| Literature DB >> 35222033 |
Jiayi Xiang1,2,3, Huifang Zhang1,2,3, Xingcheng Zhou1,2,3, Dan Wang1,2,3, Rongyu Chen1,2,3, Wanlin Tan1,2, Luqun Liang1,2,3, Mingjun Shi1,2,3, Fan Zhang1,2,3, Ying Xiao1,2,3, Yuxia Zhou1,2,3, Yuanyuan Wang1,2,3, Bing Guo1,2,3.
Abstract
Atorvastatin is a classical lipid-lowering drug. It has been reported to have renoprotective effects, such as reducing urinary protein excretion and extracellular matrix aggregation. The present study aimed to investigate the specific mechanism of action of Atorvastatin in type 1 diabetic mice (T1DM) in inhibiting renal tubular epithelial cell injury following treatment with high glucose and high fat. The anti-injury mechanism of Atorvastatin involved the inhibition of miR-21 expression and the upregulation of the transcription and expression of its downstream gene Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-α(PPARα). An increase in blood glucose and lipid levels was noted in the T1DM model, which was associated with renal fibrosis and inflammation. These changes were accompanied by increased miR-21 levels, downregulation of PPARα and Mfn1 expressions, and upregulation of Drp1 and IL6 expressions in renal tissues. These phenomena were reversed following the administration of Atorvastatin. miR-21 targeted PPARα by inhibiting its mRNA translation. Inhibition of miR-21 expression or Fenofibrate (PPARα agonist) administration prevented the decrease of PPARα in renal tubular epithelial cells under high glucose (HG) and high fat (Palmitic acid, PA) conditions, alleviating lipid metabolism disorders and reducing mitochondrial dynamics and inflammation. Consistent with the in vivo results, the in vitro findings also demonstrated that mRTECs administered with Atorvastatin in HG + PA increased PPARα expression and restored the normal expression of Mfn1 and Drp1, and effectively increasing the number of biologically active mitochondria and ATP content, reducing ROS production, and restoring mitochondrial membrane potential following Atorvastatin intervention. In addition, these effects were noted to the inhibition of FN expression and tubular cell inflammatory response; however, in the presence of miR-21mimics, the aforementioned effects of Atorvastatin were significantly diminished. Based on these observations, we conclude that Atorvastatin inhibits tubular epithelial cell injury in T1DM with concomitant induction of lipid metabolism disorders by a mechanism involving inhibition of miR-21 expression and consequent upregulation of PPARα expression. Moreover, Atorvastatin regulated lipid metabolism homeostasis and PPARα to restore mitochondrial function. The results emphasize the potential of Atorvastatin to exhibit lipid-regulating functions and non-lipid effects that balance mitochondrial dynamics.Entities:
Keywords: PPARα; atorvastatin; diabetic kidney disease; fenofibrate; lipid metabolism disorders; miR-21; mitochondrial dynamics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222033 PMCID: PMC8874267 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.819787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Primers used in qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Sequence |
|---|---|
| PPARα-mouse | Forward: 5′-AAAAGAATCCCCAGCTTATCCA-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TTGGTGACTTCCCCTAGGTATA-3′ | |
| GAPDH-mouse | Forward: 5′-GAACGGGAAGCTCACTGG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCT-3′ | |
| ACOX1-mouse | Forward: 5′-GGCTTTGGTGGATGCCTTTG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-GGACTTCTTGCCCACTCAA-3′ | |
| CPT1a-mouse | Forward: 5′-CGGCAGACCTATTTTGCACG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TAGATGCCTCAGGGTCCTCC-3′ |
FIGURE 1Atorvastatin improves renal fibrosis and restores renal function in diabetic mice. Effects of Atorvastatin on blood glucose, renal function, and fibrotic lesions in diabetic mice. (A) The blood glucose levels in the DM group were significantly higher than those in the control group, while no statistically significant difference was noted in the Atorvastatin group. The renal urea nitrogen (B), serum creatinine (C), and 24-h total urine microalbumin (D) levels were measured. H&E staining (E) was performed to observe the renal pathological changes in mice and to assess the tubular injury index (F). PAS staining (G) was performed to assess the thylakoid expansion index (H). Sirius red staining (I), collagen deposition fraction (J). Black arrows indicate the site of lymphocyte infiltration; white arrows indicate the glomerular basement membrane. Immunoblotting bands (K) and quantitative data (L–O) of FN, PPARα, Mfn1, Drp1, and IL-6 in each group of mice. All images are magnified ×200. NC: normal diet-fed rats; DM: type 1 diabetic mice; ATO: type 1 diabetic mice treated with Atorvastatin. All data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. n = 6; *p < 0.05 vs. NC group. #p < 0.05, compared with the DM group.
