Literature DB >> 35221966

A Rare Case of Simultaneous Pheochromocytoma Accompanied with an Ileocecal Neuroendocrine Tumor.

Karim M Eltawil1,2, Carly Whalen1, Julie N Leal1, John Kelly MacDonald2,3,4, Owen Prowse2,5.   

Abstract

The detection rates of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rising, which has led to a better understanding of their histopathologic characteristics. We present a case of adrenal pheochromocytoma with an incidental finding of a concurrent ileocecal NET detected on early post-adrenalectomy imaging. A 59-year-old male was noted to have microscopic hematuria on a routine workup. Further imaging identified a right adrenal lesion suggestive of pheochromocytoma. He was reporting intermittent headaches, and his urinary normetanephrine and norepinephrine levels were elevated. He underwent a right retroperitoneal adrenalectomy, and pathology confirmed a pheochromocytoma with no malignancy. Postoperatively, he developed a hematoma at the surgical bed that was identified on CT scan. An incidental lesion at the level of the ileocecal valve was noted on the CT scan as well. This was further investigated by colonoscopy and biopsy that confirmed a carcinoid tumor. He had no gastrointestinal symptoms, chromogranin A was normal, and 24-h urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels were slightly elevated. He subsequently underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy 3 months from his initial adrenalectomy. Final pathology confirmed a grade 2 NET with metastatic involvement of 4 regional lymph nodes. We report an extremely rare case of simultaneous pheochromocytoma accompanied with an ileocecal NET. Genetic testing for multiple endocrine neoplasia was undertaken and was found negative for 9 tested genes.
Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Neuroendocrine tumor; Pheochromocytoma

Year:  2022        PMID: 35221966      PMCID: PMC8832201          DOI: 10.1159/000520384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Oncol        ISSN: 1662-6575


Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms that originate in the secretory cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system. They are characterized by a relatively indolent rate of growth and by their ability to secrete peptide hormones and biogenic amines [1]. Gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NETs represent the second most common digestive tract neoplasms [2]. According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data of the National Cancer Institute in the USA, the annual age-adjusted incidence rate of GEP-NETs increased from 1.09 per 100,000 in 1973 to 6.98 per 100,000 in 2012 [3]. This interpretation can be explained by the increased availability and improved quality of imaging modalities as well as improved recognition of neuroendocrine histology. Thirty percent of GEP-NETs originate in the small intestine, followed by the rectum (26.3%) and the colon (17.6%) [4]. Pheochromocytomas are catecholamine-secreting tumors that arise from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla. Their incidence ranges from 0.005% to 0.1% of the general population and from 0.1% to 0.2% of the adult hypertensive population [5]. They are more frequent in individuals aged 40–50 years with a slight predominance in females (55.2%) compared to males (44.8%) [6]. We report a rare case of pheochromocytoma with an incidental finding of terminal ileal NET that was detected while investigating a postoperative complication following the initial adrenalectomy.

Case Presentation

A 59-year-old gentleman was noted to have microscopic hematuria on routine medical and laboratory checkup. He was referred for urologic assessment and underwent an abdominal ultrasound and subsequently computed tomography (CT) scan. This demonstrated a 3.3 × 2.9 cm right adrenal gland tumor with a washout study suggesting this could represent a pheochromocytoma (Fig. 1). He was complaining of intermittent headaches but denied any tremors, palpitations, or flushing. His blood pressure was within normal limits. He is a smoker, and his BMI was 18.5 kg/m2. He is otherwise healthy except for a remote history of gastrointestinal bleeding. The patient is not aware of his family medical history. His metabolic workup revealed elevated urinary normetanephrine and norepinephrine levels suggestive of a functional pheochromocytoma (Table 1). CT of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis did not demonstrate any evidence of metastatic disease.
Fig. 1

CT showing avidly enhancing right adrenal nodule measuring up to 3.5 cm.

Table 1

Tumor-specific blood work

TestResultReference range
Free urine1.47<28 μmol/day
normetanephrine
Urine norepinephrine1,147<575 nmol/day
Chromogranin A52≤76 ng/mL
5-HIAA46.2<40.0 μmol/day
CEA1.4≤3 μg/L

CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; 5-HIAA, 5-hydroxy-indolacetic acid.

The patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical considerations. As a precaution, he was blocked with alpha and beta blockade prior to surgery. The patient was sensitive to the beta blockade, developing bradycardia, and his dose was lowered. The patient's blood pressure was well controlled, as was his heart rate, at the time of surgery. He subsequently underwent an open retroperitoneal right adrenalectomy. He was kept in the intensive care unit for observation and was discharged home without any complications on postoperative day 4. The final pathology was consistent with pheochromocytoma with no evidence of malignancy. The lesion involved approximately 50% of the parenchyma with no extra-adrenal tumor extension and no lymph node involvement identified. One week following his discharge, the patient presented to the emergency department of his local hospital with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. He was noted to be dehydrated with mild elevation of his white blood cells count. He underwent a CT scan that showed a 16 × 6 × 7 cm collection in the surgical bed suggestive of an infected hematoma. He was therefore admitted to the hospital and treated with intravenous antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. After spending a few days in the hospital, his clinical condition improved and was discharged on a course of oral antibiotics with a plan for a follow-up CT to reassess the collection in the surgical bed. Three weeks later, he was continuing to feel well, and the repeat scan revealed marginal decrease in size of the hematoma. In addition, a new finding of a soft tissue density at the level of the ileocecal valve was noted. It measured approximately 3 cm associated with a prominent lymph node within ileocecal mesentery (Fig. 2). This was not interpreted on previous imaging studies, and the patient was denying any gastrointestinal symptoms such as rectal bleeding, changes to his bowel habits, or obstructive symptoms. He was therefore referred for a colonoscopy. On colonoscopy, a large polypoid lesion protruding through the ileocecal valve was identified. Multiple biopsies were taken and revealed a carcinoid tumor. The cells of interest were strongly positive for chromogranin. Chromogranin A was normal, and 24-h urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels were slightly elevated (Table 1). Imaging studies did not show any evidence of metastatic disease.
Fig. 2

CT showing soft tissue density at the ileocecal valve measuring approximately 3 cm.

A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was therefore performed. This was approximately 3 months following his adrenalectomy. The patient had no symptoms suggestive of carcinoid syndrome; however, given the slight elevation of his 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels, he was given a prophylactic dose of octreotide preoperatively. He did well postoperatively on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and was discharged home on postoperative day 3. The final pathology showed a grade 2 NET with metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma to 4 regional lymph nodes (pT4a, pN2a). The maximal tumor size was 3.9 cm (Fig. 3). The tumor was in the ileocecal valve region compressing but not invading the ileum. It extended to penetrate the cecal serosa and into the pericolic fat. Lymphovascular invasion was prominent around the lesion and at sites in the pericolic fat. It showed moderate cytologic atypia, mitotic count was 4/2 mm2, and Ki-67 index was 3–4%. Those pathological results were compatible with a stage III NET, and therefore adjuvant chemotherapy or somatostatin analogs were not offered.
Fig. 3

Open surgical specimen showing tumor involving the ileocecal valve area.

The patient was referred for genetic testing, and based on his personal history, he was offered testing for 9 genes (RET, VHL, SDHD, SDHB, SDHC, TMEM 127, MAX, SDHA, and MEN1), which can be associated with pheochromocytoma. No mutations were found in any of the 9 tested genes. At 15-month follow up, the patient continues to be asymptomatic with no clinical or radiological evidence of recurrence or metastatic disease.

