Literature DB >> 35218200

Bacteriophage Sf6 host range mutant that infects Shigella flexneri serotype 2a2 strains.

Min Yan Teh1, Elizabeth Ngoc Hoa Tran1, Renato Morona1.   

Abstract

Shigella flexneri serotype 2a2 (II:9;10) is the most prevalent strain in causing bacillary dysentery in developing countries. Chemical modifications such as glucosylation, O-acetylation, and phosphoethanolamine modifications of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O antigen (Oag) contribute to the emergence of various serotypes. Sf6 is a Shigella-specific bacteriophage that infects only a limited range of S. flexneri serotypes [X, Y]. LPS Oag is the primary receptor for bacteriophage Sf6 where it uses its tailspike protein (TSP) in binding and hydrolysing LPS Oags. Sf6TSP has recently been shown to be capable of hydrolysing the LPS Oag of Type II strains, albeit modestly. Phage therapy has regained attention in recent years as an alternative therapeutic approach. Therefore, this study aimed to expand the host range of Sf6 to the prevalent S. flexneri serotype 2a2 strain. We discovered a new lytic Sf6 host range mutant that is capable of infecting S. flexneri serotype 2a2 and identified residues in Sf6TSP that may potentially be involved in binding and hydrolysing serotype 2a2 LPS Oag. This work increased the limited Shigella-specific bacteriophage collection and may be useful in the future for phage therapy and/or biocontrolling of S. flexneri in contaminated food and water.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Shigella flexnerizzm321990 ; Sf6; bacteriophage; host range mutant; serotype 2a; tailspike protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35218200      PMCID: PMC8973906          DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnac020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.820