FIGURE 2Atorvastatin restores PPARα expression and improves lipid metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic mice. Atorvastatin improves renal fibrosis and restores renal function in diabetic mice. The effects of Atorvastatin in blood. The experiments aimed to detect the changes in lipid metabolism and mitochondria-related indicators in each group. (A, B) Quantification of triglycerides (A) and total cholesterol (B) in three groups of kidney tissues. (C–E) Transfection of si-PPARα and its control sequence into mRTECs cells. qPCR was performed to detect the expression levels of PPARα (C), and its downstream target genes ACOX1 (D) and CPT1a (E). (F–G) Immunoblot analysis of PPARα, CPT1a in the three groups of kidney tissues, presenting quantitative data (G, H). (I–J) Immunohistochemical staining (I), and quantitative analysis (J) of PPARα. (K–M). Immunoblotting for the detection of Mfn1 and Drp1 expression (K) and quantitative analysis of the results (L, M). (N–O) Immunohistochemical staining (N), and quantitative analysis (O) of Mfn1. (P, Q) Detection of malondialdehyde (MDA) content (P) and total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) content (Q) in the three groups of kidney tissues. The in vivo experiments included the following groups: NC: normal diet-fed rats; DM: type 1 diabetic mice; ATO: type 1 diabetic mice treated with Atorvastatin. All data are indicative of mean ± SD from three independent experiments. n = 6; *p < 0.05 vs NC group. #p < 0.05, compared with the DM group.
FIGURE 3miR-21 directly targets and inhibits PPARα expression. The effects of Atorvastatin on specific blood parameters. The experiments aimed to detect the changes in lipid metabolism and mitochondria-related indicators in each group. miR-21 directly targets and inhibits PPARα expression. (A, B) The expression levels of miR-21 (A) and PPARα mRNA (B) were detected in the kidney tissues of mice in each group. n = 6; *p < 0.05 vs NC group. #p < 0.05, compared with the DM group. (C) Predicted binding sequences and mutation sites between miR-21 and PPARα 3′UTR seed sites. (D) Cotransfection of HK-2 cells with 50 nM miR-21 mimic or NC mimic and 100 ng of WT or MUT plasmid containing PPARα 3′UTR and 5 ng of Renilla plasmid. The dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to detect luciferase activity of WT and MUT plasmids. The data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3, *p < 0.05. (E. F) The expression levels of PPARα were detected by western blot analysis 24 h following transfection with miR-22 or NC mimics (E). ImageJ optical density analysis of protein levels (F). (G) Correlation analysis between miR-21 expression and PPARα protein expression. All data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. n = 3; *p < 0.05 vs NC group. #p < 0.05, compared with the DM group.
FIGURE 4Both miR-21 inhibitors and Fenofibrate slow down renal tubular injury caused by high glucose or high fat. mRTEC cells were incubated with NG (5.5 mM) and HG (25 mM) medium, respectively, and transfected with miR-21 inhibitor and its control agent as (HG + Veh group, HG + miR-21 inhibitor group) in HG-treated cells for 48 h. (A) Immunoblotting bands corresponding to FN, PPARα, Mfn1, Drp1, and IL-6 expressions in RTEC cells of each group. mRTEC cells were treated with palmitic acid solvent. 95% anhydrous ethanol (0.02 ml) was added in the NC group and palmitic acid PA (0.2 mM) in the PA group (PA-treated). RTEC cells were transfected with miR-21 inhibitor and its control agent (PA + Veh group, PA + miR-21 inhibitor group) following 48 h of incubation. Subsequently, the samples were analyzed. (B) Immunoblotting bands corresponding to FN, PPARα, Mfn1, Drp1, and IL-6 expressions in RTEC cells of each group. (C–E) The expression levels of FN, PPARα, Mfn1, Drp1, and IL-6 in RTEC cells treated with HG, PA, and HG + PA, respectively, and subsequently incubated with Fenofibrate (0.05 mM) for 48 h. The expression levels of FN, PPARα, Mfn1, Drp1, and IL-6 proteins were analyzed under HG (F), PA (G), and HG + PA(H) conditions, respectively. All data are indicative of mean ± SD from three independent experiments. n = 3.
FIGURE 5Atorvastatin restores PPARα expression by inhibiting miR-21 expression and improves mitochondrial function impairment in renal tubular epithelial cells induced by high glucose and high fat. The mRTEC cells were cultured with NG and HG + PA medium, and Atorvastatin and its solvent DMSO were added to the HG + PA-treated cells as the treatment group and treatment control group, respectively. The cells were also transfected with miR-21 mimics and treated with HG + PA + ATO. (A-F)They were subsequently cultured for 48 h. Immunoblot bands (A) and quantitative data (B–F) of FN, PPARα, Mfn1, Drp1, and IL-6 in each cell group. (G) Representative confocal microscope images of mitochondrial morphology stained by MitoTracker Red. Original magnification ×600. (H) Quantification of mitochondrial number per cell. White arrows represent high fluorescence intensity. (I–J) Flow cytometry analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential changes in each group of cells (I), quantitative data (J). (K–L) Flow cytometry analysis of ROS production (K), quantitative data (L) for each group of cells. (M) Assessment of the ATP content in the cells of each group. All data are mean ± SD from three independent experiments. n = 3; *p < 0.05 vs NC group. #p < 0.05, compared with the HG + PA group. p < 0.05, compared with the HG + PA + ATO group; **p < 0.01 vs NC group. ##p < 0.01, compared with the HG + PA group. p < 0.01, compared with the HG + PA + ATO group.