| Literature DB >> 35216289 |
Naoki Motomura1, Yuto Yamazaki1, Daiki Koga1, Shogo Harashima1, Xin Gao1, Yuta Tezuka2,3, Kei Omata2,3, Yoshikiyo Ono2,3, Ryo Morimoto3, Fumitoshi Satoh2,3, Yasuhiro Nakamura4, Go Eun Kwon5, Man Ho Choi5, Akihiro Ito6, Hironobu Sasano1.
Abstract
Cortisol-producing adenoma (CPA) is composed of clear and compact cells. Clear cells are lipid abundant, and compact ones lipid poor but associated with higher production of steroid hormones. PRKACA mutation (PRKACA mt) in CPA patients was reported to be associated with more pronounced clinical manifestation of Cushing's syndrome. In this study, we examined the association of histological features and genotypes with cholesterol uptake receptors and synthetic enzymes in 40 CPA cases, and with the quantitative results obtained by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis in 33 cases to explore their biological and clinical significance. Both cholesterol uptake receptors and synthetic enzymes were more abundant in compact cells. GC-MS analysis demonstrated that the percentage of compact cells was inversely correlated with the concentrations of cholesterol and cholesterol esters, and positively with the activity of cholesterol biosynthesis from cholesterol esters. In addition, hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), which catalyzes cholesterol biosynthesis from cholesterol esters, tended to be more abundant in compact cells of PRKACA mt CPAs. These results demonstrated that both cholesterol uptake and biosynthesis were more pronounced in compact cells in CPA. In addition, more pronounced HSL expression in compact cells of PRKACA mt CPA could contribute to their more pronounced clinical manifestation.Entities:
Keywords: Cushing’s syndrome; HSL; PRKACA; cholesterol uptake; cortisol producing adenoma; de novo synthesis; immunohistochemistry; mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35216289 PMCID: PMC8875534 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Representative image of H&E staining and IHC. H&E staining and IHC of LDL-R, SR-B1, ACAT1, ACAT2, HSL and DHCR24.
Comparison of immunoreactivities of receptors and enzymes between clear cells and compact cells. Immunoreactivity of LDL-R, SR-B1, ACAT1, ACAT2, HSL and DHCR24 in both clear and compact tumor cells was semi-quantified and evaluated. Except for LDL-R, immunoreactivity of all the receptor and enzymes examined in this study were higher in compact than in clear tumor cells. The values of each factor were represented by the median [Range: 1st quartile, 3rd quartile].
| Cholesterol Uptake/Synthesis | Clear Cell | Compact Cell | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDL-R PIC-Score | 301.064 [171.6032–409.4358] | 358.1922 [208.0366–472.4762] | |
| SR-B1 PIC-Score | 8.0921 [0.0049–101.5824] | 80.7402 [2.1292–511.6923] | |
| ACAT1 H-Score | 14.1902 [2.0041–41.7950] | 66.8817 [15.3391–126.5957] | |
| ACAT2 H-Score | 68.7927 [23.7838–93.2270] | 196.1126 [151.3714–234.4872] | |
| HSL H-Score | 32.4039 [7.5268–71.3349] | 139.3665 [84.8874–194.0853] | |
| DHCR24 H-Score | 69.3694 [30.7692–95.6722] | 131.619 [99.8727–150.6372] |
Correlations between the percentage of compact cells and the cholesterol uptake/synthesis. The correlation between the percentage of compact cells and concentrations of individual cholesterol and its precursors, their metabolic ratios and immunoreactivity of receptors and enzymes were examined. Free cholesterol and cholesterol ester (Chol-L, Chol-M, Chol-P, Chol-A, Chol-Li, O, S) concentrations were significantly or tended to be inversely correlated with the percentage of the compact cells. The metabolic ratios corresponding to the activity of cholesterol ester metabolism (cholesterol/Chol-L, cholesterol/Chol-M, cholesterol/Chol-P, cholesterol/Chol-P, cholesterol/Chol-Li, O, S) were significantly or tended to be positively correlated with the percentage of compact cells, and cholesterol/7-DHC tended to be inversely correlated. ACAT1, ACAT2 and DHCR24 were positively correlated with the percentage of compact tumor cells, but SR-B1 tended to be inversely correlated.
