| Literature DB >> 35215171 |
Clémence Nadal1,2, Maud Marsot1, Gaël Le Metayer3,4, Pascal Boireau5, Jacques Guillot3,6, Sarah I Bonnet2.
Abstract
Caused by two blood parasites, Babesia caballi and Theileria equi, equine piroplasmosis is a tick-borne disease that poses major health and economic issues for the equine industry. Our objective was to gain insight into the spatio-temporal variations of parasite circulation in France, where the disease is known to be enzootic, but has been the subject of few studies. Seroprevalence was assessed for each parasite thanks to 16,127 equine sera obtained between 1997 and 2003 from all over France and analysed through complement fixation tests. Results indicated that 13.2% (5-27% depending on the region) of horses were seropositive for T. equi and 9.5% (3-25%) for B. caballi. Regardless of the year, horses from the southern regions of France were the most affected by B. caballi or T. equi infection, while the proportion of horses having antibodies against T. equi increased over time. These results highlight the heterogeneity of the circulation of both piroplasms, which may be linked with ecological diversity and vector distribution. Our data provide baseline information regarding the sero-epidemiology of B. caballi and T. equi infection in horses in France, making it now possible to select regions for future studies on risk factors, and design and implement effective targeted measures against equine piroplasms.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia caballi; France; Theileria equi; equine piroplasmosis; seroprevalence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215171 PMCID: PMC8876836 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11020227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1(a) Seroprevalence of Theileria equi infection among a sample of horses tested from 1997 to 2003 in France according to region; (b) Seroprevalence of Babesia caballi infection among a sample of horses tested from 1997 to 2003 in France according to region; and (c) Names of French regions. Black circles indicate the number of horses tested in each region.
Figure 2Changes in equine piroplasmosis seroprevalence rates among horses from France between 1997 and 2003. (a) Proportion of horses seropositive for Theileria equi and Babesia caballi; (b) Number of sera analysed.
Figure 3Spatio-temporal variations between 1997 and 2003 in equine piroplasmosis seroprevalence among horses from different regions of France. (a) Seroprevalence of Babesia caballi; (b) Seroprevalence of Theileria equi. ARA = Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Occ. = Occitanie, BFC = Burgundy-Franche-Comté, N-A = New-Aquitaine, PACA = Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, PDL = Pays de la Loire, CVL = Centre-Val de Loire, IDF = Ile-de-France, G-E = Grand-Est, HDF = Hauts-de-France, Norm. = Normandy, and Britt. = Brittany.
Logistic regression for horse seropositivity for Babesia caballi, with year and region used as explanatory variables on the data collected in France between 1997 and 2003. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
| Variable | OR | CImin | CImax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGION | CVL | REF | ||
| ARA | 3.28 | 2.39 | 4.58 | |
| BFC | 3.00 | 2.09 | 4.36 | |
| Britt. | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.66 | |
| G-E | 0.69 | 0.43 | 1.09 | |
| HDF | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.56 | |
| IDF | 0.57 | 0.41 | 0.80 | |
| Norm. | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.52 | |
| N-A | 1.63 | 1.20 | 2.26 | |
| Occ. | 2.60 | 1.92 | 3.59 | |
| PDL | 1.05 | 0.76 | 1.48 | |
| PACA | 1.15 | 0.81 | 1.66 | |
| YEAR | 1997 | REF | ||
| 1998 | 0.97 | 0.80 | 1.17 | |
| 1999 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.12 | |
| 2000 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 1.13 | |
| 2001 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 1.04 | |
| 2002 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.94 | |
| 2003 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.81 |
Variables for which the OR is significantly >1 are shown in bold, the ones for which OR < 1 are shown in italics. CVL = Centre-Val de Loire, ARA = Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, BFC = Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Britt. = Brittany, G-E = Grand-Est, HDF = Hauts-de-France, IDF = Ile-de-France, Norm. = Normandy, N-A = New-Aquitaine, Occ. = Occitanie, PDL = Pays de la Loire, PACA = Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur.
Logistic regression for horses seropositivity for Theileria equi with year and region used as explanatory variables on the data collected in France between 1997 and 2003. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
| Variable | OR | CImin | CImax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGION | CVL | REF | ||
| ARA | 2.65 | 2.00 | 3.57 | |
| BFC | 2.33 | 1.66 | 3.28 | |
| Britt. | 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.66 | |
| G-E | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.98 | |
| HDF | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.57 | |
| IDF | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.08 | |
| Norm. | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.55 | |
| N-A | 1.82 | 1.39 | 2.41 | |
| Occ. | 2.41 | 1.84 | 3.19 | |
| PDL | 1.03 | 0.77 | 1.39 | |
| PACA | 1.75 | 1.30 | 2.38 | |
| YEAR | 1997 | REF | ||
| 1998 | 1.22 | 1.02 | 1.47 | |
| 1999 | 1.34 | 1.12 | 1.62 | |
| 2000 | 1.25 | 1.05 | 1.49 | |
| 2001 | 1.55 | 1.30 | 1.85 | |
| 2002 | 1.65 | 1.37 | 1.98 | |
| 2003 | 1.66 | 1.37 | 2.00 |
Variables for which the OR is significantly >1 are shown in bold, the ones for which OR < 1 are shown in italics. CVL = Centre-Val de Loire, ARA = Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, BFC = Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Britt. = Brittany, G-E = Grand-Est, HDF = Hauts-de-France, IDF = Ile-de-France, Norm. = Normandy, N-A = New-Aquitaine, Occ. = Occitanie, PDL = Pays de la Loire, PACA = Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur.