Literature DB >> 35221757

The Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Surgery Under Epidural or Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Yoshimi Inagaki1, Michiaki Yamakage2, Atsuhiro Sakamoto3, Akifumi Okayama4, Nobuyo Oya5, Takehiko Hiraoka5, Kiyoshi Morita6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have been reported on the use of dexmedetomidine for sedating surgical patients requiring epidural or spinal anesthesia. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study at 12 hospitals in Japan.
METHODS: Adult patients were randomly allocated to receive an intravenous administration of placebo or dexmedetomidine at 0.067, 0.25, 0.5 or 1.0 µg/kg over 10 min after epidural or spinal anesthesia. All dexmedetomidine groups received dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h to maintain an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) score of ≤ 4; however, propofol was administered to rescue patients who exceeded this score. Surgery was then started 15 min after study drug infusion in patients with OAA/S score of ≤ 4. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients not requiring rescue propofol to achieve and maintain an OAA/S score of ≤ 4.
RESULTS: Of the 120 enrolled and randomized patients, 119 were treated the study: 22 received placebo and 97 received dexmedetomidine (23-25 patients per dose). Significantly more patients did not require propofol in the dexmedetomidine 0.5 and 1.0 µg/kg groups (68.0% and 80.0%, respectively) compared to the placebo group (22.7%) (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Common adverse events (AEs) were protocol-defined respiratory depression, bradycardia and hypotension. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the dexmedetomidine and the placebo groups.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that loading doses of 0.5 and 1.0 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, followed by an infusion at a rate of 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h, provide effective and well-tolerated sedation for surgical patients during epidural or spinal anesthesia. Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT01438957. ©2022 Tottori University Medical Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anesthesia; dexmedetomidine; epidural; propofol; spinal

Year:  2022        PMID: 35221757      PMCID: PMC8857668          DOI: 10.33160/yam.2022.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  23 in total

1.  Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions.

Authors:  J E Hall; T D Uhrich; J A Barney; S R Arain; T J Ebert
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Epidural ropivacaine anesthesia decreases the bispectral index during the awake phase and sevoflurane general anesthesia.

Authors:  Tadahiko Ishiyama; Satoshi Kashimoto; Takeshi Oguchi; Toshiaki Yamaguchi; Katsumi Okuyama; Teruo Kumazawa
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yavuz Demiraran; Esin Korkut; Ali Tamer; Ilknur Yorulmaz; Buket Kocaman; Gulbin Sezen; Yusuf Akcan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam.

Authors:  D A Chernik; D Gillings; H Laine; J Hendler; J M Silver; A B Davidson; E M Schwam; J L Siegel
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 5.  The facilitatory effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on the duration of spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Faraj W Abdallah; Amir Abrishami; Richard Brull
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited.

Authors:  J A Aldrete
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Improved sedation with dexmedetomidine-remifentanil compared with midazolam-remifentanil during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jin Sun Cho; Jae-Kwang Shim; Sungwon Na; Inhye Park; Young Lan Kwak
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.

Authors:  T J Ebert; J E Hall; J A Barney; T D Uhrich; M D Colinco
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  BIS guided sedation with propofol during spinal anaesthesia: influence of anaesthetic level on sedation requirement.

Authors:  T Ozkan-Seyhan; M Orhan Sungur; E Senturk; M Karadeniz; A Basel; M Senturk; K Akpir
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Propofol depresses the hypoxic ventilatory response during conscious sedation and isohypercapnia.

Authors:  R T Blouin; H A Seifert; H D Babenco; P F Conard; J B Gross
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.