Literature DB >> 35218378

Is Real-Time Microscopy on the Horizon? A Brief Review of the Potential Future Directions in Clinical Breast Tumor Microscopy Implementation.

Dan R Lopez1, Dennis Sgroi2, Savitri Krishnamourthy3, Guillermo Tearney4,2,5.   

Abstract

We will briefly review the current paradigm and some recent developments in the area of clinical breast microscopy, highlighting several promising commercially available, and research-based platforms. Confocal microscopy (reflectance, fluorescence, and spectrally encoded), optical coherence tomography (wide field and full field), stereomicroscopy, open-top light sheet microscopy, microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation, nonlinear microscopy, Raman scattering microscopy, photoacoustic microscopy, and needle microendoscopy will be discussed. Non-microscopic methods for breast pathology assessment are beyond the scope of this review. These microscopic technologies have to varying degrees the potential for transforming breast cancer care, but in order for any of these to be integrated into clinical practice there are several hurdles to overcome. In our review we will focus on what needs to be done in order for the commercially available technologies to become more established, what the technologies in the research domain need to do in order to reach the commercial realm; and finally, what the field of breast pathology might look like if these technologies were to be widely adopted.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast pathology; Breast tumor; Confocal; Ex vivo microscopy; In vivo microscopy; Light sheet; MUSE; Microscopic breast imaging; Needle microendoscopy; Nonlinear; Optical coherence; PAM; Paradigm; Raman; Real-time microscopy; Review; Stereomicroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35218378     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03300-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of surgically excised breast tissue microstructure using wide-field optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hank Schmidt; Courtney Connolly; Shabnam Jaffer; Twisha Oza; Christina R Weltz; Elisa R Port; Adriana Corben
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Use of intraoperative stereomicroscopy for preventing loss of metastases during frozen sectioning of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Z Varga; C Rageth; E Saurenmann; C Honegger; S von Orelli; M Fehr; D Fink; B Seifert; H Moch; R Caduff
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Rapid pathology of lumpectomy margins with open-top light-sheet (OTLS) microscopy.

Authors:  Ye Chen; Weisi Xie; Adam K Glaser; Nicholas P Reder; Chenyi Mao; Suzanne M Dintzis; Joshua C Vaughan; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Direct comparison between confocal and multiphoton microscopy for rapid histopathological evaluation of unfixed human breast tissue.

Authors:  Tadayuki Yoshitake; Michael G Giacomelli; Lucas C Cahill; Daniel B Schmolze; Hilde Vardeh; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Beyond the Margins-Economic Costs and Complications Associated With Repeated Breast-Conserving Surgeries.

Authors:  Leanne N Metcalfe; Adam M Zysk; Kiran S Yemul; Lisa K Jacobs; Elif E Oker; Howard R Underwood; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases.

Authors:  Mary F Dillon; Arnold D K Hill; Cecily M Quinn; Ann O'Doherty; Enda W McDermott; Niall O'Higgins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Spectrally encoded confocal microscopy for diagnosing breast cancer in excision and margin specimens.

Authors:  Elena F Brachtel; Nicole B Johnson; Amelia E Huck; Travis L Rice-Stitt; Mark G Vangel; Barbara L Smith; Guillermo J Tearney; Dongkyun Kang
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.662

8.  LITE microscopy: Tilted light-sheet excitation of model organisms offers high resolution and low photobleaching.

Authors:  Tanner C Fadero; Therese M Gerbich; Kishan Rana; Aussie Suzuki; Matthew DiSalvo; Kristina N Schaefer; Jennifer K Heppert; Thomas C Boothby; Bob Goldstein; Mark Peifer; Nancy L Allbritton; Amy S Gladfelter; Amy S Maddox; Paul S Maddox
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Comparative analysis of confocal microscopy on fresh breast core needle biopsies and conventional histology.

Authors:  C Elfgen; B Papassotiropoulos; Z Varga; L Moskovszky; M Nap; U Güth; A Baege; E Amann; F Chiesa; C Tausch
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Light-sheet microscopy for slide-free non-destructive pathology of large clinical specimens.

Authors:  Adam K Glaser; Nicholas P Reder; Ye Chen; Erin F McCarty; Chengbo Yin; Linpeng Wei; Yu Wang; Lawrence D True; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 25.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.