Introduction

Shigella flexneri is one of the most dominant strains in causing shigellosis in developing countries (Livio et al. 2014). Serotype 2a (29%), 3a (14%), and 1a (9%) are the three most prevalent serotypes in Asian countries (von Seidlein et al. 2006, Ye et al. 2010). Shigellosis is a global burden that has an annual morbidity rate of ∼269 million cases and ∼210 000 of mortality cases (Khalil et al. 2018). World Health Organisation has listed Shigella as a priority organism as it possesses great threat to human health (Tacconelli et al. 2018). All S. flexneri serotypes except serotype 6 share the same O antigen (Oag) polysaccharide backbone that is composed of one N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residue and three L-rhamnose (RhaI-RhaII-RhaIII) residues (Kenne et al. 1977). This forms the Oag polysaccharide of serotype Y. Various chemical modifications such as glucosylation, O-acetylation and phosphoethanolamine modification on different sugars increase Oag diversity and serotypes. Shigella flexneri serotypes are defined by a series of type and group O-factors (Boyd 1938, Carlin et al. 1989). Type O-factors are defined by Roman numerals (I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII) while group O-factors are defined by Arabic numerals (3,4; 6; 7,8; 9, and 10). Type O-factors are found within one serotype (e.g. serotype 2a and 2b share the type O-factor II) while group O-factors are shared among different serotypes (e.g. group factor 7,8 is found in serotype 2b, 3a, 5b, and X) (Carlin et al. 1989). The group O-factor 3,4 is defined as a backbone epitope and is shared by serotype 2a, 3b, 4a, 5a, and Y (Carlin and Lindberg 1987, Perepelov et al. 2012). The serotype Y strain has the antigenic formula of (-:3,4) because it does not have type O-factor. S. flexneri 2457T (2a2) has two known Oag modifications, glucosylation on RhaI (confers type O-factor II), and O-acetylations on RhaIII at position 3 or 4 (confers group O-factor 9) and on GlcNAc at position 6 (confers group O-factor 10), which are mediated by the gtrIIBA operon, oacB, and oacD genes, respectively (Kubler-Kielb et al. 2007, Perepelov et al. 2009, Sun et al. 2014, Wang et al. 2014). Therefore, the antigenic formula of S. flexneri 2457T is designated as (II:9;10). Both gtrIIBA operon and oacD gene are carried by the serotype-converting bacteriophage SfII prophage and are inserted between proA and adrA (Knirel et al. 2015). The oacB gene is carried by a transposon-like mobile element which is flanked by integrase and insertion sequences and is located upstream of adrA (Wang et al. 2014). Gene deletion of oacD only, oacB only or both oacD oacB in S. flexneri 2457T (2a2) gave rise to serotype 2a3 (II:9), 2a1 (II:10), and 2a (II:3,4), respectively, where serotype 2a3 and 2a2 are resistant to bacteriophage Sf6 (Teh et al. 2020). Bacteriophage Sf6 is a short-tailed dsDNA virus that belongs to the family of Podoviridae. Sf6 is a temperate bacteriophage and is part of the subgroup ‘P22-like’ phages because the morphology of Sf6 is very similar to P22 (Casjens and Thuman-Commike 2011). Sf6 is known to infect serotype X and Y of S. flexneri strains, converting them into serotype 3a and 3b, respectively (Clark et al. 1991). Our recent study showed that Sf6 is also capable of infecting S. flexneri serotype 2a (II:3,4) and 2a1 (II:10) strains lacking the oacB gene, converting them into serotype 3b (III:6) and 3b1 (III:6;10), respectively (Teh et al. 2020). Sf6 recognises specific LPS Oag via its tailspike protein (Sf6TSP). Sf6TSP is an endorhamnosidase enzyme that binds reversibly to LPS Oag (primary receptor) (Kang et al. 2016) which facilitates the cleavage of Oag repeat units between the 1,3-α-linkage of two rhamnose residues, releasing an octasaccharide product (Lindberg et al. 1978, Chua et al. 1999). Hydrolysis of Oag repeat units brings Sf6 closer to the bacterial surface. Sf6 then binds irreversibly to OmpA or OmpC (secondary receptor) on the outer membrane (Parent et al. 2014). Sf6TSP exists as a trimer (Muller et al. 2008) and consists of two domains, the highly conserved N-terminal domain (114 residues) that forms the capsid binding domain and the variable C-terminal domain (509 residues) that is responsible in recognising and cleaving the receptor into fragments (Steinbacher et al. 1997, Chua et al. 1999, Casjens et al. 2004). The enzymatic active sites (residues E366 and D399) of Sf6TSP are located on two different subunits of a trimer (Muller et al. 2008). Hence, a trimeric Sf6TSP contains three independent elongated glycan binding sites for LPS Oag fragments (Kunstmann et al. 2020). Sf6TSP has been shown to interact with LPS Oag of serotype 2a weakly (Kunstmann et al. 2018) and we have recently shown that Sf6TSP is capable of modestly cleaving LPS Oag repeat units of serotype 2a1, 2a2, 2a3, and 2a strains (Teh et al. 2020). To date, there are no Shigella vaccines generally available, and the emergence of multi-antibiotics resistance strains have necessitated a need to seek alternative methods of treatment. Phage therapy has regained attention in recent years to treat diseases caused by multi-antibiotic resistance bacteria. This study aims to isolate a Sf6 host range mutant that is capable of infecting the most prevalent S. flexneri strain. A new Sf6 host range mutant that infects S. flexneri serotype 2a2 was isolated in this study. Amino acid residues that are potentially involved in binding and hydrolysing LPS Oag of serotype 2a strains were also identified in this study. Our study contributes to understanding of the interaction between bacteriophage Sf6 and S. flexneri serotype 2a.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and bacteriophage

The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Sf6c is a clear plaque derivative of Sf6 and was propagated on S. flexneri serotype Y PE577 (Morona et al. 1994).
Table 1.

Strain used in this study.

StrainRelevant characteristicsReference
2457TVirulence plasmid positive S. flexneri serotype 2a2Lab collection
PE577 S. flexneri serotype YLab collection
RMA2159Virulence plasmid-cured S. flexneri serotype 2a2Lab collection
RMA4266 S. flexneri serotype 5b (PE565)Lab collection
RMA4267 S. flexneri serotype 4a (PE566)Lab collection
RMA4269 S. flexneri serotype 3b (PE645)Lab collection
RMA4270 S. flexneri serotype 2b (PE824)Lab collection
RMA4271 S. flexneri serotype 3a (PE843)Lab collection
RMA4272 S. flexneri serotype 4b (PE572)Lab collection
RMA4274 S. flexneri serotype 1a (PE839)Lab collection
RMA4275 S. flexneri serotype 1b (PE840)Lab collection
RMA4278 S. flexneri serotype 5a (PE856)Lab collection
RMA4335 S. flexneri serotype X (PE576)Lab collection
MYRM1069 S. flexneri 2457T ΔoacB serotype 2a1Teh et al. 2020
MYRM1071 S. flexneri 2457T ΔoacD ΔgtrIIBA serotype Y1Teh et al. 2020
MYRM1091 S. flexneri 2457T ΔoacD serotype 2a3Teh et al. 2020
MYRM1124 S. flexneri 2457T ΔoacD ΔoacB serotype 2aTeh et al. 2020
MYRM1134 S. flexneri 2457T ΔgtrIIBA ΔoacB serotype Y3Teh et al. 2020
MYRM1136 S. flexneri 2457T ΔgtrIIBA serotype Y2Teh et al. 2020
MYRM1138 S. flexneri 2457T ΔAllΔDIIBA+B serotype YTeh et al. 2020
Strain used in this study.

Growth media and growth conditions

All strains used in this study were routinely grown in Lysogeny Broth (LB) medium. Bacterial cultures were cultured for 18 h, diluted 1:20 and grown for 4 h with aeration at 37°C.

Bacteriophage plaque assay and spot assay

The bacteriophage plaque assay was performed by mixing 100 µL of bacteriophage (10–8 of an approximately 1 × 1011 pfu mL–1 stock) with equal amount of bacterial culture and incubated for 4 min at RT followed by 1 min incubation at 45°C. Then, 3 mL of soft agar (0.75% [w/v] LB agar, prewarmed at 45°C) was added into the bacterial/phage mixture and immediately overlayed onto a 25 mL LB agar plate. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 18 h. For the bacteriophage spot assay, 15 µL of bacterial culture was mixed with 0.35 mL of soft agar (0.75% [w/v] LB agar, prewarmed at 45°C) and immediately overlayed onto a 3 mL LB agar in a 12-well tray. Once the soft agar overlay was dried, 5 µL of phage (undiluted phage stock) was spotted onto the overlay and let dry. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 18 h.

DNA manipulation

The gp14 gene (encodes TSP) of Sf6(2a)c was PCR amplified and subsequently sequenced with primers MY_228_Up_tsp_F (5′ cttcgcaaacaccaggaac 3′) and MY_229_Down_tsp_R (5′ gttaagtgccgtgactgtt 3′) that target upstream and downstream of gp14, respectively. DNA sequence was analysed by Australian Genome Research Facility (Adelaide, Australia).

Expansion of Sf6c host range mutant

To isolate a new host range mutant that form clear plaques on S. flexneri serotype 2a2, Sf6c was first propagated in co-culture of PE577 and S. flexneri serotype 2a2 RMA2159 (ratio 1:1) for multiple rounds. Briefly, 100 µl of Sf6c (7.8 × 1010 pfu mL–1) was added into 1:20 of co-culture and grown at 37°C for 24 h with aeration. The co-culture was then pelleted, supernatant that contained phage was transferred to a new glass bottle and treated with chloroform for 30 min at 37°C to remove any live bacteria. One hundred microliters of the supernatant was then mixed with co-culture and the propagation repeated. After 8 rounds of propagation, a plaque assay was performed with RMA2159. Phage from a single clear plaque that formed on RMA2159 was purified, and further propagated on RMA2159 as described above. The newly isolated Sf6c host range mutant was named Sf6(2a)c.