Discussion

The incidence of gastrointestinal NETs (GI-NETs) has increased in the recent years. This may partly be due to increased physician awareness and improved diagnostic techniques [7]. The small bowel represents the most common site for NETs in the GI tract, and most of those originate in the terminal ileum [8]. The diagnosis of GI-NETs is based on clinical symptoms, hormone levels, radiological and nuclear imaging, and histological confirmation. Most NETs are nonfunctioning and are diagnosed incidentally during an unrelated procedure. Regional or distant metastasis is observed in 50% of patients at the time of presentation [2]. Initial metastases are usually noted in regional lymph nodes and then in the liver and distant sites such as the bone [9]. The symptoms of functioning NETs generally arise after the tumor has spread to the liver and cause a characteristic set of symptoms called “carcinoid syndrome”; this occurs in about 10% of patients and is characterized by flushing (63%–94% of patients), diarrhea (68%–84%), abdominal pain (10%–55%), telangiectasia (25%), and bronchoconstriction (3%–19%) [10, 11]. Surgery is the mainstay for treatment of local and locoregional GI-NETs. In recent years, management modalities for metastatic GI-NETs have expanded considerably. New systemic therapies for tumor and carcinoid syndrome control have been shown to delay tumor progression and diminish symptoms related to hormone secretion [12]. Pheochromocytomas are rare catecholamine-secreting tumors with an estimated annual incidence of approximately 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [13]. Most catecholamine-secreting tumors are sporadic; however, approximately 40% of patients have the disease as part of a familial disorder. About 10% of pheochromocytomas are malignant with evidence of metastatic disease or invasion of adjacent organs [14]. Symptoms are present in approximately 50% of patients with pheochromocytoma, and they are typically paroxysmal. The classic triad of symptoms in patients with pheochromocytoma consists of episodic headache, sweating, and tachycardia [15, 16]. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is made based upon biochemical confirmation of catecholamine hypersecretion, by measuring urinary and plasma fractionated metanephrines and catecholamines followed by identifying the tumor with imaging studies. Treatment of pheochromocytoma requires a multidisciplinary team approach that typically involves a physician (endocrinologist), surgeon, and anesthetist who are experienced in its management. If not contraindicated, surgical removal, the only curative procedure, should be performed expeditiously [14]. The co-existence of pheochromocytoma and NETs is extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, there are only 10 cases reported in the literature [17-26] (Table 2). Our patient presented with a minimally symptomatic sporadic pheochromocytoma that was detected on routine workup. A terminal ileal asymptomatic NET was detected on imaging studies performed to follow-up on a postoperative fluid collection. The 2 neoplasms were treated surgically with a time interval of 3 months between the 2 procedures. The coexistence of 2 rare tumors related to the endocrine system raised the possibility of an underlying genetic syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia. The patient therefore underwent genetic testing for pheochromocytoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome, and no underlying mutations were identified.
Table 2

Reported cases in the literature of co-existence of pheochromocytoma and neuroendocrine tumor

YearAuthorSite of NETSite of pheochromocytoma
1978Tateishi et al. [17]PancreasBilateral
2006Olivero et al. [18]AmpullaryExtra adrenal
1986Wheeler et al. [19]DuodenalBilateral
1980Kees [20]MetastaticUnilateral
1992Salinas et al. [21]Small bowelUnilateral
2006Caiazzo et al. [22]AmpullaryUnilateral
1970Warner et al. [23]Small boweln/a
1995Chan et al. [24]BronchialBilateral
1998Hardt et al. [25]AmpullaryUnilateral
2019Lanham et al. [26]Small bowelBilateral

Conclusions

We reported a rare case of simultaneous pheochromocytoma accompanied with a terminal ileal NET. We also reviewed similar coincidence cases published in the literature. A multidisciplinary team approach including surgeons, anesthesiologists, internists, radiologists, and pathologists was followed to plan the management along its course of progression. We recommend considering genetic testing for similar conditions of synchronous tumors related to the endocrine system to rule out an underlying genetic disorder.

Statement of Ethics

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. Ethical approval was not required for this study according to the regulations of the ethics committee at our organization.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

No funding was acquired for this study.

Author Contributions

K.M.E., C.W., and O.P. managed the perioperative course. K.M.E., C.W., J.N.L., and O.P. performed the 2 surgical procedures. K.M.E. and C.W. contributed to the drafting and the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Please contact the author for data requests.
  24 in total

1.  Pheochromocytoma: new concepts and future trends.

Authors:  E L Bravo
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  [A rare combination of pheochromocytoma ans somatostatin-rich neuroendocrine tumor of Vater's papilla (carcinoid) in a patient with von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis].

Authors:  P D Hardt; W E Doppl; H U Klör; B Hinrichs
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  The association of neurofibromatosis, pheochromocytoma, and somatostatin-rich duodenal carcinoid tumor.

Authors:  M H Wheeler; I R Curley; E D Williams
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  K E Öberg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  David C Metz; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  A simplified diagnostic approach to pheochromocytoma. A review of the literature and report of one institution's experience.

Authors:  P P Stein; H R Black
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Gregory A Kaltsas; G Michael Besser; Ashley B Grossman
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 8.  Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Mauro Cives; Jonathan R Strosberg
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 9.  An update on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Mauro Cives; Jonathan Strosberg
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.990

10.  Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States.

Authors:  Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.