) | 0.647 |
| SWL | 5, 35 | 20.35 (5.89) | 20.50 (6.06) | 20.26 (5.80) | 0.629 |
| PANAS.pos | 16, 48 | 32.58 (5.57) | 32.85 (5.53) | 32.42 (5.59) | 0.356 |
| PANAS.neg | 10, 47 | 24.63 (7.07) | 25.12 (7.09) | 24.34 (7.04) | 0.188 |
| MMCS (mean (SD)) | |||||
| Ability attribution | 4, 24 | 13.26 (3.33) | 13.62 (3.42) | 13.06 (3.27) |
|
| Effort attribution | 3, 24 | 14.28 (3.28) | 14.70 (3.23) | 14.04 (3.28) |
|
| Context attribution | 5, 24 | 14.04 (3.28) | 14.13 (3.29) | 14.00 (3.28) | 0.633 |
| Luck attribution | 0, 24 | 12.24 (3.66) | 12.70 (3.50) | 11.97 (3.72) |
|
SWL: the satisfaction with life scale.
PANAS: the positive and negative affect scale.
MMCS: The Multidimensional–Multiattributional Causality Scale.
Bold values indicate significant level (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 1Heat map illustrating correlations between subjective well-being and attributional style. The values in the upper triangular matrix are correlation coefficients. In the lower triangular matrix, the darker the color is, the stronger correlation is. Positive correlations are shown in green, while negative correlations are shown in brown. Except for the correlation between subjective well-being and ability attribution and total attribution, the other correlation coefficients were significant at 0.001 level. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Regression analyses on the impacts of OXTR SNPs on affiliation attributional styles
| Variable | rs53576 | Statistic of regression analyses | rs2254298 | Statistic of regression analyses | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GA + AA |
|
| t | p | fdr | GA + GG | AA |
|
| t | p | fdr | |
| SWB | −0.32 (0.91) | 0.03 (0.91) | −0.36 | 0.013 | −2.88 |
|
| -0.03 (0.91) | 0.28 (0.96) | 0.306 | 0.01 | 2.475 |
| 0.035 |
| Ability attribution | 0.27 (1.01) | 0.04 (0.99) | 0.231 | 0.005 | 1.721 | 0.086 | 0.173 | 0.09 (1.00) | −0.21 (0.90) | −0.3 | 0.008 | −2.2 |
| 0.036 |
| Effort attribution | 0.16 (0.97) | 0.05 (0.97) | 0.108 | 0.001 | 0.827 | 0.409 | 0.409 | 0.08 (0.97) | −0.07 (0.94) | −0.15 | 0.002 | −1.16 | 0.246 | 0.246 |
| Context attribution | 0.15 (1.13) | -0.04 (0.99) | 0.193 | 0.003 | 1.422 | 0.156 | 0.195 | 0.01 (1.02) | −0.29 (0.83) | −0.3 | 0.008 | −2.19 |
| 0.036 |
| Luck attribution | 0.26 (0.97) | 0.04 (0.99) | 0.22 | 0.004 | 1.63 | 0.104 | 0.173 | 0.10 (0.99) | −0.29 (0.93) | −0.39 | 0.013 | −2.88 |
| 0.020 |
Bold values indicate significant level (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2The figure shows the multiple mediations of context attribution style and luck attribution style in the association between OXTR rs2254298 and subjective well-being (SWB is a latent variable). All estimates are standardized, with * indicating p < 0.05, ** indicating p < 0.01, *** indicating p < 0.001, and grey line indicating nonsignificant. Note: “c” refers to the total effect of OXTR rs2254298 on subjective well-being; “c’” refers to the direct effect of OXTR rs2254298 on subjective well-being after controlling for context attribution and luck attribution.
Multiple mediation model test with bootstrapping
| Mediators | Estimate | Se | z-value | 95% | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Effect | 0.089 | 0.044 | 2.032 | (0.003, 0.174) |
|
| Indirect Effect 1 (O→L→S) | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.890 | (−0.008, 0.022) | 0.373 |
| Indirect Effect 2 (O→C→S) | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.690 | (−0.005, 0.010) | 0.490 |
| Indirect Effect 3 (O→L→C→S) | 0.009 | 0.005 | 1.934 | (0.000, 0.019) | 0.053 |
| Total Indirect Effect | 0.019 | 0.009 | 2.111 | (0.001, 0.036) |
|
| Total Effect | 0.107 | 0.045 | 2.372 | (0.019, 0.196) |
|
Note. 95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
Bold values indicate significant level (p < 0.05).