Preparation of LPS samples and LPS analysis

The equivalent of 1 × 109 bacteria were centrifuged (2200 × g, 1 min) and resuspended in 50 µL lysis buffer, heated at 100°C for 10 min, cooled and treated with 2.5 µg mL–1 Proteinase K (#AM2542, Thermo Fisher) at 56°C for at least 4 h. The LPS samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and silver staining (Teh et al. 2012).

Preparation of formalin-fixed bacteria

The equivalent of 1 × 109 bacteria were centrifuged (2200 × g, 1 min), washed once with PBS and fixed with 100 µL of 1% (v/v) formalin in PBS at RT for 45 min. The formalin-fixed bacteria were washed once with PBS and resuspended in 100 µL PBS.

LPS hydrolysis assay by bacteriophage

The formalin-fixed bacteria (1 × 109 bacteria mL–1) were centrifuged (2200 × g, 1 min), resuspended in 100 µL of bacteriophage (1 × 1011 pfu mL–1) and incubated at 37°C for 45 min. The treated bacteria were washed twice with Milli-Q water and prepared LPS samples as described above.

Result and discussion

Sf6 expanded its host range to serotype 2a2 and 2a3

Sf6c is a derivative of Sf6 that forms clear plaques (lytic) on S. flexneri serotype Y (Morona et al. 1994). We and others have recently shown that Sf6TSP has some weak interaction with LPS Oag of serotype 2a strains (Kunstmann et al. 2018) and Sf6TSP is capable of hydrolysing LPS Oag of all serotype 2a strains (Teh et al. 2020). Therefore, we hypothesised that propagation of Sf6c in a S. flexneri co-culture that contained PE577 (serotype Y; susceptible to Sf6c) and RMA2159 (serotype 2a2; resistant to Sf6c) would allow Sf6c to evolve and improve its interaction with serotype 2a strains. RMA2159 was used as it is a virulence plasmid-cured S. flexneri 2457T strain and was safer to handle during phage propagation. The process of isolating Sf6c host range mutant was described in the Methods. Sf6c that couldn't plaque on RMA2159 (2a2) initially started forming opaque plaques after few rounds of propagation in co-cultures (data not shown) and eventually formed clear plaques on RMA2159 after eight rounds of propagation in co-cultures. We named the newly isolated host range mutant of Sf6c as ‘Sf6(2a)c’. Sf6(2a)c plaque assay results showed that Sf6(2a)c was capable of infecting PE577 (Y), RMA2159 (2a2), and all isogenic serotype variant strains of 2457T, such as ΔAllΔDIIBA+B (Y), ΔoacD ΔgtrIIBA (Y1), ΔgtrIIBA (Y2), ΔgtrIIBA ΔoacB (Y3), ΔoacB (2a1), ΔoacD ΔoacB (2a) and ΔoacD (2a3) strains (Fig. 1). Serotype 2a2 and 2a3 strains that had previously been shown to be resistant to Sf6c infection were now susceptible to Sf6(2a)c (Teh et al. 2020). This indicated that Sf6(2a)c had evolved and capable of infecting S. flexneri serotype 2a strains that were resistant to Sf6c.
Figure 1.

Sensitivity of serotype Y and 2a S. flexneri strains to the new host range mutant Sf6(2a)c. Bacteriophage Sf6(2a)c plaque assay. About 100 µL of overnight cultures of S. flexneri were incubated with 100 µL Sf6(2a)c (10–8) prior to mixed with 3 mL of soft LB agar and overlayed onto 25 mL LB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C, 18 h. Serotypes of each strain are indicated in parentheses. Scale bar indicates 10 mm.

Sensitivity of serotype Y and 2a S. flexneri strains to the new host range mutant Sf6(2a)c. Bacteriophage Sf6(2a)c plaque assay. About 100 µL of overnight cultures of S. flexneri were incubated with 100 µL Sf6(2a)c (10–8) prior to mixed with 3 mL of soft LB agar and overlayed onto 25 mL LB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C, 18 h. Serotypes of each strain are indicated in parentheses. Scale bar indicates 10 mm.

