Literature DB >> 35221362

Telemedicine in COVID-19 pandemic: Anaesthetic assessment of elective surgical patients through mobile application-based questionnaire.

Yek J L Jacklyn1, Yeo Ry Joanne1, S H Neo1, K K Chan1, Avinash Gobindram1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35221362      PMCID: PMC8820339          DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_733_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Anaesth        ISSN: 0019-5049


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

The pre-anaesthetic assessment aims to assess and optimise patients to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. It also improves patient satisfaction by allaying anxiety; minimises operative cancellations by facilitating a tailored anaesthetic plan; and reduces postoperative complications.[1] In our institution, all patients are assessed by the Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic (PAAC) anaesthetist or nurse prior to surgery. Infectious disease pandemics have spearheaded advancements in telemedicine to minimise nosocomial spread of infectious diseases. Leveraging on technological advances, we implemented an electronic Pre-anaesthetic questionnaire (ePAQ) to allow selected patients to be reviewed remotely. An ePAQ would ideally reduce contact time patients have in hospital, improve convenience as it can be done at out of business hours unlike a telephone consultation and minimise the possible risk of miscommunication or connectivity issues over the phone. The primary aim of our study was to determine the reliability of ePAQ in identifying American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I patients presenting for elective surgery as compared to face-to-face. Our hypothesis was that ePAQ is as effective as face-to-face assessment in identifying ASA I patients. The secondary aim was to assess patient satisfaction after use of ePAQ by administering a Patient experience questionnaire (PEQ), and if it could similarly allay patients’ fears like a face-to-face consult.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, observational retrospective audit conducted between October 2019 and October 2020 at Changi General Hospital, a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Ethics approval and waiver of consent was obtained (CIRB 2020/3111). Inclusion criteria were patients 18-44 years old, undergoing elective non-major surgery in orthopaedic surgery, ear, nose, throat surgery, general surgery, ophthalmology, urology or plastic surgery operation theatres; and were able to read and understand English. The ePAQ was developed by the PAAC team from validated electronic pre-anaesthetic assessments[23] and comprised 35 questions [Appendix 1]. Patients answered the ePAQ using an unmanned touch-screen computer terminal known as the Self-Empowering and Enabling Kiosk (SEEK) at the PAAC. Patients were advised to use the alcohol dispenser before and after the SEEK. The SEEK was then wiped down with chemical disinfectant after every use. Thereafter, patients underwent a standard face-to-face pre-anaesthetic evaluation where they saw either the PAAC anaesthetist or nurse, who was blinded to the ePAQ evaluation. An ASA score was assigned to the patient (PAAC-ASA). An anaesthetist in the study team, blinded to the PAAC-ASA, then reviewed the ePAQ and assigned an ASA score to the patient (ePAQ-ASA). Then, a PEQ survey [Appendix 2], adapted from a validated questionnaire[4] to measure patients’ experience of interaction, was administered to specifically evaluate patients’ experience of the face-to-face consultation.
Appendix 2

Patient experience questionnaire (PEQ) for patients aged 18 – 44 years

In order to provide a better service, we ask for your experience in this visit and what it felt like
1) Do you know what to expect regarding your anaesthetic experience on the day of your operation?
Much moreSome moreA bit moreNot much moreNo more
2) I had a good talk with the anaesthetic doctor/nurse
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
3) I felt reassured
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
4) The doctor/nurse understood what was on my mind
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
5) I felt I was taken care of
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
6) It was a bit difficult to connect with the doctor/nurse
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
7) Too much time was spent on small talk
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
8) It was a bit difficult to ask questions
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
9) Important decisions were made over my head
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
10) I sensed that other patients could listen in when I was talking to the staff
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
11) I felt like one of the crowd and not important
Agree completelyAgreeSo-soDisagreeDisagree completely
12) Emotions immediately after speaking to the doctor/nurse for my anaesthetic assessment

After this visit I felt (please circle one number for each line)

Relieved7654321Worried
Sad7654321Cheerful
Strengthened7654321Worn out
Relaxed7654321Tense
Patient experience questionnaire (PEQ) for patients aged 18 – 44 years Upon validation of the ePAQ, it was then launched on the Singhealth Health Buddy mobile application [Figure 1]. 201 patients listed for non-major surgery would have their height, weight, blood pressure and heart rate measured during the surgical consult. Patient information leaflets regarding the fasting instructions and the mode of anaesthesia was also provided. After filling in ePAQ remotely, it was reviewed by the PAAC anaesthetist or nurse who would then conduct a telephone consultation with the patient to verify the information collected. If the patient was deemed an ASA I patient, no face-to-face PAAC consultation would be required. Conversely, if the patient presented with medical comorbidities (ASA II and above), a face-to-face PAAC consultation was arranged.
Figure 1

