Literature DB >> 35218394

Utility of Screening Fetal Echocardiogram Following Normal Anatomy Ultrasound for In Vitro Fertilization Pregnancies.

Rebecca R Spurr1, Jeffrey A Conwell2, Luciana T Young2, Mark B Lewin2, Lindsay A Edwards2, Bhawna Arya2.   

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is associated with a higher incidence of congenital heart disease, resulting in universal screening fetal echocardiograms (F-echo) even when cardiac structures on obstetric scan (OB-scan) are normal. Recent studies suggest that when OB-scan is normal, F-echo may add little benefit and increases cost and anxiety. We aim to determine the utility of screening F-echo in IVF pregnancies with normal cardiac anatomy on prior OB-scan. We conducted a retrospective chart review of IVF pregnancies referred for F-echo at the Seattle Children's Hospital between 2014 and 2020. OB-scan results and subspecialty of interpreting physician (Obstetrics = OB; Maternal Fetal Medicine = MFM; Radiology = Rads), F-echoes, and postnatal outcomes were reviewed. Cardiac anatomy on OB-scans was classified as complete if 4-chamber and outflow-tract views were obtained. Supplemental views (three-vessel and sagittal aortic arch views) on OB-scan were also documented. Of 525 IVF referrals, OB-scan reports were available for review in 411. Normal anatomy was demonstrated in 304 (74%) interpreted by OB (128; 42%), MFM (80; 26%), and Rads (96; 32%). F-echo was normal in 278 (91%). Of the 26 abnormal F-echo, none required intervention (17 muscular and 5 perimembranous ventricular septal defects, and 4 minor valve abnormalities). There was no difference in OB-scan accuracy for identifying normal cardiac anatomy when comparing 4-chamber and outflow-tract views vs. addition of supplemental views (91% vs 92% normal F-echo; p > 0.1). Evaluation of OB-scan accuracy by interpreting physician subspecialty demonstrated normal F-echo in 95%, 85%, and 92% (p = 0.95) as read by OB, MFM, and Rads, respectively. A majority of IVF referrals with normal cardiac anatomy visualized on OB-scan using 4-chamber and outflow-tract views resulted in normal F-echo, regardless of interpreting physician subspecialty or addition of supplemental views. Of the minority with abnormal F-echo, none required intervention. Consideration should be given to the cost/benefit of screening F-echo for the indication of IVF if normal cardiac anatomy is demonstrated on OB-scan.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Fetal echocardiogram; Fetal screening; In vitro fertilization

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35218394     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-022-02857-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.838


  11 in total

1.  The utility of fetal echocardiography after an unremarkable anatomy scan.

Authors:  Alexander M Friedman; Colin K L Phoon; Shira Fishman; David E Seubert; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Nadav Schwartz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mary T Donofrio; Anita J Moon-Grady; Lisa K Hornberger; Joshua A Copel; Mark S Sklansky; Alfred Abuhamad; Bettina F Cuneo; James C Huhta; Richard A Jonas; Anita Krishnan; Stephanie Lacey; Wesley Lee; Erik C Michelfelder; Gwen R Rempel; Norman H Silverman; Thomas L Spray; Janette F Strasburger; Wayne Tworetzky; Jack Rychik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The added value of screening fetal echocardiography after normal cardiac views on a detailed ultrasound.

Authors:  Chase R Cawyer; Spencer G Kuper; Elizabeth Ausbeck; Rachel G Sinkey; John Owen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Ultrasound Examination of the Fetal Heart.

Authors:  Katherine C Bishop; Jeffrey A Kuller; Brita K Boyd; Eleanor H Rhee; Stephen Miller; Piers Barker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.347

5.  Utility of fetal echocardiogram in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Peter R Muller; Andra James; Kristin Feldman; J Rene Herlong
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  The Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Selective Fetal Echocardiography for the Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Patients with Pregestational Diabetes Stratified by Hemoglobin A1c.

Authors:  Matthew M Finneran; Courtney A Ware; Miranda K Kiefer; Elizabeth O Buschur; Pamela M Foy; Stephen F Thung; Mark B Landon; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Evaluating the Performance of Ultrasound Screening for Congenital Heart Disease: A Descriptive Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rosemary J Froehlich; Lindsay Maggio; Phinnara Has; Erika F Werner; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Congenital heart disease, prenatal diagnosis and management.

Authors:  César H Meller; Sofía Grinenco; Horacio Aiello; Antonela Córdoba; María M Sáenz-Tejeira; Pablo Marantz; Lucas Otaño
Journal:  Arch Argent Pediatr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Utility of routine screening fetal echocardiogram in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Kurt R Bjorkman; Sarah H Bjorkman; Dina J Ferdman; Anna K Sfakianaki; Joshua A Copel; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Severity of congenital heart defects associated with assisted reproductive technologies: Case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Avinash S Patil; Cynthia Nguyen; Katie Groff; Jonathan Wu; John Elliott; Ravindu P Gunatilake
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.