| Steroids’ Concentration/ Metabolic Ratio | Compact Cell (%) |
|---|---|
| Cholesterol | ρ = −0.3783, |
| Chol-L | ρ = −0.3252, |
| Chol-M | ρ = −0.3289, |
| Chol-P | ρ = −0.3229, |
| Chol-Li, O, S | ρ = −0.3436, |
| Chol-A | ρ = −0.3977, |
| Des | ρ = −0.0267, |
| 7-DHC | ρ = 0.1541, |
| Latho | ρ = 0.1501, |
| Lano | ρ = 0.2136, |
| Cholesterol/Chol-L | ρ = 0.2978, |
| Cholesterol/Chol-M | ρ = 0.3282, |
| Cholesterol/Chol-P | ρ = 0.3145, |
| Cholesterol/Chol-Li, O, S | ρ = 0.3436, |
| Cholesterol/Chol-A | ρ = 0.4047, |
| Cholesterol/Des | ρ = −0.2025, |
| Cholesterol/7-DHC | ρ = −0.3275, |
| Cholesterol/Latho | ρ = −0.2340, |
| Cholesterol/Lano | ρ = −0.2774, |
| LDL-R PIC-Score | ρ = −0.1450, |
| SR-B1 PIC-Score | ρ = −0.2674, |
| ACAT1 H-Score | ρ = 0.5893, |
| ACAT2 H-Score | ρ = 0.3713, |
| HSL H-Score | ρ = 0.0181, |
| DHCR24 H-Score | ρ = 0.4045, |
Abbreviation; Chol-L (cholesterol laurate), Chol-M (cholesterol myristate), Chol-P, (cholesterol palmitate), Chol-Li, O, S, (cholesterol oleate, linoleate, stearate), Chol-A (cholesterol arachidonate), Des (desmosterol), 7-DHC (7-dehydrocholesterol), Latho (lathosterol), Lano (lanosterol).
Differences in cholesterol uptake/synthesis between PRKACA mt and non-PRKACA mt. HSL in compact cells tended to be higher in PRKACA mt cases but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The values of each factor were represented by the median [Range: 1st quartile, 3rd quartile].
| Steroids’ Concentration/ | Non- | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol | 5861.593 [5382.19–7136.4] | 5898.944 [4665.091–7147.887] | |
| Chol-L | 46.3632 [29.3517–147.358] | 64.4895 [9.1374–180.7776] | |
| Chol-M | 7589.288 [4313.768–20519.77] | 10,336.66 [463.5112–25,550.09] | |
| Chol-P | 12,178.57 [6960.808–33,207.79] | 14,221.98 [2074.188–28,670.039] | |
| Chol-Li, O, S | 52,515.09 [24,018.31–133,299.5] | 60,127.17 [6245.443–13,0951.9] | |
| Chol-A | 158,586.2 [67,639.35–479,610.3] | 169,709.2 [12,355.74–283,133.6] | |
| Des | 0.3454 [0.2962–0.3835] | 0.3152 [0.2789–0.4438] | |
| 7-DHC | 0.4979 [0.4369–0.5973] | 0.4975 [0.4432–0.6815] | |
| Latho | 2.2336 [1.4522–3.7237] | 3.0636 [1.0444–5.4423] | |
| Lano | 0.4145 [0.2240–1.2060] | 0.4596 [0.2714–1.2257] | |
| Cholesterol/Chol-L | 124.5981 [52.8000–187.3307] | 92.5434 [42.4202–409.0853] | |
| Cholesterol/Chol-M | 0.7128 [0.3678–1.2558] | 0.5590 [0.2862–9.5894] | |
| Cholesterol/Chol-P | 0.4522 [0.2144–0.7773] | 0.4714 [0.2330–2.1314] | |
| Cholesterol/Chol-Li, O, S | 0.1026 [0.0583–0.2294] | 0.1127 [0.0529–0.7270] | |
| Cholesterol/Chol-A | 0.0342 [0.0163–0.0802] | 0.0374 [0.0246–0.3992] | |
| Cholesterol/Des | 19,352.06 [13,583.11–21,680.68] | 17,301.79 [13,320.42–20,975.02] | |
