Literature DB >> 35220723

Estimating the percentage of patients who might benefit from proton beam therapy instead of X-ray radiotherapy.

Neil G Burnet1, Thomas Mee2, Simona Gaito1,2, Norman F Kirkby2, Adam H Aitkenhead2,3, Carmel N Anandadas1, Marianne C Aznar1,2, Lisa H Barraclough1, Gerben Borst1,2, Frances C Charlwood3, Matthew Clarke3, Rovel J Colaco1,2, Adrian M Crellin4, Noemie N Defourney2, Christina J Hague1, Margaret Harris1, Nicholas T Henthorn2, Kirsten I Hopkins5, E Hwang1,6, Sam P Ingram2,3, Karen J Kirkby2, Lip W Lee1, David Lines3, Zoe Lingard2, Matthew Lowe2,3, Ranald I Mackay3, Catherine A McBain1, Michael J Merchant2, David J Noble7, Shermaine Pan2, James M Price1,2, Ganesh Radhakrishna1, David Reboredo-Gil3, Ahmed Salem1,2, Srijith Sashidharan1, Peter Sitch3, Ed Smith1,8, Edward Ak Smith2,3, Michael J Taylor2, David J Thomson1,2, Nicola J Thorp1, Tracy Sa Underwood2, John W Warmenhoven2, James P Wylie1, Gillian Whitfield1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: High-energy Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) commenced in England in 2018 and NHS England commissions PBT for 1.5% of patients receiving radical radiotherapy. We sought expert opinion on the level of provision.
METHODS: Invitations were sent to 41 colleagues working in PBT, most at one UK centre, to contribute by completing a spreadsheet. 39 responded: 23 (59%) completed the spreadsheet; 16 (41%) declined, arguing that clinical outcome data are lacking, but joined six additional site-specialist oncologists for two consensus meetings. The spreadsheet was pre-populated with incidence data from Cancer Research UK and radiotherapy use data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. 'Mechanisms of Benefit' of reduced growth impairment, reduced toxicity, dose escalation and reduced second cancer risk were examined.
RESULTS: The most reliable figure for percentage of radical radiotherapy patients likely to benefit from PBT was that agreed by 95% of the 23 respondents at 4.3%, slightly larger than current provision. The median was 15% (range 4-92%) and consensus median 13%. The biggest estimated potential benefit was from reducing toxicity, median benefit to 15% (range 4-92%), followed by dose escalation median 3% (range 0 to 47%); consensus values were 12 and 3%. Reduced growth impairment and reduced second cancer risk were calculated to benefit 0.5% and 0.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The most secure estimate of percentage benefit was 4.3% but insufficient clinical outcome data exist for confident estimates. The study supports the NHS approach of using the evidence base and developing it through randomised trials, non-randomised studies and outcomes tracking. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Less is known about the percentage of patients who may benefit from PBT than is generally acknowledged. Expert opinion varies widely. Insufficient clinical outcome data exist to provide robust estimates. Considerable further work is needed to address this, including international collaboration; much is already underway but will take time to provide mature data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35220723     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  1 in total

1.  A concise guide to transtemporal contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children.

Authors:  Misun Hwang; Luis Octavio Tierradentro-Garcia
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-05-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.