Study methodology. ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; ePAQ: electronic pre-anaesthetic questionnaire; PEQ: Patient experience questionnaire

Study methodology. ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; ePAQ: electronic pre-anaesthetic questionnaire; PEQ: Patient experience questionnaire On the day of surgery, a study team member administered a PEQ to assess the patient’s satisfaction with ePAQ. Other outcomes collected included on-the-day cancellation. The sample size was calculated using a formula used for estimating inter-class correlation between two scales.[5] k = 2 was used as there were 2 raters – the ePAQ versus face-to-face anaesthetic consult. The intra-class correlation P/plan and width of confidence interval were assumed to be 0.7 and 0.2, respectively. Hence, for a two-sided test size with an alpha-error of 0.05 and power of 80%, a minimum sample of 101 patients was required. Taking into account a 20% dropout rate resulted in a sample size of 126. To assess the reliability and internal consistency of ePAQ, Cronbach’s alpha[6] was used to compare ASA scoring obtained from ePAQ and the standard face-to-face anaesthetic consult in PAAC. Cronbach’s alpha is a measure of internal consistency and provides an overall reliability coefficient in comparing the ASA scores obtained from the ePAQ to a consultation visit. Internal consistency describes the extent to which all the items in a test, the ePAQ in this instance, measures the same concept (ASA score) and hence the inter-relatedness of the items within the test. The interpretation of reliability is the correlation of the test to itself.[5] Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare patient satisfaction between those reviewed in PAAC against those who used the ePAQ. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics version 26 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were recruited for ePAQ validation with a mean age of 20.6 years (Median of 27.5 years with interquartile range of 12). 50 patients were recruited for assessment of patient satisfaction with ePAQ. The ASA score obtained from the ePAQ and face-to-face consultation was compared for internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha[6] [Table 1]. Reliability of ePAQ with PAAC-ASA using Cronbach’s alpha[6] was 0.849, which suggests that it has good reliability when assessed for internal consistency [Table 1].
Table 1

Reliability of PAAC-ASA versus ePAQ-ASA

ePAQ-ASATotal

IIIIII
ASA score (PAAC-ASA)ICount4712059
% within PAAC-ASA79.720.30.0100.0
% within ePAQ-ASA81.021.40.047.2
IICount1142255
% within PAAC-ASA20.076.43.6100.0
% within ePAQ-ASA19.075.018.244.0
IIICount02911
% within PAAC-ASA0.018.281.8100.0
% within ePAQ-ASA0.03.681.88.8
TotalCount585611125
% within PAAC-ASA46.444.88.8100.0
% within ePAQ-ASA100.0100.0100.0100.0

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; ePAQ: electronic pre-anaesthetic questionnaire

Reliability of PAAC-ASA versus ePAQ-ASA ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; ePAQ: electronic pre-anaesthetic questionnaire A comparison of responses between PAAC and ePAQ Application cohort [Table 2] and summary of responses [Table 3] was tabulated.
Table 2

Comparison of PEQ results between patients reviewed in PAAC

QuestionPAAC mean (Range)Mean rankePAQ mean (Range)Mean RankMann Whitney U P
Do you know what to expect regarding your anaesthetic experience on the day of your operation?0.8116.01.2142.537500.01*
I had a good talk with the anaesthetic doctor/nurse0.51170.7140.939290.02*
I felt reassured0.6120.40.6123.446560.76
The doctor/nurse understood what was on my mind0.6118.90.7136.541480.07
I felt I was taken care of0.5121.30.6124.846860.72
It was a bit difficult to connect with the doctor/nurse3.2125.03.1112.843670.23
Too much time was spent on small talk3.2124.53.2114.844660.34
It was a bit difficult to ask questions3.3125.73.2110.042260.12
Important decisions were made over my head3.2126.03.1108.841650.09
I sensed that other patients could listen in when I was talking to the staff3.2125.13.1109.942190.14
I felt like one of the crowd and not important3.2122.23.3121.447930.94
Emotions immediately after speaking to the doctor/nurse for my anaesthetic assessment
 (1) Worried → Relieved (7)5.8 (1-7)118.56.1 (4-7)133.142180.17
 (1) Cheerful → Sad (7)2.6 (1-7)122.92.4 (1-5)116.045260.52
 (1) Worn out → Strengthened (7)5.3 (1-7)119.05.5 (2-7)128.743890.36
 (1) Tense → Relaxed (7)5.6 (2-7)120.65.8 (2-7)130.144710.38

PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; PEQ: Patient experience questionnaire

Table 3

Summary of PEQ results

PEQ: Patient experience questionnaire; PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; ePAQ: electronic pre-anaesthetic questionnnaire

