Literature DB >> 35221961

Serologic Abnormalities in Macular Lymphocytic Arteritis with Case Presentation.

Nicole R Bender1, Elizabeth L Bisbee1, Douglas Robins1, Kiran Motaparthi1, Vladimir Vincek1.   

Abstract

Macular lymphocytic arteritis (MLA) is an indolent cutaneous small-medium-vessel vasculitis characterized by widespread asymptomatic livedo racemosa. A number of serologic abnormalities have been reported including an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and antibodies associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. We present a case of MLA with multiple serologic abnormalities, including those that have yet to be reported, such as anti-U1 ribonucleotide protein, anti-RNA polymerase III, anti-smith, and anti-proteinase 3 antibodies. We also provide a brief review of this unfamiliar entity with a focus on the appropriate workup.
Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiphospholipid antibodies; Lupus autoantibodies; Lymphocytic thrombophilic arteritis; Macular lymphocytic arteritis; Serologic abnormalities

Year:  2022        PMID: 35221961      PMCID: PMC8832186          DOI: 10.1159/000519658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol        ISSN: 1662-6567


Introduction

Macular lymphocytic arteritis (MLA), first described by Fein et al. [1] in 2003, is a rare medium-vessel vasculitis affecting the skin. This diagnosis has also been described under a different name, lymphocytic thrombophilic arteritis (LTA), to better emphasize the histologic features [2]. There has been debate regarding whether MLA and LTA represent distinct diagnoses from each other, as well as if they lie on a spectrum with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (cPAN), representing an early or indolent form of the disease [3]. Along with the majority of publications, we will presume MLA and LTA represent the same diagnosis, which exhibits minor clinical variations. Many patients will have an abnormal serologic examination, including an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), positive anticardiolipin (ACL) antibody, and antinuclear antibody profiles [4]. Despite these studies, the disease is overwhelmingly confined to the skin, and thus far long term follow up has not identified progression to a systemic vasculitis or cPAN [5]. We describe a case of MLA associated with multiple persistent positive autoantibody profiles that have not yet been previously reported.

Case Report/Case Presentation

A 48-year-old man from Trinidad and Tobago presented to the dermatology clinic with a 1-year history of asymptomatic hyperpigmentation on the bilateral lower legs and arms, mid chest, and abdomen. He had previously been found to have a number of abnormal serologic studies including an elevated ESR, positive ACL IgM, antinuclear antibody, anti-U1 ribonucleotide protein, anti-RNA polymerase III, anti-Smith, and anti-proteinase 3 antibodies. The full serologic assessment is shown in Table 1. The patient did not meet accepted criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, or mixed connective tissue disorder.
Table 1

Serologic assessment in our patient with MLA

LabMeasurementNormal reference range
ESR, mm/h330–10
CRP, mg/L0.620.20–5.00
ACL IgM, mpl μ/mL30.3<20
ACL IgG, gpl μ/mL<9.4<20
Anti-ß2 glycoprotein I IgM, smu μ/mL<9.4<20
Anti-ß2 glycoprotein I IgG, sgu μ/mL<9.4<20
Lupus anticoagulantNegative
ANA1:1,280 speckled<1:40
Anti-Smith (AI)>8.00.0–0.9
Anti-centromere (AI)<0.20.0–0.9
Anti-dsDNA, IU/mL<10–9
SSA-Ro (AI)<0.20.0–0.9
SSB-La (AI)0.20.0–0.9
Anti-Scl-70 (units)<20<20
Anti-PM/Scl-100 (units)<20<20
Anti-PM/Scl-75 (units)<20<20
RNP (AI)>8.00.0–0.9
Anti-U1 RNP (units)25<20
Anti-U3 RNP/fibrillarinNegative
Anti-RNA polymerase III (units)27<20
c-ANCA<1:20<1:20
p-ANCA<1:20<1:20
Anti-proteinase 3, U/mL4.50.0–3.5
Atypical p-ANCA<1:20<1:20
RF, IU/mL<100.0–14.0
Anti-CCP IgG, units80–19
C3, mg/dL11882–167
C4, mg/dL2312–38
Total CK, U/L24449–439
Aldolase, U/L3.83.3–10.3

CRP, c-reactive protein; ANA, antinuclear antibody; RNP, ribonucleotide protein; ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; RF, rheumatoid factor; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; C3, complement 3; C4, complement 4; CK, creatine kinase.

On physical exam, the patient had ill-defined dark brown hyperpigmented patches in a reticulate pattern resembling livedo racemosa on the lower legs (shown in Fig. 1) and an annular pattern on the mid chest. He had faint ill-defined brown macules and patches on the abdomen and arms. The remainder of his physical exam was normal, and full review of systems was negative for systemic symptoms. Histopathology from the left lower leg demonstrated a medium-vessel vasculitis involving a vessel at the deep dermal-subcuticular junction (shown in Fig. 2). The inflammatory infiltrate was composed almost entirely of lymphocytes with very rare neutrophils. There was luminal fibrin deposition and narrowing of the vessel lumen.
Fig. 1

Clinical image. Reticulated dark brown macules and patches resembling livedo racemosa on the bilateral lower legs.