| Cholesterol/7-DHC | 12,867.24 [8889.587–15,722.16] | 11,032.05 [7518.443–14,785.94] | |
| Cholesterol/Latho | 3216.884 [1521.676–4723.64] | 1764.608 [1048.45–6886.364] | |
| Cholesterol/Lano | 17,697.64 [4566.075–28014.47] | 14,490.77 [4024.852–24,823.25] | |
| LDL-R PIC-Score of whole tumor area | 255.5031 [204.7156–341.0808] | 212.0748 [135.9559–311.1807] | |
| SR-B1 PIC-Score of whole tumor area | 26.7668 [2.4042–131.9024] | 8.4648 [0.1653–54.8108] | |
| ACAT1 H-Score of whole tumor area | 35.5899 [6.2073–79.4407] | 50.0042 [12.6475–79.9881] | |
| ACAT2 H-Score of whole tumor area | 125.6836 [114.6927–143.0224] | 133.8384 [108.0684–145.4952] | |
| HSL H-Score of whole tumor area | 83.0157 [65.9521–109.9652] | 61.2836 [22.7286–93.5136] | |
| DHCR24 H-Score of whole tumor area | 118.1096 [109.633–127.5966] | 114.9842 [105.6652–124.4034] | |
| LDL-R PIC-Score of clear cells | 261.9615 [177.38–406.2435] | 374.8266 [55.4230–417.4899] | |
| SR-B1 PIC-Score of clear cells | 26.4515 [0.1785–68.7130] | 0.6045 [2.979 × 10-5–145.6982] | |
| ACAT1 H-Score of clear cells | 8.2791 [1.5629–36.5925] | 20.8763 [2.0101–54.7858] | |
| ACAT2 H-Score of clear cells | 68.4305 [27.0601–85.8050] | 72.2039 [18.6502–99.2369] | |
| HSL H-Score of clear cells | 37.2177 [9.7030–76.4627] | 15.2488 [2.2614–68.1975] | |
| DHCR24 H-Score of clear cells | 64.9594 [29.4409–96.4883] | 60.7895 [19.7590–95.6722] | |
| LDL-R PIC-Score of compact cells | 273.4003 [146.7106–432.0079] | 370.1031 [251.1391–552.4103] | |
| SR-B1 PIC-Score of compact cells | 144.6817 [4.0369–456.7502] | 15.6289 [0.3782–301.3014] | |
| ACAT1 H-Score of compact cells | 47.5116 [7.4780–118.3264] | 84.5003 [20.8420–140.7282] | |
| ACAT2 H-Score of compact cells | 198.1139 [168.0626–233.9138] | 194.5094 [138.6214–237.463] | |
| HSL H-Score of compact cells | 153.2234 [103.4131–199.9192] | 110.781 [66.3701–166.0313] | |
| DHCR24 H-Score of compact cells | 131.619 [98.1391–149.6554] | 125.5617 [99.8727–155.1823] |
Figure 2Difference in cholesterol uptake and synthesis depending on morphological features. Differences in cholesterol uptake and metabolism depending on the status of each cell in CPA are illustrated. (A): Cholesterol uptake and biosynthesis in relatively cholesterol enriched cells including clear tumor cells. Both cholesterol uptake and synthesis were low, and hormonal activity was also relatively low. (B): Cholesterol uptake and synthesis in cholesterol starved cells including compact tumor cells. Both cholesterol uptake and synthesis were increased, and hormonal activity was high. Increased cholesterol synthesis through the cholesterol ester metabolism could contribute to its characteristic shrinked morphology.