| Literature DB >> 35216363 |
Polina I Kuznetsova1, Anton A Raskurazhev1, Alla A Shabalina1, Anait L Melikhyan2, Irina N Subortseva2, Marine M Tanashyan1.
Abstract
Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) which is characterized by erythrocytosis and a high incidence of thrombotic complications, including stroke. The study aimed to evaluate red blood cell (RBC) morphodynamic properties in PV patients and their possible association with stroke. We enrolled 48 patients with PV in this cross-sectional study, 13 of which have a history of ischemic stroke. The control group consisted of 90 healthy subjects. RBC deformability and aggregation analysis were performed using a laser-assisted optical rotational red cell analyzer. The following parameters were calculated: aggregation amplitude (Amp), RBC rouleaux formation time constant (Tf), time of formation of three-dimensional aggregates (Ts), aggregation index (AI), rate of complete disaggregation (y-dis), and the maximal elongation of RBC (EImax). Statistical analysis was performed with the R programming language. There were significant differences in RBCs morphodynamics features between patients with PV and the control group. Lower EImax (0.47 (0.44; 0.51) vs. 0.51 (0.47; 0.54), p < 0.001) and γ-dis (100 (100; 140) vs. 140 (106; 188) s-1, p < 0.001) along with higher amplitude (10.1 (8.6; 12.2) vs. 7.7 (6.6; 9.2), p < 0.001) was seen in patients with PV compared with control. A statistically significant difference between PV patients with and without stroke in aggregation amplitude was found (p = 0.03). A logistic regression model for stroke was built based on RBC morphodynamics which performed reasonably well (p = 0.01). RBC alterations may be associated with overt cerebrovascular disease in PV, suggesting a possible link between erythrocyte morphodynamics and increased risk of stroke.Entities:
Keywords: LoRRca; Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms; brain infarcts; erythrocyte deformability; hematology; polycythemia vera
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35216363 PMCID: PMC8880197 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
RBC morphodynamics in PV patients and control.
| PV ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| EImax | 0.47 (0.44; 0.51) | 0.51 (0.47; 0.54) | 0.0003539 |
| Amp | 10.1 (8.6; 12.2) | 7.7 (6.6; 9.2) | 0.000006 |
| Tf, s | 2.7 (1.9; 4.9) | 3.5 (2.5; 5.4) | 0.1784 |
| Ts, s | 19.8 (15.5; 33.3) | 20.8 (16.2; 27.9) | 0.4032 |
| AI | 53.9 (39.7; 64.9) | 52.3 (43.2; 62.5) | 0.9693 |
| γ-dis, s−1 | 100 (100; 140) | 140 (106; 188) | 0.00009 |
Figure 1RBC morphodynamics in PV patients and control. RBCs—red blood cells. PV—polycythemia vera.
Figure 2A heatmap of the relative values of RBC morphodynamics parameters expressed as percentiles. The ‘Group’ column represents rows of observations, with darker colors indicating PV patients. The dendrograms represent the process of clustering with color defining major clusters.
Figure 3Correlation plot of RBC morphodynamic properties in PV patients and control. Numbers indicate the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, crossed-out are non-significant (at p < 0.05) correlations. Green (brown) color indicates positive (negative) correlations, color intensity represents their strength.
Main demographic and clinical characteristics in the study group.
| PV All ( | PV Stroke ( | PV No Stroke |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EImax | 0.47 (0.44; 0.51) | 0.46 (0.38; 0.52) | 0.47 (0.44; 0.51) | 0.7186 |
| Amp | 10.1 (8.6; 12.2) | 11.6 (10.0; 13.3) | 9.6 (7.8; 11.4) | 0.03573 |
| Tf, s | 2.7 (1.9; 4.9) | 2.4 (1.9; 4.5) | 2.7 (1.9; 5.0) | 0.9445 |
| Ts, s | 19.8 (15.5; 33.3) | 17.4 (15.6; 31.9) | 19.9 (15.8; 33.9) | 0.9076 |
| AI | 53.9 (39.7; 64.9) | 53.9 (39.7; 63.6) | 52.5 (39.7; 64.9) | 0.9416 |
| γ-dis, s−1 | 100 (100; 140) | 100 (100; 100) | 100 (100; 150) | 0.6081 |
| Age, years | 51.5 (42.8; 56) | 49 (45; 56) | 53.0 (41.5; 56.0) | 0.8891 |
| 23 (13.5; 40.0) | 15 (14;33) | 24 (13;45) | 0.4568 | |
| Ht, % | 45 (42; 49.5) | 43 (42; 46) | 46 (42; 50) | 0.5357 |
| Hb (g/L) | 157 (144;168) | 152 (144;166) | 158 (146; 169) | 0.8254 |
| RBC (×1012/L) | 5.6 (4.9; 6.5) | 4.8 (4.5; 5.7) | 6 (5.2; 6.7) | 0.02429 |
| PLT (×109/L) | 373 (259; 526) | 271 (228; 505) | 374 (296; 527) | 0.4864 |
| Hydrea | 34 (71%) | 10 (77%) | 24 (68.6%) | 0.8349 |
| ASA | 43 (90%) | 10 (77%) | 33 (94%) | 0.2231 |
| NCCN risk | ||||
| low | 17 (35.4%) | 0 (0) | 17 (48.6%) | 0.005 |
| moderate | 26 (54.2%) | 8 (61.5) | 18 (51.4%) | 0.7651 |
| high | 5 (10.4%) | 5 (38.4%) | 0 (0) | 0.0008 |
Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of RBC deformability parameters and their association with ischemic stroke in PV.
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariable Analysis | Model Summary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| ||
| EImax | 0.04 (0–93.1) | 0.41 | Not included in the model | χ²(5) = 14.22 | |
| Amp | 1.28 (1.0–1.64) | 0.05 | 1.40 (1.02–1.92) | 0.04 | |
| Tf | 1.03 (0.87–1.21) | 0.76 | 1.63 (1.06–2.52) | 0.03 | |
| AI | 1.0 (0.96–1.04) | 0.89 | 1.17 (1.01–1.36) | 0.04 | |
| Ts | 1.0 (0.96–1.04) | 0.99 | 1.04 (0.96–1.12) | 0.37 | |
| ydis | 1.0 (0.99–1.00) | 0.28 | 0.98 (0.96–1.00) | 0.07 | |
Figure 4Flowchart study design. * MRI—Magnetic resonance imaging.