Comparison of PEQ results between patients reviewed in PAAC PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; PEQ: Patient experience questionnaire Summary of PEQ results PEQ: Patient experience questionnaire; PAAC: Pre-admission anaesthetic clinic; ePAQ: electronic pre-anaesthetic questionnnaire Patient satisfaction was similar between both groups of patients in the PAAC and ePAQ Application cohort. For the following questions, “Do you know what to expect regarding your anaesthetic experience on the day of your operation” and “I had a good talk with the anaesthetic doctor/nurse”, the PAAC group of patients scored better compared to the ePAQ group [Table 1]. When questioned about emotions, both the PAAC and ePAQ Application cohort felt relieved (as opposed to worried), cheerful (as opposed to sad), strengthened (as opposed to worn out) and relaxed (as opposed to tense). Both the PAAC and ePAQ Application patient cohort felt reassured and well taken care of. Neither group felt that there was difficulty asking questions. There were no on-the-day cancellations in both patient cohorts.

DISCUSSION

Our findings demonstrate that the ePAQ Application is as reliable as a face-to-face assessment and has brought about convenience and accessibility without compromising patient care, while allowing healthcare providers to focus resources on the patients in greatest need.[2] In fact, studies have demonstrated efficacy and patient safety of telemedicine[7] as patients may be more willing to interact with a computer than to reveal personal facts to a clinician.[27] Patient satisfaction on ePAQ was similar to being seen face-to-face. In both groups, emotions after the anaesthetic assessment were similar, with no statistical significance. In addition, both patient groups felt ‘taken care of’ and ‘reassured’. Potential barriers to telemedicine include hesitance to trust a clinician whom they have never encountered in person before,[78] which was not apparent in our findings. On the other hand, patients assessed face-to-face scored better in terms of being able to anticipate their anaesthetic experience on the day of surgery (‘knowledge acquisition’) as compared to those who used the ePAQ Application. The preoperative assessment should educate and facilitate informed decisions[9] suggesting room for improvement with the ePAQ. Strengths of this audit include the provision of longitudinal outcome measurements such as on-the-day cancellations. In addition, these are novel findings as efficacy and safety of telemedicine has yet to be tested in the preoperative assessment of surgical patients[8]; nevertheless, telemedicine has redesigned health care services in coronavirus disease-19 times and its implementation is attributed to modern computer technology[1011] Limitations include generalisability of results and selection bias. In this study, only patients proficient with mobile applications and the English language were eligible. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate clinical efficacy and economic equity.[12] For the ePAQ to be effective, it requires good patient collaboration which may include remote patient-directed assessment of temperature, blood pressure and pulse rate.[8] Issues may arise from the inability to conduct physical examination, particularly airway and cardiopulmonary assessment.[1] Despite the inability to assess the airway prior to surgery with the ePAQ application, there were no on-the-day cancellations in relation to unanticipated difficult airway. Possible reasons for this include a formal anaesthetic assessment prior to surgery allowing tailoring of the anaesthetic technique as well as a well-equipped institution with appropriate airway devices such as video-laryngoscopes that are readily available.

CONCLUSION

ePAQ provides a reliable assessment without compromising on medical care. Future studies evaluating the ePAQ with a more diverse group of patients can test its robustness.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Q1) General Health Questions

Apart from the current problem that you are awaiting surgery for, do you have any of the following symptoms or health problems?YESNO
a) High blood pressure (hypertension)?
b) Chest pain that comes on at rest or when you exercise?
c) Any heart disease (e.g. implantable pacemaker, previous heart attack, irregular heartbeat, heart valve problems or murmurs)?
d) Any kidney disorder?
e) Any thyroid disorder?
f) Any liver disorder?
g) Any blood disorder or low levels or blood (anaemia)?
h) History of strokes or a bleed in the brain, either minor or major?
i) Epilepsy (fits)?
j) Diabetes (sugar intolerance)?
k) Excessive bleeding/bruising?
l) History of a blood clot in your lungs or blood vessels in your leg?
m) Heart burn or acid reflux (Gastroesophageal reflux disease)?
n) Any neck problem or joint/muscular disorder?
o) Any psychological disorder e.g., depression?
p) Currently suffer from asthma or had asthma when you were younger?
If ‘YES’ proceed to (i), If NO, proceed to q.
(i)
In the past 4 weeks, how much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?SCORE
All of the time [1]Most of the time [2]Some of the time [3]A little of the time [4]None of the time [5].............
2. During the past 4 weeks, how often have you had shortness of breath?
More than Once a day [1]Once a day [2]3 to 6 times a week [3]Once or twice a week [4]Not at all [5].............
3.During the past 4 weeks, how often did your asthma symptoms (wheezing, coughing, shortness of breath, chest tightness or pain) wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?
4 or more nights a week [1]2 to 3 nights a week [2] Once a week [3]Once or twice [4]Not at all [5].............
4.During the past 4 weeks, how often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)?
3 or more times per day [1]1 to 2 times per day [2]2 or 3 times per week [3]Once a week or less [4]Not at all [5].............
5.How would you rate your asthma control during the past 4 weeks?
Not Controlled at All [1]Poorly Controlled [2]Somewhat Controlled [3]Well Controlled [4]Completely Controlled [5].............
q) Any other breathing problems, apart from asthma e.g., bronchitis, emphysema?
r) Any breathing problems while you sleep e.g., Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)?If YES, proceed to (i), if NO proceed to s)
 (i) Do you use a CPAP machine while you sleep
s) Any severe skin disorder (e.g. psoriasis, acne, eczema) for which you are on medication?
t) Any other condition that is not mentioned above? Please give details below.