Fig. 2

Histopathology image − punch biopsy from the left lower leg.aH&E staining (×15) demonstrates a medium-vessel vasculitis involving a vessel at the deep dermal-subcuticular junction.bH&E staining (×40) demonstrates lymphocytes with very rare neutrophils in the inflammatory infiltrate with luminal fibrin deposition and narrowing of the vessel lumen.cH&E staining (×100) demonstrates a distinct luminal ring of fibrin within the affected vessel. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Systemic workup, including CBC, CMP, creatine kinase, and aldolase, thyroid studies, urinalysis, and transthoracic echocardiogram were normal with the exception of a mildly decreased leukocyte count at 3.5 thou/mm3 and mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Given the asymptomatic nature of the eruption and that there currently is no established effective treatment for MLA, the patient elected for clinical monitoring.

Discussion

The clinical features of MLA have been well recognized as asymptomatic livedo racemosa or pigmented macules predominantly located on the lower legs. In most reports, these lesions are non-indurated, and nodules or ulcerations are absent on physical exam. Atypical clinical presentations including annular morphology, unilateral or diffuse distribution of lesions, the presence of nodules, ulcerations, or systemic involvement such as testicular infarction and neuropathy have been reported [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. MLA disproportionately affects women, primarily of black ethnicity, with the second most common groups being Asian and Caucasian patients [4]. Histologically, there is a lymphocyte-predominant small-to-medium sized vessel arteritis, affecting vessels in the deep dermis or upper subcutis. Neutrophils are absent to scarce, and the arteries are typically narrowed or occluded. Fibrin deposition within the vessel wall forming a distinct luminal ring is a hallmark of MLA [11]. LTA has been separately described, but has similar clinical and histologic features to MLA, with occasional infiltrative papules, nodules or ulcers [2]. In general, MLA and LTA are considered the same disease with minor variations in their clinical presentation. Additional confusion regarding whether these entities lie on a spectrum with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (cPAN) exists due to overlapping clinical and histologic features. A recent retrospective study compared blinded assessments of the clinicopathologic features of patients diagnosed with LTA and cPAN and determined the discriminating characteristics to be a widespread pattern of non-infiltrated and asymptomatic livedo racemosa with a paucity (≤5%) of neutrophils on histology for LTA. CPAN, in contrast, was associated with localized starburst livedo, purpura, episodes of pain, nodules and inflammatory ulcerations, and the presence (≥5%) of neutrophils on histology [6]. While there has been a single report of a patient diagnosed as MLA with evidence of systemic vasculitis (testicular infarcts and mononeuritis) [9], this disease overall follows a persistent indolent course. There have also been no reports of MLA/LTA with progression to cPAN, which also supports consideration of MLA/LTA and cPAN as distinct entities. Epidemiologically MLA is frequently seen in women, particularly women of color, with roughly one third of reported patients being of African descent [4]. MLA also tends to affect patients at a younger age compared to cPAN and has been associated with both human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B [12]. Interestingly, MLA has been associated with a number of lab abnormalities, shown in Table 2, including an elevated ESR, and positive ACL, anti-β2 glycoprotein, and antinuclear antibodies. Despite these findings, reported patients fail to meet criteria for specific autoimmune conditions, and occasionally these abnormalities are transitory with reversion back to normal in the months following diagnosis.
Table 2

Reported lab abnormalities in patients with MLA

LabPatients reported, n (including our patient)
Inflammatory markers
 ESR12
Autoantibodies
 ANA20
 ACL antibody12
 Anti-β2 glycoprotein4
 Lupus anticoagulant4
 RF2
 ANCA4 (3 unspecified, 1 c-ANCA)
 Anti-Proteinase 31
 SSA-Ro1
 Anti-histone1
 Anti-RNP antibodies1
 Anti-RNA polymerase III1
 Anti-CCP1
Prothrombotic factors
 Antiphospholipid antibodies (as above)20
 Factor V Leiden gene mutation4 (heterozygous)
 Prothrombin gene mutation3 (heterozygous)
 Low protein S activity1
Infectious studies
 HIV2
 HBV1

ANA, antinuclear antibody; RF, rheumatoid factor; ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; RNP, ribonucleotide protein; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus.