Sf6(2a)c retained its ability to infect serotype Y and X

We found that Sf6(2a)c was still capable of infecting serotype Y strains. We then investigated if Sf6(2a)c was still able to infect serotype X (like Sf6c) and/or had expanded its host range to other serotypes. A spot assay was performed on various serotypes strains (Y, X, 1a, 1b, 2a2, 2b, 3a, 3b, 5a, 5b, 4a, and 4b) (Fig. 2). Sf6(2a)c only formed clear spots on the serotype X strain, and hence Sf6(2a)c retained its ability to infect serotype X. Surprisingly, Sf6(2a)c formed an opaque spot on serotype 2b strain (RMA4270), indicating that the growth of serotype 2b strain was affected (Fig. 2). However, Sf6(2a)c could not form plaques on the serotype 2b strain (data not shown), suggesting that Sf6(2a)c has extremely weak interaction with serotype 2b strain and is only able to affect the growth of serotype 2b at high titre. The serotype 2b LPS Oag has glucosylation on both RhaI and RhaIII residues, while serotype 2a2 and 2a3 LPS Oags have both glucosylation and O-acetylation on RhaI and RhaIII, respectively (Teh et al. 2020). A recent study reported that O-acetylation or glucosylation on RhaIII had a similar effect on Oag helical conformation (Hlozek et al. 2020). Therefore, Sf6(2a)c which has the ability to infect 2a2 and 2a3 strains may then be able to interact with the LPS Oag of serotype 2b, albeit weakly.
Figure 2.

Sf6(2a)c spot assay on S. flexneri strains with different serotypes. Fifteen microliters of overnight cultures of S. flexneri were mixed with 350 µL of soft LB agar, overlayed onto 3 mL LB agar in a 12-well tray and let dry. About 5 µL of undiluted Sf6(2a)c phage stock was then spotted onto the soft agar. The tray was incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Serotypes of each strain are indicated in parentheses.

Sf6(2a)c spot assay on S. flexneri strains with different serotypes. Fifteen microliters of overnight cultures of S. flexneri were mixed with 350 µL of soft LB agar, overlayed onto 3 mL LB agar in a 12-well tray and let dry. About 5 µL of undiluted Sf6(2a)c phage stock was then spotted onto the soft agar. The tray was incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Serotypes of each strain are indicated in parentheses.

Sf6(2a)c tailspike protein has mutations that correlate to infection of serotype 2a2 and 2a3 strains

TSP (encoded by gp14) is the protein that mediates binding of Sf6 to LPS Oag of S. flexneri. Therefore, we hypothesised that Sf6(2a)c has mutated residues within the binding groove of TSP in order to increase its binding affinity to LPS Oag of serotype 2a2 and 2a3 strains. Sequencing of the Sf6(2a)c gp14 gene revealed three amino acids change: Q325L, A426G and N508T. Coincidentally, these amino acids mutations are in close proximity to the enzyme's active site residues (E366 D399), where both Q325 L and A426G are located within the glycan binding groove while N508T is located below the groove (Fig. 3). In a trimeric TSP, Q325 L is located on the same subunit as E366, while A426G and N508T are located on another subunit like D399 (Fig. 3). A recent MD simulations study reported that two Sf6TSP E366A D399A variants (V204C and S246C) that are in close proximity to the Oag binding site, had a slight increase in binding affinity to serotype Y LPS Oag (Kunstmann et al. 2020). This indicated that Sf6TSP can be engineered to increase its binding affinity to LPS Oag. In Sf6(2a)c, its TSP has mutated as a result of adaptation to improve its interaction with LPS Oag of serotype 2a2 and 2a3. The adaptive mutational alterations in the tsp gene arose spontaneously, and the sequences are not present in the genomes of the host strains.
Figure 3.

Location of mutated residues in Sf6(2a)cTSP. Three subunits of native TSP (PBD: 2VBK) are illustrated in light blue, green and grey cartoon. The catalytic residues, D399 and E366 are shown in black and orange spheres, respectively. The mutated residues identified in Sf6(2a)cTSP are depicted in blue (Q325L), pink (A426G), and yellow (N508T) spheres.