Q2) Medications

YESNO
a) Are you on medication for any of the medical conditions listed above?
b) Are you on any other medication/Traditional Medicine/Vitamins?
If YES, to Q2b, proceed to (i) and (ii) , if NO - proceed to Q3
 (i) Is it Traditional medicine?
 (ii) Is it nutrients/vitamins/health supplements?

Q3) Smoking

YESNO
Do you smoke, or had stopped smoking only in the last 8 weeks?
If ‘YES’, proceed to (i), if NO , proceed to Q4
 (i) No. of cigarette sticks/day: _____ for _____ of years (duration).

Q4) Previous Anaesthetics

YESNO
Have you had previous operations that required anaesthesia in which you were either awake or asleep (regional/general)?
If ‘YES’, proceed to (i)&(ii); if ‘NO’, proceed to Q5.
(i) Were you told of any problems or complication with the anaesthesia? (e.g. problems putting the tube into your lungs, reaction with the anaesthesia medicine, anaesthesia did not work)
(ii) After the anaesthesia, did you have severe nausea and vomiting that lasted more than 12 hours?

Q5) Functional Capacity

YESNO
Do you normally have difficulty climbing up 1 floor or walking from one bus stop to the next one?
If ‘YES’, proceed to (i); if ‘NO’, proceed to Q6.
(i) This difficulty is due to [please tick the appropriate box (es)]:
Chest pain Shortness of Breath Arthritis (joint pain)
◻ ◻ ◻

Q6) Only For Female Patients

YESNO
Are you pregnant?
Are you on the Oral Contraceptive Pill?

Q7) Drug Allergy History

YESNO
Are you allergic or sensitive to certain medications?

Q8) Drug history

Can you safely take Panadol/Paracetamol without any problems?
NO – I CANNOT take itYES – I CAN take itNOT SURE
Can you safely take either Aspirin, Voltaren or Ibuprofen without any problems?
NO – I CAN NOT take itYES – I CAN take itNOT SURE
Can you safely take Arcoxia or Celebrex (COX 2 inhibitor) without any problems?
NO – I CANNOT take itYES – I CAN take itNOT SURE

Q9) Dental Hygiene

YESNO
Do you have any loose or wiggle teeth?
  10 in total

1.  Preadmission anaesthesia consultation clinic.

Authors:  J B Conway; J Goldberg; F Chung
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients' experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome.

Authors:  S Steine; A Finset; E Laerum
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire PreOperative): Development and validation.

Authors:  Iain M Goodhart; John C Andrzejowski; Georgina L Jones; Mireille Berthoud; Andy Dennis; Gary H Mills; Stephen C Radley
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Setting up and functioning of a preanaesthetic clinic.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Nishkarsh Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-11

5.  Telemedicine and anaesthesia.

Authors:  Veena Chatrath; Joginder Pal Attri; Raman Chatrath
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-05

Review 6.  Telemedicine for preoperative assessment during a COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations for clinical care.

Authors:  Maks Mihalj; Thierry Carrel; Igor D Gregoric; Lukas Andereggen; Pascal O Zinn; Dietrich Doll; Frank Stueber; Rodney A Gabriel; Richard D Urman; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  PreAnaesThesia computerized health (PATCH) assessment: development and validation.

Authors:  Tarig Osman; Eileen Lew; Elaine Pooi-Ming Lum; Louise van Galen; Rajive Dabas; Ban Leong Sng; Josip Car
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Technology, engineering and innovations- Power buffers in the COVID driveline.....

Authors:  Lalit Mehdiratta; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 9.  Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Antoine Rachas; Andrew J Farmer; Marco Inzitari; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-07
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  One nation, one roof, one set of preoperative investigations……The guidelines overcoming a diverse demography!

Authors:  Rashmi Datta; Madhuri S Kurdi; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  In pursuit of excellence in anaesthesia education…. vision, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Lalit Mehdiratta; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Madhuri S Kurdi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.