In addition to positive antiphospholipid antibodies, there have been reports of patients with heterozygous mutations in Factor V Leiden and prothrombin genes. While these generally confer risk for hypercoagulable states, end-organ damage from thromboembolic changes have not been reported in patients with MLA/LTA. This includes patients with other risk factors such as smoking and pregnancy. Possible exceptions to this include the single report of systemic involvement with testicular infarction [9] and 1 patient who developed transient vision loss in 1 eye lasting 2 min [13]. Criteria for the diagnosis of MLA/LTA has been posed as: (1) presence of macules, papules, and/or patches that follow a benign course; (2) histopathology demonstrating small-medium-vessel vasculitis with a predominantly lymphocytic infiltrate; and (3) absence of signs or symptoms to suggest systemic vasculitis [4]. Our patient presented with both typical clinical and histopathological characteristics of MLA and met the criteria stated above. He also had a number of serologic abnormalities including those known to be associated with MLA such as an elevated ESR and positive ACL and antinuclear antibodies, as well as those that have yet to be reported including anti-U1 ribonucleotide protein, anti-RNA polymerase III, anti-smith, and anti-proteinase 3 antibodies. Our patient, however, fails to meet criteria for any specific rheumatologic disease. It had previously been shown that 17% of patients with primary systemic vasculitis had autoantibodies associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome on at least 1 occasion [2]. While it is theorized that these autoantibodies are produced following exposure to antigens found on injured endothelial cells from vascular destruction, this does not explain the association of MLA with rheumatoid factor, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, or lupus antibodies (anti-smith, anti-histone, and anti-dsDNA). No effective treatment has been identified thus far for MLA. Treatments that have been attempted include anti-inflammatory or immunomodulators such as oral and topical steroids, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, colchicine, dapsone, pentoxyifylline, and diclofenac, as well as anticoagulants including aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, and low molecular weight heparin. Other miscellaneous treatments included nifedipine, doxycycline, and compression stockings. The majority of patients are managed expectantly given the asymptomatic and indolent nature of the disease [4].

Conclusion

Since MLA was first reported over 15 years ago, there have been over 50 cases described in the literature [6]. However, common knowledge and familiarity with this entity are generally lacking in both the dermatology and pathology fields. The true incidence of this disorder is likely not known, as patients with darker skin tones presenting with hyperpigmentation may simply be dismissed as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Therefore, it is paramount to continue to define MLA/LTA, identify effective treatment options, and include this entity in continuing medical education and trainee didactics. There currently is no established recommended systemic workup or treatment. Given the indolent course, further laboratory testing is not necessary.

Statement of Ethics

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. Every precaution has been taken to protect the privacy of research subjects and confidentiality of their personal information. This publication complies with the guidelines for human studies and was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Author Contributions

Nicole R. Bender reviewed the histopathology of the patient and performed search and analysis of information, initial drafting of the manuscript, and final approval of the manuscript. Elizabeth Bisbee and Douglas Robins aided in the acquisition of medical data including clinical examination, critical revision of the manuscript, and final approval of the manuscript. Vladimir Vincek and Kiran Motaparthi reviewed the histopathology of the patient, confirmed the diagnosis, conceptualized the project, performed critical revision of the manuscript, and final revision/approval of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed in this case report are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
  13 in total

1.  Macular arteritis associated with concurrent HIV and hepatitis B infections: a case report and evidence for a disease spectrum association with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa.

Authors:  Athanassios Kolivras; Curtis Thompson; Tanguy Metz; Josette André
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  Unilateral Macular Lymphocytic Arteritis.

Authors:  Ana Arana-Guajardo; Cynthia Mendoza-Rodríguez; Ivette Miranda-Maldonado
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Lymphocytic thrombophilic arteritis complicated by systemic involvement.

Authors:  Edmund Wee; Mandana Nikpour; Showan Balta; Richard A Williams; Robert I Kelly
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.875

Review 4.  Cutaneous lymphocytic thrombophilic (macular) arteritis: a distinct entity or an indolent (reparative) stage of cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa? Report of 2 cases of cutaneous arteritis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ricardo S Macarenco; Anjela Galan; Pollyanna M Simoni; Alessandra C Macarenco; Suzanne J Tintle; Roberta Rose; Charles L Halasz; J Andrew Carlson
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Macular lymphocytic arteritis: first clinical presentation with ulcers.

Authors:  M Llamas-Velasco; P García-Martín; J Sánchez-Pérez; E Sotomayor; J Fraga; A García-Diez
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.587

6.  Cutaneous arteritis presenting with hyperpigmented macules: macular arteritis.

Authors:  Howard Fein; Anita P Sheth; Diya F Mutasim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Lymphocytic thrombophilic arteritis: a newly described medium-sized vessel arteritis of the skin.

Authors:  Joyce Siong-See Lee; Steven Kossard; Michael A McGrath
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2008-09

8.  Lymphocytic thrombophilic arteritis and cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: Clinicopathologic comparison with blinded histologic assessment.

Authors:  Robert I Kelly; Edmund Wee; Showan Balta; Richard A Williams
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 9.  Lymphocytic Thrombophilic Arteritis: A Review.

Authors:  Sharif Vakili; John G Zampella; Shawn G Kwatra; Jaime Blanck; Manisha Loss
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.517

10.  Is macular lymphocytic arteritis limited to the skin? Long-term follow-up of seven patients.

Authors:  Thâmara Cristiane Alves Batista Morita; Gabriela Franco Sturzeneker Trés; Paulo Ricardo Criado
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.