| Literature DB >> 35215651 |
Wenhao Zhang1, Jianchao Zhou1, Zhijin Cao1, Xinxing Wu1, Hui Wang1, Shuaibo Han1, Yan Zhang1, Fangli Sun1, Ting Zhang2.
Abstract
The extension of wood to a wider field has been restrained significantly due to its dimensional instability that arises from variation in moisture content, which in turn brings about the risk of cracking, warping or distortion. This work proposed a novel strategy to stabilize wood by means of the in situ construction of a thermotropic shape memory polymer (SMP) inside wood. The cross-linked copolymer network (PMP) with good shape memory behavior was first investigated based on the reaction of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) in a water/ethanol solution; then, the PMP was constructed inside wood via vacuum-pressure impregnation and in situ polymerization. The weight gain, volume increment and morphology observations clearly revealed that the PMP was mainly present in wood cell lumens, cell walls and pits. The presence of PMP significantly enhanced the dimensional stability of and reduced the cracks in wood. The desirable shape recovery abilities of PMP under heating-cooling cycles were considered to be the main reasons for wood dimensional stabilization, because it could counteract the internal stress or retard the shrinkage of cell walls once water was evaporated from the wood. This study provided a novel and reliable approach for wood modification.Entities:
Keywords: anti-cracking; dimension stability; in situ construction; shape memory polymer; wood
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215651 PMCID: PMC8876273 DOI: 10.3390/polym14040738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1The effect of monomer proportion (a) and crosslinker (b) on the average swelling rate of PMP. (c) Schematic presentation of the MMA/PEGDA cross-linked copolymer network.
Figure 2(a) FTIR spectra and (b) dissolution performance in different solvents for samples of PMMA, P(PEGDA) and PMP. The samples are indicated by red circles.
Figure 3(a) DSC thermograms of PMMA, P(PEGDA) and PMP. (b) SEM micrographs of the fracture surface of PMMA, P(PEGDA) and PMP at different magnifications. (c) Cyclic shape memory behavior of PMP at 60 °C.
Figure 4(a) Wood specimen before and after modification. (b) WPG and VPG of modified wood (MW). (c) SEM micrographs of untreated (W) and modified wood (MW).
Figure 5(a) The moisture absorption expansion rate and moisture absorption anti-swelling efficiency of the wood block, (b) the water absorption expansion rate and water absorption anti-swelling efficiency of wood block, and (c) the P and P of PMP during the three-cycle immersion test.
Volumetric change of wood samples under different moisture content.
| Samples | MC0 (%) | V0 (cm3) | MC1 (%) | V1 (cm3) | Volumetric Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 0.50 | 8.21 ± 0.26 | 28.63 | 9.35 ± 0.27 | 13.90 |
| MW | 0.61 | 8.45 ± 0.23 | 32.75 | 9.24 ± 0.24 | 9.37 |
Note: W and MW represent the untreated and modified wood, respectively; MC0 and MC1 represent the wood that was dried or conditioned to an absolutely dry state and the fiber saturation point, respectively; V0 and V1 correspond to the volume of the test block at the two states of moisture content. Volumetric change represents the rate of volume change from V0 to V1.
Figure 6Digital photos of W and MW after moistening-drying cycles (a) and after soaking-drying cycles (b); (c,d) show higher magnifications for the cracked samples. The cracks are indicated by red circles.
Figure 7(a) The change curve of wood moisture content with heating-cooling cycle. (b) The shrinkage of W and MW. (c) Schematic illustration of SMP in the wood cell wall.