Location of mutated residues in Sf6(2a)cTSP. Three subunits of native TSP (PBD: 2VBK) are illustrated in light blue, green and grey cartoon. The catalytic residues, D399 and E366 are shown in black and orange spheres, respectively. The mutated residues identified in Sf6(2a)cTSP are depicted in blue (Q325L), pink (A426G), and yellow (N508T) spheres.

Sf6(2a)cTSP has improved serotype 2a LPS Oag hydrolysis

We have previously shown that while Sf6TSP can hydrolyse serotype 2a2 LPS Oag, it does so modestly, in a dose-dependent manner (Teh et al. 2020). We then investigated if the Sf6(2a)cTSP was able to hydrolyse serotype Y (PE577) and 2a2 (RMA2159) LPS Oags. We initially attempted to overexpress and purify Sf6(2a)cTSP for use in LPS hydrolysis assays but were unsuccessful due to low yield and stability. Therefore, LPS hydrolysis assays were performed on formalin-fixed bacteria using Sf6c and Sf6(2a)c phage. The results were analysed with SDS-PAGE and silver staining (Fig. 4). Oag repeat units 11–17 of the untreated and Sf6c- or Sf6(2a)c-treated LPS Oags of each strain were quantified by densitometry and the results were presented as a percentage of LPS Oag reduction or hydrolysis in Fig. 4.
Figure 4.

LPS hydrolysis assay mediated Sf6c or Sf6(2a)c bacteriophage on S. flexneri serotype Y (PE577) and 2a2 (RMA2159) strains. Overnight cultures of S. flexneri (1 × 109 bacteria mL–1) were formalin-fixed for 45 min at RT, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 100 µL of bacteriophage (1 × 1011 pfu mL–1). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 45 min, washed twice with Milli-Q water and resuspended in 50 µL lysis buffer. LPS samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and LPS silver staining as described in the Methods. The untreated and bacteriophage-treated LPS Oag repeat units 11–17 were measured by densitometry using ImageLab 6.1 and the results are presented as percentage of LPS hydrolysis/reduction.

LPS hydrolysis assay mediated Sf6c or Sf6(2a)c bacteriophage on S. flexneri serotype Y (PE577) and 2a2 (RMA2159) strains. Overnight cultures of S. flexneri (1 × 109 bacteria mL–1) were formalin-fixed for 45 min at RT, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 100 µL of bacteriophage (1 × 1011 pfu mL–1). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 45 min, washed twice with Milli-Q water and resuspended in 50 µL lysis buffer. LPS samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and LPS silver staining as described in the Methods. The untreated and bacteriophage-treated LPS Oag repeat units 11–17 were measured by densitometry using ImageLab 6.1 and the results are presented as percentage of LPS hydrolysis/reduction. As expected, Sf6c-mediated LPS hydrolysis of PE577 (Y) and RMA2159 (2a2) were > 98% and > 27%, respectively (Fig. 4, Lane 2 and 4, respectively). This is consistent with our previously reported data by using Sf6TSP protein (Teh et al. 2020). This is also similar for Sf6(2a)c-mediated LPS hydrolysis where serotype Y LPS Oag had > 92% hydrolysis (Fig. 4, Lane 6). Excitingly, there was a significant increase in Sf6(2a)c-mediated LPS hydrolysis of RMA2159 (> 68%), in comparison to Sf6c-mediated LPS hydrolysis (> 27%) of the same strain (Fig. 4, Lane 8 and 4, respectively). This data suggested that the amino acids mutations within the Sf6(2a)cTSP protein enhanced LPS hydrolysis of serotype 2a LPS Oags and subsequently allowing infection of 2a strains by Sf6(2a)c phage. Notably, Sf6(2a)c-mediated LPS hydrolysis on RMA2159 was incomplete and this is consistent with our previous finding that Sf6TSP was not able to achieve complete hydrolysis on LPS Oag of S. flexneri 2457T-derived strains (Teh et al. 2020). The data also suggested that partial hydrolysis of LPS Oags is sufficient for Sf6(2a)c to infect a serotype 2a strain.

