Literature DB >> 35216901

The reckoning: The return of genomic results to 1444 participants across the eMERGE3 Network.

Kathleen A Leppig1, Alanna Kulchak Rahm2, Paul Appelbaum3, Sharon Aufox4, Sarah T Bland5, Adam Buchanan2, Kurt D Christensen6, Wendy K Chung3, Ellen Wright Clayton5, David Crosslin7, Josh Denny8, Shannon DeVange9, Adam Gordon4, Robert C Green5, Hakon Hakonarson10, Margaret H Harr10, Nora Henrikson11, Christin Hoell4, Ingrid A Holm12, Iftikhar J Kullo13, Gail P Jarvik7, Philip E Lammers14, Eric B Larson11, Noralane M Lindor13, Maddalena Marasa3, Melanie F Myers15, Emma Perez6, Josh F Peterson5, Siddharth Pratap16, Cynthia A Prows15, James D Ralston11, Hila Milo Rasouly3, Dan M Roden5, Richard R Sharp13, Rajbir Singh16, Gabriel Shaibi17, Maureen E Smith4, Amy Sturm2, Heidi A Thiese9, Sara L Van Driest4, Janet Williams2, Marc S Williams2, Julia Wynn3, Carrie L Blout Zawatsky6, Georgia L Wiesner5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III Network was to return actionable sequence variants to 25,084 consenting participants from 10 different health care institutions across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate system-based issues relating to the return of results (RoR) disclosure process for clinical grade research genomic tests to eMERGE3 participants.
METHODS: RoR processes were developed and approved by each eMERGE institution's internal review board. Investigators at each eMERGE3 site were surveyed for RoR processes related to the participant's disclosure of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and engagement with genetic counseling. Standard statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 25,084 eMERGE participants, 1444 had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified on the eMERGEseq panel of 67 genes and 14 single nucleotide variants. Of these, 1077 (74.6%) participants had results disclosed, with 562 (38.9%) participants provided with variant-specific genetic counseling. Site-specific processes that either offered or required genetic counseling in their RoR process had an effect on whether a participant ultimately engaged with genetic counseling (P = .0052).
CONCLUSION: The real-life experience of the multiarm eMERGE3 RoR study for returning actionable genomic results to consented research participants showed the impact of consent, method of disclosure, and genetic counseling on RoR.
Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consent; Genetic counseling; Genomic medicine; Return of results; eMERGE

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35216901     DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.864


  2 in total

1.  Returning individual genomic results to population-based cohort study participants with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Kinuko Ohneda; Yohei Hamanaka; Hiroshi Kawame; Nobuo Fuse; Fuji Nagami; Yoichi Suzuki; Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata; Muneaki Shimada; Atsushi Masamune; Yoko Aoki; Takanori Ishida; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  A RE-AIM Framework Analysis of DNA-Based Population Screening: Using Implementation Science to Translate Research Into Practice in a Healthcare System.

Authors:  Laney K Jones; Natasha T Strande; Evan M Calvo; Jingheng Chen; Gabriela Rodriguez; Cara Z McCormick; Miranda L G Hallquist; Juliann M Savatt; Heather Rocha; Marc S Williams; Amy C Sturm; Adam H Buchanan; Russell E Glasgow; Christa L Martin; Alanna Kulchak Rahm
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.772

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.