| Literature DB >> 35215231 |
Alexey S Trenin1, Elena B Isakova1, Michael I Treshchalin1, Vasilisa A Polozkova1, Elena P Mirchink1, Alexey A Panov1, Alexander Y Simonov1, Olga P Bychkova1, Victor V Tatarskiy2,3, Sergey N Lavrenov1.
Abstract
The antimicrobial activity and toxicity of three novel synthetic antibacterial agents containing tris(1H-indol-3-yl)methylium fragment were studied in vitro and in vivo. All compounds in vitro revealed high activity (minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) 0.13-1.0 µg/mL) against bacteria that were either sensitive or resistant to antibiotics, including multidrug-resistant clinical isolates. The derivatives combining high antimicrobial activity with relatively low cytotoxicity against human donor fibroblasts HPF-hTERT were subjected to further testing on mice. In vivo they revealed fairly good tolerance and relatively low toxicity. Acute toxicity was evaluated, and the main indicators of toxicity, including LD50 and LD10, were determined. A study of compounds in vivo showed their efficiency in the model of staphylococcal sepsis in mice. The efficiency of compounds may be due to the ability of indolylmethylium salts to form pores in the cytoplasmic membrane of microbial cells and thereby facilitate the penetration of molecules into the pathogen.Entities:
Keywords: overcoming of drug resistance; staphylococcal sepsis; toxicity in vitro and in vivo; tris(1H-indol-3-yl)methylium; turbomycin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215231 PMCID: PMC8878324 DOI: 10.3390/ph15020118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–4.
Antimicrobial activity of compounds in vitro.
| Compounds | MIC, μg/mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Bacterial Strains | Gram-Positive Bacteria | ||||
| 0.25 (Lf) | 2 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.25 | |
| 32 (Lf) | 2 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | |
| 32 (Lf) | 2 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.5 | |
| 16 (Lf) | 2 | 0.5 | 0.13 | 0.25 | |
| 0.13 (Lf) | 1 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| 0.25 (Lf) | 4 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| 0.5 (Lf) | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.13 | |
| 0.5 (Lf) | 4 | 2 | >64 | 0.5 | |
| 1 (Lf) | 8 | 8 | >64 | 1 | |
| Bacterial Strains | Gram-Negative Bacteria | ||||
| 0.06 (Lf) | 8 | >64 | 16 | 32 | |
| 0.25 (Lf) | 2 | >64 | >64 | >64 | |
| 4 (Lf) | 64 | 16 | >64 | 1 | |
| 0.13 (Lf) | >64 | >64 | >64 | 32 | |
| 1 (Lf) | >64 | 32 | 16 | 64 | |
| Fungi Strains | Fungi | ||||
| 1 (Am B) | >64 | 12 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1 (Am B) | >64 | 8 | 2 | 2 | |
| Test Cells | Cytotoxic Activity IC50, μg/mL | ||||
| HPF-hTERT | >50 (Lf); | 13 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.07 |
Lf—levofloxacin; Am B—amphotericin B; IC50—concentration of compound inhibiting the growth of cells by 50%.
Doses that characterize the toxicity of various compounds based on indolylmethylium salts.
| Doses, mg/kg | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| LD50 | 26.2 (24.3 ÷ 28.1) | 41.8 (37.6 ÷ 45.9) | 24.2 (20.2 ÷ 28.2) |
| MTD (LD10) | 22.6 (21.0 ÷ 24.2) | 34.1 (31.0 ÷ 35.8) | 16.9 (15.4 ÷ 17.6) |
| LD16 | 23.4 | 35.8 | 18.5 |
| LD84 | 28.9 | 47.7 | 29.8 |
| LD100 | 30.2 | 50.7 | 32.6 |
Determination of the efficacy of compounds 1, 2 and 3 in comparison with levofloxacin in a model of staphylococcal sepsis in mice.
| Compound | Dose of the Drug, mg/kg | Death | Survival Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.0 | 87.5 | 12.5 |
| 5.0 | 75 | 25 | |
| 7.0 | 75 | 25 | |
| 9.0 | 62.5 | 37.5 | |
| 11.0 | 62.5 | 37.5 | |
| 13.0 | 75 | 25 | |
|
| 5.0 | 80 | 20 |
| 10.0 | 70 | 30 | |
| 15.0 | 60 | 40 | |
| 20.0 | 40 | 60 | |
| 25.0 | 40 | 60 | |
| 30.0 | 20 | 80 | |
| 35.0 | 30 | 70 | |
|
| 0.5 | 70 | 30 |
| 1.0 | 50 | 50 | |
| 1.5 | 40 | 60 | |
| 1.75 | 10 | 90 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 100 | |
| Levofloxacin | 1.0 | 90 | 10 |
| 2.0 | 60 | 40 | |
| 4.0 | 40 | 60 | |
| 6.0 | 30 | 70 | |
| Control (infected mice without treatment). | - | 100 | 0 |
| Intact Animals | - | 0 | 100 |
Determination of the effectiveness in the model of staphylococcal sepsis in mice after repeated administration of drug 1 at a dose of 3 mg/kg.
| Group Number | Regimen of Drug Administration | Days of Experiment | Death | Survival Rate (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 14 | ||||
| 1 | One-time | 0/8 | 1/7 | 2/6 | 4/4 | 5/3 | 5/3 | 6/2 | 7/1 | 7/1 | 7/1 | 87.5 | 12.5 |
| 2 | Double | 0/8 | 0/8 | 1/7 | 3/5 | 4/4 | 4/4 | 5/3 | 6/2 | 6/2 | 6/2 | 75 | 25 |
| 3 | Three-fold | 0/8 | 0/8 | 1/7 | 2/6 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/4 | 5/3 | 5/3 | 5/3 | 62.5 | 37.5 |
| 4 | Control | 0/8 | 2/6 | 3/5 | 5/3 | 6/2 | 7/1 | 8/0 | 8/0 | 8/0 | 8/0 | 100 | 0 |
Main indicators of the effectiveness of drugs evaluated in the model of staphylococcal sepsis in mice.
| Compound | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| ED50, mg/kg | 7.6 (4.85 ÷ 11/45) | 18.27 (11.9 ÷ 24.95) | 1.09 (0.77 ÷ 1.42) |
| LD50, mg/kg | 26,2 (24.3 ÷ 28.1) | 41.8 (37.6 ÷ 45.9) | 24.2 (20.2 ÷ 28.2) |
| TI | 3.45 | 2.3 | 22.2 |