Conclusion

A new host range mutant of Sf6c that infects the most prevalent S. flexneri serotype (2a2) was successfully isolated in this study. We showed that Sf6(2a)cTSP had improved LPS hydrolysis ability on serotype 2a2 strain and infection. The isolation of Sf6(2a)c contributes to our understanding of the interaction between Sf6TSP and its Oag receptor. Sf6(2a)c may be useful for phage therapy or biocontrolling of S. flexneri in contaminated food or water.
  30 in total

1.  Shigella flexneri O-antigens revisited: final elucidation of the O-acetylation profiles and a survey of the O-antigen structure diversity.

Authors:  Andrei V Perepelov; Maria E Shekht; Bin Liu; Sergei D Shevelev; Vladimir A Ledov; Sof'ya N Senchenkova; Vyacheslav L L'vov; Alexander S Shashkov; Lu Feng; Petr G Aparin; Lei Wang; Yuriy A Knirel
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-17

2.  OmpA and OmpC are critical host factors for bacteriophage Sf6 entry in Shigella.

Authors:  Kristin N Parent; Marcella L Erb; Giovanni Cardone; Katrina Nguyen; Eddie B Gilcrease; Natalia B Porcek; Joe Pogliano; Timothy S Baker; Sherwood R Casjens
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Absence of O antigen suppresses Shigella flexneri IcsA autochaperone region mutations.

Authors:  Min Yan Teh; Elizabeth Ngoc Hoa Tran; Renato Morona
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  Use of monoclonal antibodies to type Shigella flexneri in Bangladesh.

Authors:  N I Carlin; M Rahman; D A Sack; A Zaman; B Kay; A A Lindberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The chromosome of Shigella flexneri bacteriophage Sf6: complete nucleotide sequence, genetic mosaicism, and DNA packaging.

Authors:  Sherwood Casjens; Danella A Winn-Stapley; Eddie B Gilcrease; Renato Morona; Christiane Kühlewein; James E H Chua; Paul A Manning; William Inwood; Alvin J Clark
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Influence of Shigella flexneri 2a O Antigen Acetylation on Its Bacteriophage Sf6 Receptor Activity and Bacterial Interaction with Human Cells.

Authors:  Min Yan Teh; Axel Furevi; Göran Widmalm; Renato Morona
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Characterization of the rfc region of Shigella flexneri.

Authors:  R Morona; M Mavris; A Fallarino; P A Manning
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  O-antigen modifications providing antigenic diversity of Shigella flexneri and underlying genetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Y A Knirel; Qiangzheng Sun; S N Senchenkova; A V Perepelov; A S Shashkov; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.487

9.  Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis.

Authors:  Evelina Tacconelli; Elena Carrara; Alessia Savoldi; Stephan Harbarth; Marc Mendelson; Dominique L Monnet; Céline Pulcini; Gunnar Kahlmeter; Jan Kluytmans; Yehuda Carmeli; Marc Ouellette; Kevin Outterson; Jean Patel; Marco Cavaleri; Edward M Cox; Chris R Houchens; M Lindsay Grayson; Paul Hansen; Nalini Singh; Ursula Theuretzbacher; Nicola Magrini
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 71.421

10.  Increasing the Affinity of an O-Antigen Polysaccharide Binding Site in Shigella flexneri Bacteriophage Sf6 Tailspike Protein.

Authors:  Sonja Kunstmann; Olof Engström; Marko Wehle; Göran Widmalm; Mark Santer; Stefanie Barbirz
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.236

View more
  1 in total

1.  Host Range Expansion of Shigella Phage Sf6 Evolves through Point Mutations in the Tailspike.

Authors:  Sundharraman Subramanian; John A Dover; Kristin N Parent; Sarah M Doore
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.